Vol 82, No 3 (2024)
Clinical vignette
Published online: 2024-02-09

open access

Page views 428
Article views/downloads 328
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Left-sided congenital absence of pericardium confirmed by decubitus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Shu Yoshihara1, Taku Yaegashi2, Masaki Matsunaga3, Masaaki Naito1
Pubmed: 38348619
Pol Heart J 2024;82(3):351-352.

Abstract

Not available

CLINICAL VIGNETTE

Left-sided congenital absence of pericardium confirmed by decubitus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Shu Yoshihara1Taku Yaegashi2Masaki Matsunaga3Masaaki Naito1
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Iwata City Hospital, Iwata, Japan
2Department of Radiological Technology, Iwata City Hospital, Iwata, Japan
3Department of Cardiology, Iwata City Hospital, Iwata, Japan

Correspondence to:

Shu Yoshihara, MD, PhD,

Department of Diagnostic Radiology,

Iwata City Hospital, 512-3 Ookubo,

Iwata, 438–8550, Japan,

phone: +81 538 38 5000,

fax: +81 538 38 5052,

e-mail: shuy@hospital.iwata.shizuoka.jp

Copyright by the Author(s), 2024

DOI: 10.33963/v.phj.99270

Received: December 18, 2023

Accepted: February 4, 2024

Early publication date: February 9, 2024

A 52-year-old man presented with chest discomfort. Physical examination and cardiac serum markers were unremarkable. A 12-lead electrocardiogram showed right axis deviation and an incomplete right bundle branch block (Supplementary material, Figure S1). Chest radiography showed a leftward shift of the cardiac silhouette (Figure 1A).

Figure 1. A. Chest radiography posteroanterior view showing a leftward shift of cardiac silhouette. B. Three-dimensional volume-rendered reconstruction of cardiac computed tomography (CCT) showing significant stenosis in the proximal segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD, white arrow). C. Axial supine CCT image showing leftward, posterior positioning of the heart in the thoracic cavity. D. Multiplanar reconstruction short-axis CCT image showing the absence of the upper half of the surrounding pericoronary adipose tissue in the mid to distal segment of the LAD (middle: yellow arrow; right: blue arrow), unlike the proximal segment of the LAD, which was completely surrounded by the pericoronary adipose tissue (left: white arrow). Arrow positions correspond to panel B. E. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) steady-state free-precession sequence, coronal view in the left lateral decubitus position, showing the heart location adjacent to the left thoracic wall. F. Cardiac MRI steady-state free-precession sequence, coronal view in the right lateral decubitus position, showing the heart position recovered to the midline in the thoracic cavity, resulting in interposition of left lung tissue between the heart and left thoracic wall (arrowheads)

Transthoracic echocardiography in the parasternal long-axis view showed that the left ventricular (LV) apex was posteriorly directed (Video S1). Electrocardiography-gated cardiac computed tomography (CCT) showed significant stenosis in the proximal segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD; Figure 1B: white arrow). Notably, CCT showed leftward, posterior positioning of the heart in the thoracic cavity (Figure 1C). CCT did not show lung interposition between the pulmonary trunk and the aortic arch or between the left hemidiaphragm and the base of the heart. CCT multiplanar reconstruction images showed the absence of the upper half of the surrounding pericoronary adipose tissue in the mid to distal segment of the LAD (Figure 1D middle: yellow arrow; right: blue arrow), unlike the proximal segment of the LAD, which was completely surrounded by the pericoronary adipose tissue (Figure 1D left: white arrow). We suspected congenital absence of the pericardium (CAP) and performed cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the left lateral decubitus position, cardiac MRI showed the heart adjacent to the left thoracic wall (Figure 1E; Video S2S4). Conversely, in the right lateral decubitus position, cardiac MRI showed the heart position recovered to the midline in the thoracic cavity, resulting in interposition of the left lung tissue between the heart and left thoracic wall (Figure 1F, arrowheads; Video S5S7). Based on this dynamic alteration in cardiac position depending on posture, a definitive diagnosis of complete left CAP was made. Subsequently, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed for a 90% stenotic lesion in the proximal site of the LAD. His chest discomfort completely disappeared after PCI.

CAP can be subdivided into complete and partial types based on defect size and site [1]. Complete CAP could be biventricular, left-sided, or right-sided only. Complete CAP is mostly silent and found incidentally, while partial CAP can present with positional chest pain and has a higher risk of serious complications such as herniation of cardiac structure and coronary circulation compression [2]. Complete left CAPs are most common, with a reported prevalence of 70% [1]. A diagnosis of CAP can be made by combining several non-invasive imaging findings. A leftward shift and levorotation of the heart is an imaging finding that can be a diagnostic clue pointing to CAP. Direct visualization of the pericardium is sometimes difficult in the LV lateral and posterior walls even in normal cases, because epicardial and pericardial fat is often negligible or absent in this region [3]. Therefore, lack of visibility of the pericardium on cardiac MRI or CCT does not prove the absence of the pericardium. Positional change is a simple and reliable intervention for echocardiographic diagnosis of CAP [4]. Although the diagnostic usefulness of decubitus imaging in CAP with CCT has been reported, it requires a double radiation dose [5]. In our case, decubitus cardiac MRI demonstrated dynamic alteration in cardiac position that led to a definitive diagnosis of complete left CAP. Decubitus cardiac MRI can provide convincing objective information about CAP without radiation exposure.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at https://journals.viamedica.pl/polish_heart_journal.

Article information

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Funding: None.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, which allows downloading and sharing articles with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at polishheartjournal@ptkardio.pl

REFERENCES

  1. Shah AB, Kronzon I. Congenital defects of the pericardium: a review. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 16(8): 821827, doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev119, indexed in Pubmed: 26003149.
  2. Santos RB, Sá I, Kiesewetter C, et al. Complete absence of the peri­cardium in a competitive athlete. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(12): 1744, doi: 10.5603/KP.2018.0237, indexed in Pubmed: 30566221.
  3. Lopez D, Asher CR. Congenital Absence of the Pericardium. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017; 59(4): 398406, doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2016.12.002, indexed in Pubmed: 27956198.
  4. Sun BJ, Park JH, Kim J, et al. Echocardiographic diagnosis of total or left congenital pericardial absence with positional change. Heart. 2017; 103(15): 12031209, doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310870, indexed in Pubmed: 28280147.
  5. Hoey ETD, Yap KiS, Darby MJ, et al. Complete left pericardial defect: evaluation with supine and decubitus dual source CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009; 3(6): 417419, doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2009.07.002, indexed in Pubmed: 19733526.