Online first
Review paper
Published online: 2024-08-01

open access

Page views 276
Article views/downloads 154
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Can CYP2C19 genotyping improve antiplatelet therapy efficacy in real-life practice? Recent advances

Udaya S Tantry1, Sahib Singh1, Lekshmi Narayan Raghavakurup1, Kevin P Bliden1, Paul A Gurbel1

Abstract

Clopidogrel remains the most widely used P2Y12 receptor inhibitor worldwide and is often used in combination with aspirin for secondary prevention in patients with arterial disease. The drug is associated with a wide response variability with one on three patients exhibiting little or no inhibition of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation. It is a prodrug that is mainly metabolized by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19. Patients who carry a CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LoF) allele have reduced metabolism of clopidogrel that is associated with reduced platelet inhibition compared to non-carriers that is associated with increased risk for thrombotic event occurrences, particularly, stent thrombosis. The United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) issued a black box warning in the clopidogrel label highlighting the importance of presence of CYP2C19 LOF allele during the insufficient metabolism of clopidogrel and availability of other potent P2Y12 inhibitor for the treatment in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers. Clinical trials have conclusively demonstrated greater anti-ischemic benefits of prasugrel/ticagrelor in the treatment of patients carrying the CYP2C19 LoF allele. However, uniform use of these more potent P2Y12 inhibitors has been associated with greater bleeding and cost, and lower adherence. The latter information provides a strong rationale for personalizing P2Y12 inhibitor therapy based on the laboratory determination of CYP2C19 genotype. However, cardiologists have been slow to take up pharmacogenetic testing possibly due to lack of provider and patient education, clear cardiology guidelines and, and lack of positive results from adequately sized randomized clinical trials. However, current evidence strongly supports genotyping of patients who are candidates for clopidogrel. Physicians should strongly consider performing genetic tests to identify LoF carriers and treat these patients with more pharmacodynamically predictable P2Y12 inhibitors than clopidogrel.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Gurbel PA, Tantry US. Combination antithrombotic therapies. Circulation. 2010; 121(4): 569–583.
  2. Gurbel PA, Kuliopulos A, Tantry US. G-protein-coupled receptors signaling pathways in new antiplatelet drug development. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015; 35(3): 500–512.
  3. Gurbel PA, Tantry US. Drug insight: Clopidogrel nonresponsiveness. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2006; 3(7): 387–395.
  4. Zhang J, Zhang K, Gao ZG, et al. Agonist-bound structure of the human P2Y12 receptor. Nature. 2014; 509(7498): 119–122.
  5. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Hiatt BL, et al. Clopidogrel for coronary stenting: response variability, drug resistance, and the effect of pretreatment platelet reactivity. Circulation. 2003; 107(23): 2908–2913.
  6. Tantry US, Bliden KP, Gurbel PA. What is the best measure of thrombotic risks — pretreatment platelet aggregation, clopidogrel responsiveness, or posttreatment platelet aggregation? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005; 66(4): 597–598.
  7. Bonello L, Tantry US, Marcucci R, et al. Working group on high on-treatment platelet reactivity. Consensus and future directions on the definition of high on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56(12): 919–933.
  8. Gurbel PA, Tantry US, Shuldiner AR, et al. Genotyping: one piece of the puzzle to personalize antiplatelet therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56(2): 112–116.
  9. Shuldiner AR, O'Connell JR, Bliden KP, et al. Association of cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype with the antiplatelet effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel therapy. JAMA. 2009; 302(8): 849–857.
  10. Gurbel PA, Shuldiner AR, Bliden KP, et al. The relation between CYP2C19 genotype and phenotype in stented patients on maintenance dual antiplatelet therapy. Am Heart J. 2011; 161(3): 598–604.
  11. Mega JL, Simon T, Collet JP, et al. Reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients treated with clopidogrel predominantly for PCI: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010; 304(16): 1821–1830.
  12. Beitelshees AL, Horenstein RB, Vesely MR, et al. Pharmacogenetics and clopidogrel response in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 89(3): 455–459.
  13. Lee CR, Luzum JA, Sangkuhl K, et al. Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guideline for CYP2C19 genotype and clopidogrel therapy: 2022 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022; 112(5): 959–967.
  14. Jeong YH, Tantry US, Gurbel P. What is the “East Asian Paradox”? Cardiosource Interventional News. 2012; 1: 38–39.
  15. Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD, et al. Cytochrome P450 genetic polymorphisms and the response to prasugrel: relationship to pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical outcomes. Circulation. 2009; 119(19): 2553–2560.
  16. Wallentin L, James S, Storey RF, et al. Effect of CYP2C19 and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on outcomes of treatment with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes: a genetic substudy of the PLATO trial. Lancet. 2010; 376(9749): 1320–1328.
  17. Lewis JP, Backman JD, Reny JL, et al. Pharmacogenomic polygenic response score predicts ischaemic events and cardiovascular mortality in clopidogrel-treated patients. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020; 6(4): 203–210.
  18. Gurbel PA, Tantry US. Do platelet function testing and genotyping improve outcome in patients treated with antithrombotic agents?: Platelet function testing and genotyping improve outcome in patients treated with antithrombotic agents. Circulation. 2012; 125(10): 1276–1287.
  19. Claassens DMF, Vos GJA, Bergmeijer TO, et al. A genotype-guided strategy for oral P2Y inhibitors in primary PCI. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381(17): 1621–1631.
  20. Pereira NL, Farkouh ME, So D, et al. Effect of genotype-guided oral P2Y12 inhibitor selection vs conventional clopidogrel therapy on ischemic outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: the TAILOR-PCI randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020; 324(8): 761–771.
  21. Pereira NL, Rihal C, Lennon R, et al. Effect of CYP2C19 genotype on ischemic outcomes during oral p2y inhibitor therapy: A meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 14(7): 739–750.
  22. Gross L, Trenk D, Jacobshagen C, et al. Genotype-phenotype association and impact on outcomes following guided de-escalation of anti-platelet treatment in acute coronary syndrome patients: The TROPICAL-ACS genotyping substudy. Thromb Haemost. 2018; 118(9): 1656–1667.
  23. Ingraham BS, Farkouh ME, Lennon RJ, et al. Genetic-guided oral P2Y inhibitor selection and cumulative ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023; 16(7): 816–825.
  24. Beitelshees AL, Thomas CD, Empey PE, et al. Genotype-Guided antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in diverse clinical settings. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022; 11(4): e024159.
  25. Lee CR, Thomas CD, Beitelshees AL, et al. Impact of the CYP2C19*17 allele on outcomes in patients receiving genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021; 109(3): 705–715.
  26. Lyu SQ, Zhu J, Wang J, et al. Utility of a pharmacogenetic-driven algorithm in guiding dual antiplatelet therapy for patients undergoing coronary drug-eluting stent implantation in China. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022; 78(2): 215–225.
  27. Wang Y, Meng X, Wang A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers with stroke or TIA. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385(27): 2520–2530.
  28. Xie X, Johnston SC, Wang A, et al. Association of CYP2C19 loss-of-function metabolizer status with stroke risk among Chinese patients treated with ticagrelor-aspirin vs clopidogrel-aspirin: A prespecified secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(6): e2317037.
  29. Wang A, Tian X, Xie X, et al. Ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin among loss-of-function carriers with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack in relation to renal function: A post hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial. Ann Intern Med. 2022; 175(11): 1534–1542.
  30. Wang C, Jia W, Jing J, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in minor stroke or transient ischemic attack with intracranial artery stenosis: A post hoc analysis of CHANCE-2. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023; 12(21): e031611.
  31. Liu H, Jing J, Wang A, et al. Genotype-guided dual antiplatelet therapy in minor stroke or transient ischemic attack with a single small subcortical infarction. Neurology. 2023; 100(16): e1643–e1654.
  32. Wang A, Tian X, Xie X, et al. Effects of remnant cholesterol on the efficacy of genotype-guided dual antiplatelet in CYP2C19 loss-of -function carriers with minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a post-hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial. eClinicalMedicine. 2024; 67: 102357.
  33. Pan Y, Meng X, Jin A, et al. Time course for benefit and risk with ticagrelor and aspirin in individuals with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack who carry CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles: A secondary analysis of the CHANCE-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2022; 79(8): 739–745.
  34. Meng X, Wang A, Tian X, et al. One-Year outcomes of early therapy with ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in loss-of-function carriers with stroke or TIA trial. Neurology. 2024; 102(3): e207809.
  35. Han M, Jia W, Wu Y, et al. Short-term efficacy and safety of personalized antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack: A randomized clinical trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023; 89(9): 2813–2824.
  36. Zhang X, Jiang S, Xue J, et al. Personalized antiplatelet therapy guided by clopidogrel pharmacogenomics in acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13: 931405.
  37. Cargnin S, Ferrari F, Terrazzino S. Impact of CYP2C19 genotype on efficacy and safety of clopidogrel-based antiplatelet therapy in stroke or transient ischemic attack patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of non-east asian studies. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 [Epub ahead of print].
  38. FDA Drug Safety Communication: Reduced effectiveness of Plavix (clopidogrel) in patients who are poor metabolizers of the drug. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/fda-drug-safety-communication-reduced-effectiveness-plavix-clopidogrel-patients-who-are-poor#:~:text=FDA%20recommends%20that%20healthcare%20professionals,is%20reduced%20in%20these%20patients (accessed: July 30, 2024).
  39. Wright RS, Anderson JL, Adams CD, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 guideline). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57(19): 1920–1959.
  40. Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST‐segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(14): 1289–1367.
  41. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. et al.. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023; 44(38): 3720–3826.
  42. Koshy AN, Giustino G, Sartori S, et al. Ticagrelor or prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic coronary syndromes. EuroIntervention. 2023; 18(15): 1244–1253.
  43. Ijaz SH, Baron SJ, Shahnawaz A, et al. Utilization trends in platelet adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and cost among medicare beneficiaries. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023; 48(5): 101608.
  44. Wang Y, Cavallari LH, Brown JD, et al. Assessing the clinical treatment dynamics of antiplatelet therapy following acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(4): e238585.
  45. Pereira NL, Cresci S, Angiolillo DJ, et al. Genetic Testing for Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Therapy: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2024 [Epub ahead of print].
  46. Multi-partner grant awarded for the validation of Genedrive® CYP2C19 ID Kit in time critical NHS settings. http://www.genedriveplc.com/press-releases/gdr_-_devote_(16.06.23).pdf (accessed: July 30, 2024).
  47. Gurbel PA, Bliden K, Sherwood M, et al. Development of a routine bedside CYP2C19 genotype assessment program for antiplatelet therapy guidance in a community hospital catheterization laboratory. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024; 57(4): 566–575.