Vol 82, No 9 (2024)
Editorial
Published online: 2024-08-29

open access

Page views 249
Article views/downloads 164
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Statin discontinuation: How can we improve on the multiple pathways that contribute to suboptimal statin adherence?

Dan Atar12, John Munkhaugen34, Elise Sverre3
Pubmed: 39240921
Pol Heart J 2024;82(9):828-830.

Abstract

Not available

EDITORIAL

Statin discontinuation: How can we improve on the multiple pathways that contribute to suboptimal statin adherence?

Dan Atar12John Munkhaugen34Elise Sverre3
1Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Ulleval, Oslo, Norway
2Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
3Department of Medicine, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Trust, Drammen, Norway
4Department of Behavioral Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Related article

by Kardas et al.

Correspondence to:

Prof. Dan Atar, MD,

Department of Cardiology,

Oslo University Hospital,

Oslo, Norway,

phone: +47 221 191 87,

e-mail: danat@uio.no

Copyright by the Author(s), 2024

DOI: 10.33963/v.phj.102335

Received: August 29, 2024

Accepted: August 29, 2024

Early publication date: August 29, 2024

Discontinuation of statin therapy remains a significant challenge (encountered in 15%–75% of cases) following coronary heart disease (CHD) events [1] associated with unfavorably elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) [2] and recurrent cardiovascular events [1, 3]. Despite strong scientific evidence for LDL-C reduction with lipid-lowering drugs, less than 30% of patients with CHD across Europe achieve the conservative LDL-C treatment target of <70 mg/dl (1.8 mmol/l) [4] in daily clinical practice. Regrettably, only 20% of patients included in a Polish post-myocardial infarction (MI) treatment program had an LDL-C level below the currently recommended target of <55 mg/dl (1.4 mmol/l) [5]. This emphasizes the need for novel strategies to improve lipid management [5–7].

According to the categorization by the European Society of Cardiology based on cardiovascular mortality rates [6], Poland is a high-risk country, and so measures to improve the management of CHD are particularly important [6, 8]. As an attempt to improve secondary prevention and to harmonize variations in care provided in clinical practice throughout Poland, a nationwide coordinated care program, KOS-Zawał, was introduced in 2017 [9]. This publicly funded program includes an individual care plan, inpatient or ambulatory cardiac rehabilitation or a combination thereof, a minimum of three cardiological consultations over 12 months, and a specialist consultation at the end of the program [9]. Participants receive education on coronary risk factors and lifestyle modifications and are offered psychological counselling organized by a dedicated coordinator [9]. Interestingly, the program also uses financial incentives for hospitals to participate, such as bonus payments in regard of patients who return to work within 4 months of discharge, or for achieving LDL-C goals of <1.4 mmol/l in more than 40% of the patients [9, 10].

In the current issue of Polish Heart Journal (Kardiol Pol), Kardas et al. [10] report on this program. More specifically, they compare statin adherence using prescription data from the whole of 2022 in a large cohort of patients with CHD according to their participation in KOS-Zawał [10]. This cohort included 214 649 patients surviving an MI and/or revascularization procedure, of whom 28 128 (13%) participated in the KOS-Zawał program. Program participation was associated with an impressive 50% relative reduction in the risk of statin discontinuation, defined as a treatment gap of 60 days, i.e., no refill of medication until 60 days after the previous prescription has run out. In all, 19% of patients discontinued statins with standard care, compared to 11% of KOS-Zawał participants. The discontinuation rate in the total population was higher in women and in younger individuals, whereas data on other clinical characteristics was not available.

The Polish health authorities should be commended for implementing a comprehensive and ambitious secondary preventive program, and a 50% relative reduction in statin discontinuation is indeed impressive. Notwithstanding this however, their finding of 11% of KOS-Zawał participants discontinuing their statin prescription underscores the need to identify barriers and to further optimize the program. A even more pressing task perhaps is to make the KOS-Zawał program available to all CHD patients. Kardas et al. [10] report a participation rate of 25% of patients with MI in 2022. It is a well-established challenge to increase participation rates in such programs, and in particular to motivate patients who are at the highest risk [6, 7]. In a study with 3 years of follow-up data, the participants in the KOS-Zawał program were younger, more often men, had fewer comorbidities, and more often had ST-elevation MI rather than non-ST elevation MI, than those who declined to participate [11], illustrating this challenge. Nevertheless, this program is an important public health measure for patients with CHD in Poland and should serve as an inspiration for other countries to equally prioritize secondary prevention.

Somatic comorbidities, polypharmacy, a complex dose regime, perceived side effects, living alone, poor health literacy, depression, and a poor doctor-patient relationship are all factors that may contribute to poor statin adherence [6, 7, 12]. It would have been useful to know the distribution of these factors among program participants and non-participants [10]. Due to the non-randomized design, differences in sociodemographic factors or other important patient characteristics between program participants and non-participants could potentially explain the main result. The definition of ‘statin discontinuation’, i.e., the gap between prescriptions of 60 days used in the study by Kardas et al., is somewhat short [3] and may be affected by changes in medication and/or doses. It would therefore also be interesting to investigate gaps of 90 and 180 days.

The most recent Cochrane review on adherence to lipid-lowering medication concluded that intensification of follow-up care was a promising strategy to improve adherence to treatment [13]. Indeed, studies involving healthcare delivery systems (a term which applies to the KOS-Zawał program) [9] have proved to have positive effects on statin adherence [13]. Other factors with documented effects on long-term adherence to lipid-lowering drugs include simplification of medication and the dose regime, patient education, and reminders in various forms [6, 12, 13].

Kardas et al. propose to implement digital solutions to provide: I) reminders of medication intake and II) the need to collect medication from the pharmacy, as well as III) alerts to physicians to identify patients who do not collect their prescribed medications. To what degree digital solutions might improve adherence to statins will probably depend on the given solution, but there is already some evidence for a favorable effect of digital solutions, and it is recommended these be considered in the latest European preventive guidelines [6]. Self-perceived statin side effects are an important cause of reduced adherence and discontinuation [6]. As illustrated by the Samson trial [14], it is important to deal with the nocebo phenomenon through patient-centered communication, assistance from pharmacies, and information campaigns. In addition, we now have alternative lipid-lowering drugs (e.g., ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors and bempedoic acid) at our disposal for those who (really) do not tolerate statins [6].

The authors should be complimented on their ambition to fine-tune the KOS-Zawał program [10], even though discontinuation rates of 11% are low compared to most international data [1] and many intervention studies [13]. The KOS-Zawał program is an inspiring public health initiative [9, 10] for other countries to follow. However, as pointed out by the authors, the cost of the program is substantial [10], and national health economic analyses are therefore required before adaptation [6].

Article information

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Funding: None.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, which allows downloading and sharing articles with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at polishheartjournal@ptkardio.pl

REFERENCES

  1. De Vera MA, Bhole V, Burns LC, et al. Impact of statin adherence on cardiovascular disease and mortality outcomes: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014; 78(4): 684698, doi: 10.1111/bcp.12339, indexed in Pubmed: 25364801.
  2. Munkhaugen J, Sverre E, Otterstad JE, et al. Medical and psychosocial factors and unfavourable low-density lipoprotein cholesterol control in coronary patients. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017; 24(9): 981989, doi: 10.1177/2047487317693134, indexed in Pubmed: 28196429.
  3. Chowdhury R, Khan H, Heydon E, et al. Adherence to cardiovascular therapy: a meta-analysis of prevalence and clinical consequences. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34(38): 29402948, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht295, indexed in Pubmed: 23907142.
  4. De Backer G, Jankowski P, Kotseva K, et al. Management of dyslipidaemia in patients with coronary heart disease: Results from the ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V survey in 27 countries. Atherosclerosis. 2019; 285: 135146, doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.03.014, indexed in Pubmed: 31054483.
  5. Nowowiejska-Wiewióra A, Wita K, Mędrala Z, et al. Dyslipidemia treatment and attainment of LDL-cholesterol treatment goals in patients participating in the Managed Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction Survivors program. Kardiol Pol. 2023; 81(4): 359365, doi: 10.33963/KP.a2023.0045, indexed in Pubmed: 36871294.
  6. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(34): 32273337, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484, indexed in Pubmed: 34458905.
  7. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41(1): 111188, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455, indexed in Pubmed: 31504418.
  8. Mannsverk J, Wilsgaard T, Mathiesen EB, et al. Trends in modifiable risk factors are associated with declining incidence of hospitalized and nonhospitalized acute coronary heart disease in a population. Circulation. 2016; 133(1): 7481, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016960, indexed in Pubmed: 26582781.
  9. Sagan A, Rogala M, Buszman PP, et al. Improved coordination of care after acute myocardial infarction in Poland since 2017: Promising early results. Health Policy. 2021; 125(5): 587592, doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.03.010, indexed in Pubmed: 33832777.
  10. Kardas P, Kwiatek A, Włodarczyk P, et al. Is the KOS-Zawał coordinated care program effective in reducing long-term cardiovascular risk in coronary artery disease patients in Poland? Insights from analysis of statin persistence in a nationwide cohort. Pol Heart J. 2024; 82(9): 852860, doi: 10.33963/v.phj.101307, indexed in Pubmed: 38988238.
  11. Kolarczyk-Haczyk A, Konopko M, Mazur M, et al. Long-term outcomes of the Coordinated Care Program in Patients after Myocardial Infarction (KOS-MI). Kardiol Pol. 2023; 81(6): 587596, doi: 10.33963/KP.a2023.0091, indexed in Pubmed: 37096947.
  12. Anderson LJ, Nuckols TK, Coles C, et al. A systematic overview of systematic reviews evaluating medication adherence interventions. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020; 77(2): 138147, doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz284, indexed in Pubmed: 31901098.
  13. van Driel ML, Morledge MD, Ulep R, et al. Interventions to improve adherence to lipid-lowering medication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 12(12): CD004371, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004371.pub4, indexed in Pubmed: 28000212.
  14. Howard JP, Wood FA, Finegold JA, et al. Side effect patterns in a crossover trial of statin, placebo, and no treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021; 78(12): 12101222, doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.022, indexed in Pubmed: 34531021.