English Polski
Vol 14, No 2 (2017)
Research paper
Published online: 2017-06-30

open access

Page views 1799
Article views/downloads 12035
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Who and how conducts psychotherapy in Poland. Part II. Results from a nationwide survey

Hubert Suszek, Lidia Grzesiuk, Rafał Styła, Krzysztof Krawczyk
Psychiatria 2017;14(2):90-100.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The first part of the article presented an overview of research projects focused on psychotherapy in Poland. The second part demonstrates results of a study conducted amongst Polish psychotherapists in 2012.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 1196 persons conducting psychotherapy in Poland fully completed a nationwide online survey (or, alternatively, a paper and pencil enquiry) concerning their education, training, experience, and clinical work. The results are compared with findings of similar studies from other countries.

RESULTS: Among the primary findings were: (1) psychotherapy in Poland is conducted mostly by women (80%); (2) almost all therapists have an MA degree, including 75.2% having graduated in psychology; (3) the psychotherapists are well trained (mean number of training hours is above 942) and established (average experience is about 9.8 years); (4) more than half of the therapists have no type of certificate; (5) 54% of respondents identify with the integrative or eclectic orientation and, simultaneously, for 48.6% of the therapists the most important approach is either psychodynamic or psychoanalytic; (6) the most common form of therapy is individual psychotherapy in private practice; (7) the majority of the therapists treat adult patients with anxiety or personality disorders.

CONCLUSIONS: The results show that psychotherapeutic practice is well established in Poland and many indices are similar to those found in Western countries.

References

  1. Schofield M. Australian counsellors and psychotherapists: A profile of the profession. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 2008; 8(1): 4–11.
  2. Muller F. Psychotherapy in Argentina: Theoretical orientation and clinical practice. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration. 2008; 18(4): 410–420.
  3. Liu X, Cao Y, Shi Q, et al. National survey of therapeutic orientation and associated factors of counselors and psychotherapists in China. Exp Ther Med. 2013; 5(4): 1075–1082.
  4. Tantam D. Psychotherapy in the UK: Results of a survey of registrants of the United Kingdom Council for Psychotherapy. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling. 2006; 8(3): 321–342.
  5. Schröder T, Wiseman H, Orlinsky D. "You were always on my mind": therapists' intersession experiences in relation to their therapeutic practice, professional characteristics, and quality of life. Psychother Res. 2009; 19(1): 42–53.
  6. Bhola P, Kumaria S, Orlinsky D. Looking within: self-perceived professional strengths and limitations of psychotherapists in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy. 2012; 3(2): 161–174.
  7. Orlinsky DE, Rønnestad MH. How psychotherapists develop: A study of therapeutic work and professional growth. American Psychological Association, Washington 2005.
  8. Coscollá A, Caro I, Ávila A, et al. Theoretical orientations of spanish psychotherapists: Integration and eclecticism as modern and postmodern cultural trends. J Psychother Integr. 2006; 16(4): 398–416.
  9. Willutzki U, Botermans JF. Ausbildung in Psychotherapie in Deutschland und der Schweiz und ihre Bedeutung für die therapeutische Kompetenz. Psychotherapeut. 1997; 42(5): 282–289.
  10. Cook JM, Biyanova T, Elhai J, et al. What do psychotherapists really do in practice? An Internet study of over 2,000 practitioners. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2010; 47(2): 260–267.
  11. Cook JM, Schnurr PP, Biyanova T, et al. Apples don't fall far from the tree: influences on psychotherapists' adoption and sustained use of new therapies. Psychiatr Serv. 2009; 60(5): 671–676.
  12. Bae S, Joo E, Orlinsky D. Psychotherapists in South Korea: Professional and Practice Characteristics. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2003; 40(4): 302–316.
  13. Orlinsky DE, Schofield MJ, Schroder T, et al. Utilization of personal therapy by psychotherapists: a practice-friendly review and a new study. J Clin Psychol. 2011; 67(8): 828–842.
  14. Bike DH, Norcross JC, Schatz DM. Processes and outcomes of psychotherapists' personal therapy: Replication and extension 20 years later. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2009; 46(1): 19–31.
  15. Gelso CJ. Emerging and continuing trends in psychotherapy: views from an editor's eye. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2011; 48(2): 182–187.
  16. Aldridge S, Pollard J. Interim report to Department of Health on initial mapping project for psychotherapy and counselling [Internet]. 2016: www.bacp.co.uk/admin/structure/files/doc/651_DoH_interim-rep_jun05.doc.
  17. Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJJ, et al. The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses. Cognit Ther Res. 2012; 36(5): 427–440.
  18. Michalski D, Mulvey T, Kohout J. APA Survey of Psychology Health Service Providers [Internet]. Science Directorate, American Psychological Association. 2010: http://204.14.132.173/workforce/publications/08-hsp/report.pdf.
  19. Norcross J, Hedges M, Castle P. Psychologists conducting psychotherapy in 2001: A study of the Division 29 membership. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 2002; 39(1): 97–102.
  20. Styła R, Grzesiuk L, Suszek H, et al. Characteristics of therapists working with people experiencing psychosis: A nation-wide survey in Poland. Psychosis. 2014; 7(3): 265–268.
  21. Czabała JC, Brykczyńska C. Psychoterapeuci w Polsce na tle innych krajów europejskich - badania w wybranych ośrodkach psychoterapeutycznych. Psychoterapia. 2000; 4(115): 5–12.
  22. Czabała JC, Brykczyńska CA. comparison of psychotherapists in Poland to other European countries: A survey of selected psychotherapeutic centres. Arch Psychiatry Psychother. 2001; 3(4): 71–78.