Vol 83, No 1 (2025)
Editorial
Published online: 2025-01-13

open access

Page views 219
Article views/downloads 120
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Very high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation: Identifying its place in an electrophysiologist’s armamentarium

Dhiraj Gupta12, Mark T Mills12
Pubmed: 39821619
Pol Heart J 2025;83(1):5-7.

Abstract

Not available

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Richard Tilz R, Sano M, Vogler J, et al. Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation versus conventional power-controlled ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: The fast and furious — AF study. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021; 35: 100847.
  2. Wielandts JY, Kyriakopoulou M, Almorad A, et al. Prospective randomized evaluation of high power during CLOSE-guided pulmonary vein isolation: The POWER-AF study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021; 14(1): e009112.
  3. Calvert P, Ding WY, Mills MT, et al. Durability of thermal pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation assessed by mandated repeat invasive study. Heart Rhythm. 2024; 21(9): 1545–1554.
  4. Takigawa M, Kitamura T, Martin CA, et al. Temperature- and flow-controlled ablation/very-high-power short-duration ablation vs conventional power-controlled ablation: Comparison of focal and linear lesion characteristics. Heart Rhythm. 2021; 18(4): 553–561.
  5. Peller M, Dźwinacka J, Krzowski B, et al. Effectiveness of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation with ablation index-guided ablation compared with very-high-power, short-duration ablation: A retrospective, single-center study. Pol Heart J. 2025 [Epub ahead of print]; 83(1).
  6. Pérez-Pinzón J, Waks JW, Yungher D, et al. Predictors of first-pass isolation in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation: A retrospective cohort study. Heart Rhythm O2. 2024; 5(10): 713–719.
  7. Mueller J, Halbfass P, Sonne K, et al. Safety aspects of very high power very short duration atrial fibrillation ablation using a modified radiofrequency RF-generator: Single-center experience. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022; 33(5): 920–927.
  8. Calvert P, Koniari I, Mills MT, et al. Lesion metrics and 12-month outcomes of very-high power short duration radiofrequency ablation (90W/4 s) under mild conscious sedation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024; 35(6): 1165–1173.
  9. Heeger CH, Almorad A, Scherr D, et al. Temperature guided high and very high-power short duration ablation for atrial fibrillation treatment — The peQasus multicentre study. Europace. 2024 [Epub ahead of print]: euae284.
  10. Dello Russo A, Compagnucci P, Anselmino M, et al. Pulsed field vs very high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: Results of a multicenter, real-world experience. Heart Rhythm. 2024; 21(9): 1526–1536.
  11. Garcia R, Waldmann V, Vanduynhoven P, et al. Worldwide sedation strategies for atrial fibrillation ablation: Current status and evolution over the last decade. Europace. 2021; 23(12): 2039–2045.
  12. Chu G, Calvert P, Sidhu B, et al. Patient experience of very high power short duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation under mild conscious sedation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023; 66(2): 445–453.
  13. Calvert P, Mills MT, Murray B, et al. Feasibility of pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation under mild conscious sedation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 [Epub ahead of print].