Vol 79, No 4 (2021)
Original article
Published online: 2021-03-03

open access

Page views 794
Article views/downloads 663
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Assessment of the implementation level of the guidelines for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in everyday clinical practice

Agata Krawczyk-Ożóg, Anna Płotek, Mateusz Hołda, Dariusz Dudek, Renata Rajtar-Salwa
Pubmed: 33687867
Kardiol Pol 2021;79(4):434-441.

Abstract

Background: The goal of secondary prevention is to hinder the recurrence of cardiovascular events in patients already diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases.

Aims: We aimed to assess the level of adherence to guidelines for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in everyday clinical practice.

Methods: This was a single‑center retrospective analysis of 460 consecutive rehospitalized patients previously diagnosed with coronary artery disease. The presence of main risk factors for cardiovascular disease was analyzed in this cohort.

Results: Overall, 80.7% of patients did not comply with the body mass index recommendations. Among nondiabetic patients, 43.5% exceeded the recommended blood glucose level and 55.5% of diabetic patients exceeded the recommended level of glycated hemoglobin. Total cholesterol level was higher than recommended in 13.5% of patients, the level of low‑density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was exceeded in 78.7% individuals, and the level of triglycerides was over the limit in 30.2% of patients. Systolic and / or diastolic blood pressure higher than or equal to 140/90 mm Hg was recorded in 41.3% of patients. Low level of physical activity was declared by 56.7% of the studied patients and 14.6% of them admitted to being current tobacco smokers. No patient fulfilled all of the main prevention goals (body weight, no smoking, LDL cholesterol level, glucose level, systolic and / or diastolic blood pressure) and in 10.2% of cases none of the above‑mentioned criteria were achieved. Significant difference in the implementation level of the guidelines was found between the sexes, with men showing lower adherence than women.

Conclusions: The level of adherence to the guidelines for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease was extremely low, with men being worse responders than women.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file