Online first
Original article
Published online: 2025-03-27

open access

Page views 67
Article views/downloads 17
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Zero-exchange workflow for cryoballoon ablation in pulmonary vein isolation using a direct over-the-needle transseptal access with the FlexCath sheath: A multicenter observational study

Piotr Denysiuk1, Marcin Szczasny1, Milena Stachyra1, Joanna Popiolek-Kalisz12, Magdalena Stadnik1, Jarosław Wojcik3, Piotr Blaszczak1, Andrzej Glowniak4

Abstract

Background: Transseptal puncture (TSP) is a crucial step during cryoballoon ablation (CBA) allowing for left atrium access. During the procedure an over-the-wire sheath exchange is required, which brings concerns about the exchange-related complications. An alternative option is performing the TSP through a steerable sheath and thus avoiding the exchange.

Aims: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of a simplified zero-exchange workflow for CBA procedure.

Methods: Patients undergoing CBA (with Arctic Front Advance Pro, Medtronic) at 3 centers in Poland were prospectively enrolled and assigned to the standard approach (N=62) or the no-exchange group (N=62). The TSP in the standard approach group was performed through a fixed-curve sheath that was exchanged for a 15F steerable sheath (FlexCath Advance, Medtronic). In the no-exchange group the puncture was performed through the steerable sheath.

Results: TSP was successfully performed in all patients. In the no-exchange group compared to the standard approach group the median (IQR) procedure time and left atrium dwell time were significantly shorter (75.0 (60.0 - 90.0) min vs 80.5 (70.0 - 100.0) min; P = 0.02 and 47 (40.0 - 56.0) min vs 51.5 (43.25 - 64.5) min, P = 0.04 , respectively) with comparable median (IQR) fluoroscopy time (14.0 (8.5 - 20.4) min vs 12.25 (10.0 - 17.6) min, P = 0.74). Only one potentially TSP-related complication has occurred in each group.

Conclusion: A direct TSP with the FlexCath Advance sheath is a feasible, safe and efficient alternative to the standard approach.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Andrade JG, Khairy P, Guerra PG, et al. Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review of published studies. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8(9): 1444–1451.
  2. Van Gelder IC, Rienstra M, Bunting KV, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2024; 45(36): 3314–3414.
  3. Russo G, Taramasso M, Maisano F. Transseptal puncture: Procedural guidance, challenging situations and management of complications. EuroIntervention. 2021; 17(9): 720–727.
  4. Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld EP, Kalman J, et al. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2024; 26(4): euae043.
  5. Denysiuk P, Denysiuk A, Szczasny M, et al. Transseptal puncture for left atrial access in invasive procedures — state of the art review. Acta Angiologica. 2024; 30(2): 79–91.
  6. Ströker E, De Greef Y, Schwagten B, et al. Over-the-needle trans-septal access using the cryoballoon delivery sheath and dilator in atrial fibrillation ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019; 42(7): 868–873.
  7. Yap SC, Bhagwandien RE, Szili-Torok T. Use of a novel integrated dilator-needle system in cryoballoon procedures: A zero-exchange approach. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022; 65(2): 527–534.
  8. Tomaiko E, Ahmad Z, Su W. Eliminating transseptal catheter exchange during cryoballoon ablation with the safesept transseptal guidewire in flexcath sheath. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73(9 Suppl 1): 429.
  9. Denysiuk P, Szczasny M, Głowniak A, et al. Zero‑exchange approach using a steerable FlexCath Advance sheath for direct transseptal access in cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation – case study. In Good Rythm. 2022; 2(63): 26–29.
  10. Bejinariu AG, Spieker M, Makimoto H, et al. A zero-exchange approach for left atrial access in pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024; 35(4): 688–693.
  11. Kueffer T, Madaffari A, Thalmann G, et al. Eliminating transseptal sheath exchange for pulsed field ablation procedures using a direct over-the-needle transseptal access with the Faradrive sheath. Europace. 2023; 25(4): 1500–1502.
  12. Marcus GM, Ren X, Tseng ZH, et al. Repeat transseptal catheterization after ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007; 18(1): 55–59.
  13. Hu YF, Tai CT, Lin YJ, et al. The change in the fluoroscopy-guided transseptal puncture site and difficult punctures in catheter ablation of recurrent atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2008; 10(3): 276–279.
  14. Tomlinson DR, Sabharwal N, Bashir Y, et al. Interatrial septum thickness and difficulty with transseptal puncture during redo catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008; 31(12): 1606–1611.
  15. Kaczmarek K, Kuniewicz M, Romanek J, et al. Real-world experience with cryoballoon ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation in Poland: 24-month outcomes from the Cryo Global Registry. Pol Heart J. 2024; 82(5): 540–542.
  16. Jiang J, Li J, Zhong G, et al. Efficacy and safety of the second-generation cryoballoons versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017; 48(1): 69–79.
  17. Glowniak A, Tarkowski A, Jaroszyńska A, et al. Transient symptomatic ST-segment elevation following transseptal puncture for pulmonary vein isolation. Prog Med. 2015; 28(8): 567–569.
  18. Brignole M, Aksu T, Calò L, et al. Clinical controversy: Methodology and indications of cardioneuroablation for reflex syncope. Europace. 2023; 25(5): euad033.
  19. Xiao FY, Ju WZ, Chen HW, et al. A comparative study of pericardial effusion and pleural effusion after cryoballoon ablation or radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020; 31(5): 1062–1067.
  20. Chierchia GB, Capulzini L, Droogmans S, et al. Pericardial effusion in atrial fibrillation ablation: A comparison between cryoballoon and radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2010; 12(3): 337–341.
  21. Glowniak A, Tarkowski A, Janczarek M, et al. Silent cerebral infarcts following pulmonary vein isolation with different atrial fibrillation ablation techniques — incidence and risk factors. Arch Med Sci. 2022; 18(3): 632–638.