Vol 3, No 2 (2017)
Review paper
Published online: 2017-06-20

open access

Page views 1270
Article views/downloads 3694
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Diagnostyka olbrzymiokomórkowego zapalenia tętnic — technika wykonania biopsji tętnicy skroniowej powierzchownej

Marcin Milchert, Bernard Piotuch, Marek Brzosko
Forum Reumatol 2017;3(2):72-80.

Abstract

Do ustalenia rozpoznania olbrzymiokomórkowego zapalenia tętnic konieczne jest wykazanie obecności zmian zapalnych w ścianie tętnic, tak jak na analogicznej zasadzie dla rozpoznania reumatoidalnego zapalenia stawów konieczne jest stwierdzenie zmian zapalnych w stawach. Chociaż mocno rozwija się diagnostyka obrazowa tętnic, to za złoty standard diagnostyczny nadal uważana jest biopsja tętnicy skroniowej powierzchownej.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF (Polish) Download PDF file

References

  1. Jennette JC, Jennette JC, Falk RJ, et al. 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum. 2013; 65(1): 1–11.
  2. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010; 69(9): 1580–1588.
  3. Ezeonyeji AN, Borg FA, Dasgupta B, et al. BSR and BHPR Standards, Guidelines and Audit Working Group. BSR and BHPR guidelines for the management of giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010; 49(8): 1594–1597.
  4. Milchert M, Diamantopoulos A, Brzosko M. Atlas zastosowań ultrasonografii w układowych zapaleniach dużych naczyń: olbrzymiokomórkowe zapalenie tętnic i choroba Takayasu. Wydawnictwo Pomorskiej Akademii Medycznej, Szczecin 2016.
  5. Hunder GG, Arend WP, Bloch DA, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of vasculitis. Introduction. Arthritis Rheum. 1990; 33(8): 1065–1067.
  6. Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ. Giant-cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. giant cell arteritis. Ann Intern Med. . 2003; 139: 505–515.
  7. Gonzalez-Gay MA. The diagnosis and management of patients with giant cell arteritis. J Rheumatol. 2005; 32(9): 1186–1188.
  8. Gonzalez-Gay MA, Garcia-Porrua C, Llorca J, et al. Biopsy-negative giant cell arteritis: clinical spectrum and predictive factors for positive temporal artery biopsy. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2001; 30(4): 249–256.
  9. Chatelain D, Duhaut P, Schmidt J, et al. Groupe de Recherche sur l'Artérite à Cellules Géantes. Pathological features of temporal arteries in patients with giant cell arteritis presenting with permanent visual loss. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 68(1): 84–88.
  10. Luqmani R, Lee E, Singh S, et al. The Role of Ultrasound Compared to Biopsy of Temporal Arteries in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis (TABUL): a diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness study. Health Technol Assess. 2016; 20(90): 1–238.
  11. Mukhtyar C, Guillevin L, Cid MC, et al. European Vasculitis Study Group. EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 68(3): 318–323.
  12. Stacy RC, Rizzo JF, Cestari DM. Subtleties in the histopathology of giant cell arteritis. Semin Ophthalmol. 2011; 26(4-5): 342–348.
  13. Yoon MK, Horton JC, McCulley TJ. Facial nerve injury: a complication of superficial temporal artery biopsy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011; 152(2): 251–255.e1.
  14. Serafim AS, Sign S, Piper J. Early halo sign features on ultrasound examination of treated patients with giant cell arteritis. Kongres ACR/ARHP . 2014, Abstract 796.
  15. Singh S, Hutchings A, Forrester-Barker W, et al. Preliminary Analysis of Histological Findings in Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis Biopsy Positive Patients. Kongres ACR/ARHP. 2015, Abstract 793.
  16. Reicher M, Łasiński W. Układ naczyń tętniczych. In: Reicher M, Łasiński W. ed. Anatomia człowieka tom III Układ naczyniowy. Bochenek A, Wydawnictwo PZWL, Warszawa 1993.
  17. Geibprasert S, Pongpech S, Armstrong D, et al. Dangerous extracranial-intracranial anastomoses and supply to the cranial nerves: vessels the neurointerventionalist needs to know. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 30(8): 1459–1468.
  18. Pipinos II, Hopp R, Edwards WD, et al. Giant-cell temporal arteritis in a 17-year-old male. J Vasc Surg. 2006; 43(5): 1053–1055.
  19. Currey J. Scalp necrosis in giant cell arteritis and review of the literature. Br J Rheumatol. 1997; 36(7): 814–816.
  20. Agarwal CA, Mendenhall SD, Foreman KBo, et al. The course of the frontal branch of the facial nerve in relation to fascial planes: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125(2): 532–537.
  21. Babakurban ST, Cakmak O, Kendir S, et al. Temporal branch of the facial nerve and its relationship to fascial layers. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2010; 12(1): 16–23.
  22. Zani R, Fadul R, Da Rocha MA, et al. Facial nerve in rhytidoplasty: anatomic study of its trajectory in the overlying skin and the most common sites of injury. Ann Plast Surg. 2003; 51(3): 236–242.
  23. Gosain AK, Sewall SR, Yousif NJ. The temporal branch of the facial nerve: how reliably can we predict its path? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 99(5): 1224–33; discussion 1234.
  24. Moubayed SP, Barker DA, Rawnsley J, et al. Recognizing an abnormal course of the temporal division of the facial nerve. Eplasty. 2014; 14: ic21.
  25. Miloro M, Redlinger S, Pennington DM, et al. In situ location of the temporal branch of the facial nerve. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65(12): 2466–2469.
  26. Davies JC, Fattah A, Ravichandiran M, et al. Clinically relevant landmarks of the frontotemporal branch of the facial nerve: a three-dimensional study. Clin Anat. 2012; 25(7): 858–865.
  27. Diamantopoulos AP, Haugeberg G, Hetland H, et al. Diagnostic value of color Doppler ultrasonography of temporal arteries and large vessels in giant cell arteritis: a consecutive case series. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014; 66(1): 113–119.
  28. Ball J, Malhotra R. Efficacy of unilateral versus bilateral temporal artery biopsies for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000; 129(4): 559–560.
  29. Grossman C, Ben-Zvi I, Barshack I, et al. Association between specimen length and diagnostic yield of temporal artery biopsy. Scand J Rheumatol. 2016; 20: 1–4.
  30. Au CP, Sharma NS, McCluskey P, et al. Increase in the length of superficial temporal artery biopsy over 14 years. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016; 44(7): 550–554.
  31. Espígol-Frigolé G, Prieto-González S, Alba MA, et al. Advances in the diagnosis of large vessel vasculitis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2015; 41(1): 125–40, ix.
  32. Bettelli G. Preoperative evaluation in geriatric surgery: comorbidity, functional status and pharmacological history. Minerva Anestesiol. 2011; 77(6): 637–646.
  33. Moldzio P, Peters J. [Perioperative patient management in orthogeriatrics]. Orthopade. 2017; 46(1): 54–62.