Online first
Original article
Published online: 2024-11-13

open access

Page views 28
Article views/downloads 19
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Long-term outcome, mortality predictors and cardiac-device related infective endocarditis in patients with surgically corrected valvular versus non-valvular heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy

Ewa Jędrzejczyk-Patej1, Michał Mazurek1, Radosław Lenarczyk2, Adam Sokal3, Agnieszka Kotalczyk1, Wiktoria Kowalska1, Jakub Gumprecht1, Jacek Kowalczyk2, Patrycja Pruszkowska-Skrzep1, Oskar Kowalski3, Zbigniew Kalarus2

Abstract

Not available

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Anand IS, Carson P, Galle E, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces the risk of hospitalizations in patients with advanced heart failure: results from the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) trial. Circulation. 2009; 119(7): 969–977.
  2. Cleland JGF, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(15): 1539–1549.
  3. Tang ASL, Wells GA, Talajic M, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for mild-to-moderate heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(25): 2385–2395.
  4. Sipahi I, Carrigan TP, Rowland DY, et al. Impact of QRS duration on clinical event reduction with cardiac resynchronization therapy: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171(16): 1454–1462.
  5. Sipahi I, Chou JC, Hyden M, et al. Effect of QRS morphology on clinical event reduction with cardiac resynchronization therapy: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 2012; 163(2): 260–267.e3.
  6. Zareba W, Klein H, Cygankiewicz I, et al. Effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy by QRS morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT). Circulation. 2011; 123(10): 1061–1072.
  7. Arshad A, Moss AJ, Foster E, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy is more effective in women than in men: the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57(7): 813–820.
  8. Boriani G, Gasparini M, Landolina M, et al. Effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with valvular heart disease: comparison with patients affected by ischaemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy. The InSync/InSync ICD Italian Registry. Eur Heart J. 2009; 30(18): 2275–2283.
  9. Leyva F, Umar F, Taylor RJ, et al. The clinical outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy in post-surgical valvular cardiomyopathy. Europace. 2016; 18(5): 732–738.
  10. Bose A, Upadhyay GA, Kandala J, et al. Does prior valve surgery change outcome in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25(11): 1206–1213.
  11. Macías A, Gavira JJ, Castaño S, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy and valvular cardiomyopathy after corrective surgery. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008; 61(10): 1088–1091.
  12. Piccini JP, Passman R, Turakhia M, et al. Atrial fibrillation burden, progression, and the risk of death: a case-crossover analysis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Europace. 2019; 21(3): 404–413.
  13. Wilton SB, Leung AA, Ghali WA, et al. Outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with versus those without atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8(7): 1088–1094.
  14. Gupta S, Belley-Cote EP, Sarkaria A, et al. International normalized ratio targets for left-sided mechanical valve replacement. Thromb Haemost. 2018; 118(5): 906–913.
  15. Poli D, Antonucci E, Pengo V, et al. Mechanical prosthetic heart valves: Quality of anticoagulation and thromboembolic risk. The observational multicenter PLECTRUM study. Int J Cardiol. 2018; 267: 68–73.
  16. Scheggi V, Merilli I, Marcucci R, et al. Predictors of mortality and adverse events in patients with infective endocarditis: A retrospective real world study in a surgical centre. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021; 21(1): 28.
  17. Orzech JW, Zatorska K, Grabowski M, et al. Preliminary results from the Polish Infective Endocarditis Registry (POL-ENDO): Time to change clinical practice? Kardiol Pol. 2024; 82(6): 609–616.
  18. Jędrzejczyk-Patej E, Mazurek M, Kowalski O, et al. Device-related infective endocarditis in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients — Single center registry with over 2500 person-years follow up. Int J Cardiol. 2017; 227: 18–24.
  19. Jędrzejczyk-Patej E, Mazurek M, Kotalczyk A, et al. Upgrade from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator vs. de novo implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: long-term outcomes. Europace. 2021; 23(1): 113–122.
  20. Morawiec R, Matuszewska-Brycht O, Maeser P, et al. Decreasing numbers of valve-related infective endocarditis cases. An urgent call to action to improve diagnostic pathways: A retrospective tertiary center perspective (2015–2022). Kardiol Pol. 2024; 82(1): 79–81.
  21. Martínez-Sellés M, Muñoz P, Estevez A, et al. Long-term outcome of infective endocarditis in non-intravenous drug users. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008; 83(11): 1213–1217.
  22. Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: Developed by the Task Force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021; 43(7): 561–632.