Vol 60, No 2 (2004)
Other
Published online: 2005-12-12
Acute myocardial infarction in the elderly. Is primary coronary angioplasty the treatment of choice? In-hospital follow-up results
DOI: 10.33963/v.kp.81951
Kardiol Pol 2004;60(2):100-103.
Abstract
Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the main causes of death in the elderly, however, the optimal therapy of AMI in this age-group has not yet been established.
Aim: To compare the early outcome of patients with AMI aged ≥75 years who underwent primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) or were treated conservatively.
Methods: In-hospital outcome of 180 patients aged ≥75 years, hospitalised due to AMI, was retrospectively analysed. Ninety two consecutive patients, admitted with AMI between May 2001 and October 2002, underwent primary PCI whereas 88 patients, treated for AMI between 1993 and 2002, received standard pharmacological therapy without thrombolysis.
Conclusions: Primary PCI in the elderly with AMI is significantly more effective than conservative therapy, except with patients with cardiogenic shock in whom mortality is similar regardless of the therapy used.
Aim: To compare the early outcome of patients with AMI aged ≥75 years who underwent primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) or were treated conservatively.
Methods: In-hospital outcome of 180 patients aged ≥75 years, hospitalised due to AMI, was retrospectively analysed. Ninety two consecutive patients, admitted with AMI between May 2001 and October 2002, underwent primary PCI whereas 88 patients, treated for AMI between 1993 and 2002, received standard pharmacological therapy without thrombolysis.
Conclusions: Primary PCI in the elderly with AMI is significantly more effective than conservative therapy, except with patients with cardiogenic shock in whom mortality is similar regardless of the therapy used.
Keywords: acute myocardial infarction - elderly - primary coronary angioplasty
