Online first
Short communication
Published online: 2024-10-01

open access

Page views 72
Article views/downloads 46
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Temporal trends in in-hospital mortality of 7 628 patients with myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock treated in the years 2006–2021. An analysis from the SILCARD Database

Przemysław Trzeciak1, Mateusz Tajstra1, Wojciech Wojakowski2, Daniel Cieśla3, Zbigniew Kalarus45, Krzysztof Milewski6, Tomasz Hrapkowicz7, Katarzyna Mizia-Stec89, Grzegorz Smolka810, Klaudiusz Nadolny11, Marek Deja12, Tomasz Kukulski13, Krzysztof Wilczek1, Jacek Kowalczyk45, Andrzej Bochenek1415, Piotr Przybyłowski7, Krystian Wita16, Mariusz Gąsior1

Abstract

Not available

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(14): 1287–1296.
  2. Mebazaa A, Combes A, van Diepen S, et al. Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction. Intensive Care Med. 2018; 44(6): 760–773.
  3. Thiele H, Ohman EM, de Waha-Thiele S, et al. Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: an update 2019. Eur Heart J. 2019; 40(32): 2671–2683.
  4. Osman M, Syed M, Patibandla S, et al. Fifteen-year trends in incidence of cardiogenic shock hospitalization and in-hospital mortality in the United States. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021; 10(15): e021061.
  5. Schrage B, Becher PM, Goßling A, et al. Temporal trends in incidence, causes, use of mechanical circulatory support and mortality in cardiogenic shock. ESC Heart Fail. 2021; 8(2): 1295–1303.
  6. Redfors B, Angerås O, Råmunddal T, et al. 17-year trends in incidence and prognosis of cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction in western Sweden. Int J Cardiol. 2015; 185: 256–262.
  7. Wayangankar SA, Bangalore S, McCoy LA, et al. Temporal trends and outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions for cardiogenic shock in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: a report from the CathPCI Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9(4): 341–351.
  8. Gąsior M, Pres D, Wojakowski W, et al. Causes of hospitalization and prognosis in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Secular trends in the years 2006-2014 according to the SILesian CARDiovascular (SILCARD) database. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2016; 126(10): 754–762.
  9. Dzavik V, Sleeper LA, Picard MH, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341(9): 625–634.
  10. Thiele H, Møller JE, Henriques JPS, et al. Extracorporeal life support in infarct-related cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2023; 389(14): 1286–1297.
  11. Gąsior M, Tajstra M, Cieśla D, et al. Management of patients with myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Data from a comprehensive all-comer administrative database covering a population of 4.4 million. Pol Heart J. 2024; 82(5): 534–536.
  12. Trzeciak P, Stępińska J, Gil R, et al. Management of myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Expert opinion of the Association of Intensive Cardiac Care and Association of Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Society of Cardiology. Kardiol Pol. 2023; 81(12): 1312–1324.
  13. Rab T, Ratanapo S, Kern K, et al. Cardiac shock care centers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72(16): 1972–1980.