open access

Vol 13, No 4 (2019)
Review paper
Published online: 2020-01-03
Get Citation

Selected aspects of advance care planning according to Polish legal regulations — physician’s requirements

Leszek Pawłowski, Aleksandra Modlińska, Monika Lichodziejewska-Niemierko
DOI: 10.5603/PMPI.2019.0023
·
Palliat Med Pract 2019;13(4):197-203.

open access

Vol 13, No 4 (2019)
Review articles
Published online: 2020-01-03

Abstract

In 2017, the group of 109 experts from various countries developed the international consensus definition
of advance care planning (ACP), which is defined as enabling individuals to define objectives and preferences
for future medical treatment and care, to discuss these goals and preferences with family and healthcare
providers, and to record and review these preferences if appropriate. ACP plays a significant role in the
care of patients with chronic diseases, and especially may have an impact on the situation of palliative
care patients, their families and healthcare professionals who look after them.
This article analyses the legal constraints of ACP in Poland, and presents legal regulations related to some
selected issues of ACP. One of the essential features of ACP is disclosing information to the patient and
taking into account the patient’s decisions concerning the treatment and medical care. This is provided
for in Polish law and healthcare professionals are obliged to observe it. Moreover, the Polish law includes
broad principles applying to providing the patient’s family with information about diagnosis and prognosis
of the disease. However, advance directives and health care proxy have not been regulated by national
law yet. Therefore, it seems that the incorporation of ACP into Polish healthcare system requires the development
of new legal regulations.

Abstract

In 2017, the group of 109 experts from various countries developed the international consensus definition
of advance care planning (ACP), which is defined as enabling individuals to define objectives and preferences
for future medical treatment and care, to discuss these goals and preferences with family and healthcare
providers, and to record and review these preferences if appropriate. ACP plays a significant role in the
care of patients with chronic diseases, and especially may have an impact on the situation of palliative
care patients, their families and healthcare professionals who look after them.
This article analyses the legal constraints of ACP in Poland, and presents legal regulations related to some
selected issues of ACP. One of the essential features of ACP is disclosing information to the patient and
taking into account the patient’s decisions concerning the treatment and medical care. This is provided
for in Polish law and healthcare professionals are obliged to observe it. Moreover, the Polish law includes
broad principles applying to providing the patient’s family with information about diagnosis and prognosis
of the disease. However, advance directives and health care proxy have not been regulated by national
law yet. Therefore, it seems that the incorporation of ACP into Polish healthcare system requires the development
of new legal regulations.

Get Citation

Keywords

advance care planning, legislation and jurisprudence, informed consent, Poland

About this article
Title

Selected aspects of advance care planning according to Polish legal regulations — physician’s requirements

Journal

Palliative Medicine in Practice

Issue

Vol 13, No 4 (2019)

Article type

Review paper

Pages

197-203

Published online

2020-01-03

DOI

10.5603/PMPI.2019.0023

Bibliographic record

Palliat Med Pract 2019;13(4):197-203.

Keywords

advance care planning
legislation and jurisprudence
informed consent
Poland

Authors

Leszek Pawłowski
Aleksandra Modlińska
Monika Lichodziejewska-Niemierko

References (20)
  1. Rietjens J, Sudore R, Connolly M, et al. Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care. The Lancet Oncology. 2017; 18(9): e543–e551.
  2. Kochan, K., Grądalski, T. Legal and ethical problems within palliative care for an incompetent patient. Palliative Medicine. 2015; 7(4): 223–227.
  3. Grądalski, T., Kochan, K. Incompetent terminal patients’ key carers expectations. Palliative Medicine. 2017; 9(1): 21–29.
  4. Wesołek, E. Availability of palliative and hospice care for patients staying in nursing homes and long-term care facilities — rationale, possibilities and barriers. Palliative Medicine in Practice. 2016; 10(3): 112–118.
  5. Krakowiak P., Paczkowska, A. Włączanie skazanych do wolontariatu opieki paliatywno-hospicyjnej na świecie i w Polsce. Dobre praktykłpracy systemu penitencjarnego ze środowiskiem opieki paliatywno-hospicyjnej w Polsce. Probacja. 2014; 2: 47–64.
  6. Grądalski, T., Smyczyńska, M. Deactivation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator at end of life. Palliative Medicine. 2015; 7(3): 201–204.
  7. Sabatino CP. The evolution of health care advance planning law and policy. Milbank Q. 2010; 88(2): 211–239.
  8. Pawłowski L. Problemy prawne w opiece paliatywnej. In: de Walden-Gałuszko K, Ciałkowska-Rysz A. ed. Medycyna Paliatywna. Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL, Warszawa 2015: 445–456.
  9. Bujny J. Advance Medical Directives of Jehovah’s Witnesses: legal aspects. Anestezjol Ratow. 2008; 2: 195–200.
  10. Janiszewska B. Praktyczne problemy oświadczeń pro futuro (uwagi po rozstrzygnięciu sprawy). Prawo i Medycyna. 2009; 4: 46–60.
  11. Liszewska A. Criminal Responsibility for Medical Treatment Provided Without a Patient's Consent (Selected Aspects). Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica. 2015; 74: 71–82.
  12. Bołoz W, Krajnik M, Adamczyk A. The definition of overzealous therapy. The consensus of the Polish Working Group on End-of-Life Ethics. Adv Palliat Med. 2008; 7(3): 91–92.
  13. Smyk K. Legal character of the patient's consent in civil law. Folia Iuridica Universitatis Wratislaviensis. 2017; 6(1): 121–138.
  14. Szeroczyńska M, Czarkowski M, Krajnik M, et al. Institution of the health care agent in Polish legislation: position of the Polish Working Group on End-of-Life Ethics. Polish Archives of Internal Medicine. 2016; 126(5): 313–320.
  15. Szeroczyńska M, Czarkowski M, Krajnik M, et al. Instytucja pełnomocnika medycznego w Polsce – stanowisko Polskiej Grupy Roboczej ds. Problemów Etycznych Końca Życia. Med Prakt. 2016; 330(5): 102–111.
  16. Zurzycka P, Czyżowicz K, Repka I. The institution of the health care agent vs. nursing practice — an outline of issues. Probl Piel. 2018; 26(1): 64–68.
  17. Baron K. Zgoda pacjenta. Prokuratura i Prawo. 2010; 9: 42–57.
  18. Pawłowski L. Close person in the light of giving information concerning patient’s state of health (part 2). Forum Medycyny Rodzinnej. 2014; 8(4): 195–200.
  19. Karkowska, D. Ustawa o prawach pacjenta i Rzeczniku Praw Pacjenta: Komentarz. [Act on Patient Rights and the Patient Rights Ombudsman: Commentary]. Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2012: 169.
  20. Niemczyk S, Łazarska A. Materialnoprawne elementy aktu zgody pacjenta w ujęciu prawnym i medycznym. Prawo i Medycyna. 2005; 19(7): 48–65.

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

Czasopismo Medycyna Paliatywna w Praktyce dostęne jest również w Ikamed - księgarnia medyczna

Wydawcą serwisu jest  "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl