Vol 3, No 4 (2017)
Review paper
Published online: 2018-01-22

open access

Page views 9324
Article views/downloads 20489
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Endoprotezy stawów biodrowych wczoraj i dziś

Łukasz Sieczka1, Andrzej Bohatyrewicz1, Szymon Pituch1
Forum Reumatol 2017;3(4):216-221.

Abstract

Endoprotezoplastyka stawu biodrowego jest w XXI wieku złotym standardem leczenia zaawansowanych zmian destrukcyjnych stawów biodrowych w przebiegu wielu jednostek chorobowych. Co czwarta osoba w starszym wieku będzie miała objawy choroby zwyrodnieniowej stawu biodrowego w trakcie swojego życia, a co dziesiąta przejdzie operację całkowitej endoprotezoplastyki tego stawu. Początki leczenia za pomocą alloplastyki stawu biodrowego sięgają XIX wieku, lecz główny rozwój tego sposobu leczenia to poprzednie stulecie. Wielcy mistrzowie chirurgii jak sir John Charnley, Austin Moore czy Peter Ring inspirują kolejne pokolenia ortopedów do udoskonalania leczenia sposobem alloplastyki i pozwalają przywracać sprawność osobom, które w skutek procesu chorobowego zapomniały, jak można poruszać się swobodnie i bez dolegliwości bólowych. Forum Reumatol. 2017, tom 3, nr 4: 216–221  

Article available in PDF format

View PDF (Polish) Download PDF file

References

  1. Culliford DJ, Maskell J, Kiran A, et al. The lifetime risk of total hip and knee arthroplasty: results from the UK general practice research database. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012; 20(6): 519–524.
  2. Murphy LB, Helmick CG, Schwartz TA, et al. One in four people may develop symptomatic hip osteoarthritis in his or her lifetime. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010; 18(11): 1372–1379.
  3. Haraguchi A, Nakashima Y, Miyahara H, et al. Minimum 10-year results of cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2017; 27(4): 598–604.
  4. Gomez PF, Morcuende JA. Early attempts at hip arthroplasty--1700s to 1950s. Iowa Orthop J. 2005; 25: 25–29.
  5. Rhea Barton J. The classic. On the treatment of anchylosis, by the formation of artificial joints. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1827; 279(3): 400.
  6. Baer WS. Arthroplasty with the aid of animal membrane. Amer Jour Orth Surg. 1918; 16(1): 171.
  7. Chlumsky, V., Zentralblatt für or thopaedische Chirurgie. Continued Centralblatt für orthopaedische Chirurgie un mechanik from 1887-1890. 1886.
  8. Eynon-Lewis NJ, Ferry D, Pearse MF. Themistocles Gluck: an unrecognised genius. BMJ. 1992; 305(6868): 1534–1536.
  9. Jones R, Lovett R. Orthopaedic Surgery. W William, Baltimore 1929.
  10. Smith-Petersen MN. ARTHROPLASTY OF THE HIP: A New Method. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1939; 21(2): 269–288.
  11. Smith-Petersen MN. Evolution of mould arthroplasty of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1948; 30B(1): 59–75.
  12. Baker JF, Vioreanu MH, Khan HA. Smith-Petersen Vitallium mould arthroplasty: a 62-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93(9): 1285–1286.
  13. JUDET J, JUDET R. The use of an artificial femoral head for arthroplasty of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1950; 32-B(2): 166–173.
  14. Kovac S, Pisot V, Trebse R, et al. Fifty-one-year survival of a Judet polymethylmethacrylate hip prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(5): 664–667.
  15. Moore A, Bohlman H. Metal hip joint. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1943; 25: 688–692.
  16. Thompson FR. Two and a half years' experience with a vitallium intramedullary hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954; 36-A(3): 489–502.
  17. Hernigou P, Quiennec S, Guissou I. Hip hemiarthroplasty: from Venable and Bohlman to Moore and Thompson. Int Orthop. 2014; 38(3): 655–661.
  18. Wiles P. The surgery of the osteoarthritic hip. Br J Surg. 1958; 45(193): 488–497.
  19. McKee GK, Watson-Farrar J. Replacement of arthritic hips by the McKee-Farrar prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1966; 48(2): 245–259.
  20. Charnley J. Arthroplasty of the hip. A new operation. Lancet. 1961; 1(7187): 1129–1132.
  21. Charnley J. A biomechanical analysis of the use of cement to anchor the femoral head prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965; 47: 354–363.
  22. Chen Q, Thouas G. Metallic implant biomaterials. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports. 2015; 87: 1–57.
  23. Ring PA. Complete replacement arthroplasty of the hip by the ring prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1968; 50(4): 720–731.
  24. Ring PA. Replacement of the hip joint. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1971; 48(6): 344–355.
  25. Ring PA. Total replacement of the hip. Br Med J. 1972; 2(5809): 350.
  26. Jones LC, Hungerford D. Cement Disease. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1987; 225: 192–206.
  27. Harris WH. Osteolysis and particle disease in hip replacement. A review. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994; 65(1): 113–123.
  28. Gallo J, Goodman SB, Konttinen YT, et al. Particle disease: biologic mechanisms of periprosthetic osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. Innate Immun. 2013; 19(2): 213–224.
  29. Lin JCF, Liang WM. Outcomes after fixation for undisplaced femoral neck fracture compared to hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture among the elderly. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 16: 199.
  30. Bjørgul K, Reikerås O. Hemiarthroplasty in worst cases is better than internal fixation in best cases of displaced femoral neck fractures: a prospective study of 683 patients treated with hemiarthroplasty or internal fixation. Acta Orthop. 2006; 77(3): 368–374.