Vol 82, No 2 (2024)
Clinical vignette
Published online: 2023-10-19

open access

Page views 397
Article views/downloads 342
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

An unusual long-term follow-up of a patient with a left ventricular pseudoaneurysm after myocardial infarction

Jowita Zachwyc1, Małgorzata Kobusiak-Prokopowicz1, Maciej Guziński2, Wiktor Kuliczkowski1
Pubmed: 37997830
Pol Heart J 2024;82(2):239-240.

Abstract

Not available

CLINICAL VIGNETTE

An unusual long-term follow-up of a patient with a left ventricular pseudoaneurysm after myocardial infarction

Jowita Zachwyc*1Małgorzata Kobusiak-Prokopowicz*1Maciej Guziński2Wiktor Kuliczkowski1
1Department of Cardiology, Institute of Heart Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
2Department of Radiology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
*Both authors equally contributed to the study.

Correspondence to:

Jowita Zachwyc, MD,

Department of Cardiology,

Institute of Heart Diseases,

Wroclaw Medical University,

Borowska 213, 50–556 Wrocław, Poland,

phone: +48 603 306 582,

e-mail: zachwyc@gmail.com

Copyright by the Author(s), 2024

DOI: 10.33963/v.kp.97727

Received: July 10, 2023

Accepted: October 5, 2023

Early publication date: October 19, 2023

Left ventricular free wall rupture can be complicated by cardiac tamponade or pseudoaneurysm. The latter complication manifests clinically with heart failure and thromboembolic complications, but 10% to 48% of patients remain asymptomatic [1, 2].

A thin wall and reduced stress tolerance increase the risk of pseudoaneurysm rupture, which occurs in 30% to 45% of cases [3]. The gold standard treatment is cardiac surgery [1]. In rare cases, pseudoaneurysms are treated conservatively or with percutaneous repair [4].

A 75-year-old woman was admitted for inferolateral myocardial infarction. We performed ad hoc circumflex artery angioplasty that was complicated by coronary artery perforation. Surgical relief of cardiac tamponade was performed, and the perforation was successfully sealed using a TachoSil patch. The patient developed paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, which was treated with rivaroxaban.

At 8 weeks, the patient had a consultation with the Heart Team due to a pseudoaneurysm in the inferolateral left ventricular wall, as shown on computed tomography (CT) (Figure 1A).

Figure 1. A. Cardiac computed tomography left ventricular pseudoaneurysm. B. Cardiac computed tomography partial thrombosis of the pseudoaneurysm. C. Cardiac computed tomography recanalization of the pseudoaneurysm. D. Transesophageal echocardiography. The arrow indicates a thrombus adherent to the occluding device

She was considered ineligible either for surgical or percutaneous aneurysm closure. Discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment was recommended. Follow-up CT (Figure 1B) at 5 months showed significant thrombosis of the aneurysm. During the subsequent year, ambulatory treatment with rivaroxaban was introduced. Control CT (Figure 1C) revealed partial recanalization of the aneurysm. Following the previous percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage using the Watchman device, and 8 weeks after the procedure, anticoagulant treatment was discontinued. This led to the formation of a device-related thrombus, as shown on echocardiography (Figure 1D) at 12 weeks. Ten months after the initiation of rivaroxaban, the device-related thrombus resolved and partial recanalization of the pseudoaneurysm was achieved, as evidenced by magnetic resonance imaging. Anticoagulant treatment was again discontinued, but imaging studies 2 months later showed a free-floating thrombus originating from the aneurysm cavity as well as multiple occlusions in the arteries of the right lower limb. Unfractionated heparin was administered, followed by rivaroxaban, resulting in complete thrombus resolution after 7 days of treatment. CT at 3 months revealed the lack of an organized thrombus. The size of the pseudoaneurysm remained stable over the 3-year follow-up. The Heart Team decided on the continuation of rivaroxaban.

Despite cardiac surgery recommendation for our patient [5], we opted for a watchful waiting approach, mainly because of the high perioperative risk (sternotomy 2 months earlier) and good general clinical condition [2]. The decision on anticoagulant treatment remained challenging. On one hand, anticoagulation was necessary due to atrial fibrillation. On the other hand, it could compromise wall thickness by reducing the thrombus content of the aneurysm. Data on anticoagulant treatment in patients with pseudoaneurysms are scant. In our patient rivaroxaban led to partial recanalization of the pseudoaneurysm. However, discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment resulted in the formation of a device-related thrombus following Watchman device placement as well as a free-floating thrombus arising from the thrombosed aneurysm. Based on the risk-benefit assessment, the final decision was made to continue anticoagulation with rivaroxaban. During the 4 years of follow-up, the patient remained in good clinical condition.

Article information

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Funding: None.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, which allows downloading and sharing articles with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at polishheartjournal@ptkardio.pl.

REFERENCES

  1. Frances C, Romero A, Grady D. Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32(3): 557561, doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00290-3, indexed in Pubmed: 9741493.
  2. Yeo TC, Malouf JF, Oh JK, et al. Clinical profile and outcome in 52 patients with cardiac pseudoaneurysm. Ann Intern Med. 1998; 128(4): 299305, doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-4-199802150-00010, indexed in Pub­med: 9471934.
  3. López-Sendón J, González A, López de Sá E, et al. Diagnosis of subacute ventricular wall rupture after acute myocardial infarction: sensitivity and specificity of clinical, hemodynamic and echocardiographic criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 19(6): 11451153, doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90315-e, indexed in Pubmed: 1564213.
  4. Acharya D, Nagaraj H, Misra VK. Transcatheter closure of left ventricular pseudoaneurysm. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012; 24(6): E111E114, indexed in Pubmed: 22684390.
  5. Prifti E, Bonacchi M, Baboci A, et al. Surgical treatment of post-infarction left ventricular pseudoaneurysm: Case series highlighting various surgical strategies. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017; 16: 4451, doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.03.013, indexed in Pubmed: 28386394.