Vol 64, No 5 (2006)
Other
Published online: 2006-06-01

open access

Page views 384
Article views/downloads 625
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Original article
Transcoronary stem cell delivery using physiological endothelium-targeting perfusion technique: the rationale and a pilot study involving a comparison with conventional over-the-wire balloon coronary occlusions in patients after recent myocardial infarction

Piotr Musiałek, Wiesława Tracz, Aleksander Skotnicki, Krzysztof Żmudka, Piotr Pieniążek, Zbigniew Walter, Marta Szostek, Marcin Majka, Dorota Węglaska, Jarosław Zalewski, Maria Olszowska, Magdalena Kostkiewicz, Mieczysław Pasowicz, Piotr Klimeczek, Tadeusz Przewłocki
DOI: 10.33963/v.kp.81278
Kardiol Pol 2006;64(5):489-498.

Abstract

Introduction: Recent evidence shows poor efficacy of over-the-wire balloon catheter (OTW) coronary occlusive technique adopted widely for intracoronary bone marrow stem cell (BMSC) delivery. The waterfall effect of OTW-balloon inflation/deflation with reactive ł2-fold flow velocity increase might be partly responsible for poor BMSC retention. Aim: To evaluate the safety, feasibility and tolerability of perfusion-infusion BMSC delivery with the facilitation of cell rolling in contact with the coronary endothelium (a pre-requisite for downstream transmigration). Methods: We randomly assigned 11 patients (age 41-72 years) with first anterior myocardial infarction treated with PTCA+stent and LVEF ≤45% at 6-9 days to OTW in-stent occlusive (3 x 3 min.) BMSC delivery or cell infusion via a perfusion catheter with multiple side holes (SH-PC). Results: OTW and SH-PC patients had a similar infarct size (mean peak CK 4361 vs 4717 U/L), LVEF (41.2% vs 40.3%), infused mononuclear cell number (2.99 x 108 range 0.61-7.48 x 108 vs 3.28 x 108 range 1.64-4.39 x 108), CD 34+ number (1.79 x 106 vs 1.62 x 106), cell viability (91.5% vs 91.8%) and clonogenicity (CFU assay). None of the SH-PC, but 67% of OTW patients, had ST-segment elevation with chest pain (and nsVT in one) that limited OTW occlusion tolerance to 50-110 sec. At 6 months DLVEF in the OTW vs SH-PC patients was +4.2% (2-6) vs +8.8% (5-16) by MRI and +4.8 (2-7) vs +13.8% (2-24) by SPECT. Conclusions: Our work indicates that the SH-PC technique can be used safely for intracoronary BMSC transplantation. Further research is needed to determine whether the putative advantages of physiological SH-PC delivery translate into enhanced BMSC homing.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF (Polish) Download PDF file



Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska)