open access

Vol 7 (2022): Continuous Publishing
Original paper
Published online: 2022-09-05
Get Citation

Factors associated with uncorrected refractive errors in school-going adolescents in Kakamega County, Kenya

Emmanuel E. Okenwa-Vincent1, Jyoti Naidoo2, Peter Clarke-Farr3
·
Ophthalmol J 2022;7:152-162.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kakamega, Kenya
  2. African Vision Research Institute, Department of Optometry, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
  3. Department of Ophthalmic Sciences, Faculty of Health and Wellness Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa

open access

Vol 7 (2022): Continuous Publishing
ORIGINAL PAPERS
Published online: 2022-09-05

Abstract

Background: Uncorrected refractive errors (URE) present an enormous burden on children in Kenya. The study investigated factors associated with URE in school-going adolescents in Kakamega County, Kenya.

Material and methods: An observational, cross-sectional study with multistage sampling was conducted with randomly selected secondary school students in forms one to four. Comprehensive clinical examinations conducted by optometrists were used to determine participants’ URE types and dioptric strength. Structured pre-validated questionnaires were administered to participants to elicit information on their sociodemographic and socioeconomic statuses.

Results: A total of 165 students, aged 17.45 ± 1.44 years, with URE classified into myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism, participated in the study. There were more males (57%) than females in this study, and most participants had astigmatism (52%). The study found no-to-weak association between predefined factors and URE. While males had decreased odds [odds ratio (OR): 0.557, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.211–1.470] for myopia than astigmatism, the converse was true for hyperopia (OR: 1.165, 95% CI: 0.385–3.524) compared with astigmatism. Even though participants from families with lower affluence and living in rural settings had up to 18 times increased odds (OR: 18.699, 95% CI: 0.840–416.442) for myopia than astigmatism and hyperopia, significant dioptric power was less likely to be present in those with myopia (OR: 0.529, 95% CI: 0.165–1.698) and hyperopia (OR: 0.011, 95% CI: 0.001–0.192).

Conclusions: URE may not be significantly associated with school-going adolescents’ sociodemographic and socioeconomic
statuses. However, myopia and astigmatism are increasingly likely to be present among participants from families with lower affluence and living in rural settings.

Abstract

Background: Uncorrected refractive errors (URE) present an enormous burden on children in Kenya. The study investigated factors associated with URE in school-going adolescents in Kakamega County, Kenya.

Material and methods: An observational, cross-sectional study with multistage sampling was conducted with randomly selected secondary school students in forms one to four. Comprehensive clinical examinations conducted by optometrists were used to determine participants’ URE types and dioptric strength. Structured pre-validated questionnaires were administered to participants to elicit information on their sociodemographic and socioeconomic statuses.

Results: A total of 165 students, aged 17.45 ± 1.44 years, with URE classified into myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism, participated in the study. There were more males (57%) than females in this study, and most participants had astigmatism (52%). The study found no-to-weak association between predefined factors and URE. While males had decreased odds [odds ratio (OR): 0.557, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.211–1.470] for myopia than astigmatism, the converse was true for hyperopia (OR: 1.165, 95% CI: 0.385–3.524) compared with astigmatism. Even though participants from families with lower affluence and living in rural settings had up to 18 times increased odds (OR: 18.699, 95% CI: 0.840–416.442) for myopia than astigmatism and hyperopia, significant dioptric power was less likely to be present in those with myopia (OR: 0.529, 95% CI: 0.165–1.698) and hyperopia (OR: 0.011, 95% CI: 0.001–0.192).

Conclusions: URE may not be significantly associated with school-going adolescents’ sociodemographic and socioeconomic
statuses. However, myopia and astigmatism are increasingly likely to be present among participants from families with lower affluence and living in rural settings.

Get Citation

Keywords

sociodemographic; socioeconomic; uncorrected refractive error; vision impairmentcted refractive error, vision impairment

About this article
Title

Factors associated with uncorrected refractive errors in school-going adolescents in Kakamega County, Kenya

Journal

Ophthalmology Journal

Issue

Vol 7 (2022): Continuous Publishing

Article type

Original paper

Pages

152-162

Published online

2022-09-05

Page views

4232

Article views/downloads

459

DOI

10.5603/OJ.2022.0021

Bibliographic record

Ophthalmol J 2022;7:152-162.

Keywords

sociodemographic
socioeconomic
uncorrected refractive error
vision impairmentcted refractive error
vision impairment

Authors

Emmanuel E. Okenwa-Vincent
Jyoti Naidoo
Peter Clarke-Farr

References (29)
  1. Naidoo KS, Jaggernath J. Uncorrected refractive errors. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012; 60(5): 432–437.
  2. Senjam SS, Vashist P, Gupta N, et al. Prevalence of visual impairment due to uncorrected refractive error: Results from Delhi-Rapid Assessment of Visual Impairment Study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016; 64(5): 387–390.
  3. Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012; 96(5): 614–618.
  4. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, et al. Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull World Health Organ. 2008; 86(1): 63–70.
  5. WHO. Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013–2020. from: www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html (2018 Mar 3).
  6. Fricke TR, Holden BA, Wilson DA, et al. Global cost of correcting vision impairment from uncorrected refractive error. Bull World Health Organ. 2012; 90(10): 728–738.
  7. Naidoo KS, Leasher J, Bourne RR, et al. Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Global Vision Impairment and Blindness Due to Uncorrected Refractive Error, 1990-2010. Optom Vis Sci. 2016; 93(3): 227–234.
  8. Dandona R, Dandona L. Socioeconomic status and blindness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85(12): 1484–1488.
  9. Marmamula S, Ravuri LV, Boon MY, et al. Spectacle coverage and spectacles use among elderly population in residential care in the south Indian state of Andhra Pradesh. Biomed Res Int. 2013; 2013: 183502.
  10. Naidoo KS, Leasher J, Bourne RR, et al. Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Global Vision Impairment and Blindness Due to Uncorrected Refractive Error, 1990-2010. Optom Vis Sci. 2016; 93(3): 227–234.
  11. Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Yekta A, et al. Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2018; 30(1): 3–22.
  12. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, et al. Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull World Health Organ. 2008; 86(1): 63–70.
  13. Qiu M, Wang SY, Singh K, et al. Racial disparities in uncorrected and undercorrected refractive error in the United States. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55(10): 6996–7005.
  14. Kodjebacheva G, Brown ER, Estrada L, et al. Uncorrected refractive error among first-grade students of different racial/ethnic groups in southern California: results a year after school-mandated vision screening. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011; 17(6): 499–505.
  15. O'Donoghue L, Kapetanankis VV, McClelland JF, et al. Risk Factors for Childhood Myopia: Findings From the NICER Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56(3): 1524–1530.
  16. Onakpoya OH, Adeoye AO, Akinsola FB, et al. Prevalence of blindness and visual impairment in Atakunmosa West Local Government area of southwestern Nigeria. Tanzan Health Res Bull. 2007; 9(2): 126–131.
  17. Naidoo KS, Raghunandan A, Mashige KP, et al. Refractive error and visual impairment in African children in South Africa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44(9): 3764–3770.
  18. Berhane Y, Worku A, Bejiga A, et al. Prevalence and causes of blindness and Low Vision in Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2008; 21(3).
  19. Njuguna M, Msukwa G, Shilio B, et al. Causes of severe visual impairment and blindness in children in schools for the blind in eastern Africa: changes in the last 14 years. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2009; 16(3): 151–155.
  20. Kimani K, Lindfield R, Senyonjo L, et al. Prevalence and causes of ocular morbidity in Mbeere District, Kenya. Results of a population-based survey. PLoS One. 2013; 8(8): e70009.
  21. Muma MK, Kimani K, Wanyoike MMK, Ilako DR, Njuguna MW. Prevalence of refractive errors in primary school children of a rural district of Kenya. JOECSA. http://coecsa.org/ojs-2.4.2/index.php/JOECSA/article/view/11 (cited 2018 Mar 14).
  22. Nyamai- University of Nairobi LA. Prevalence, Knowledge, Attitude and Practice on Refractive error among Students attending Public High Schools in Nairobi County. 2016. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11295/95106/Nyamai_Prevalence%2C Knowledge%2C Attitude and Practice on Refractive error among Students attending Public High Schools in Nairobi County.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (2018 Feb 14).
  23. Ndegwa LK, Okelo RO, Karimurio J, et al. Prevalence of visual impairment and blindness in a Nairobi urban population. East African Med J. 2006; 83(4).
  24. Sewunet SA, Aredo KK, Gedefew M. Uncorrected refractive error and associated factors among primary school children in Debre Markos District, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014; 14: 95.
  25. O'Donoghue L, Kapetanankis VV, McClelland JF, et al. Risk Factors for Childhood Myopia: Findings From the NICER Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56(3): 1524–1530.
  26. Li S, Wang G, Xu Y, et al. Utility values among myopic patients in mainland China. Optom Vis Sci. 2014; 91(7): 723–729.
  27. Tay SuA, Farzavandi S, Tan D. Interventions to Reduce Myopia Progression in Children. Strabismus. 2017; 25(1): 23–32.
  28. Chua S, Foster P. The Economic and Societal Impact of Myopia and High Myopia. Updates on Myopia. 2019: 53–63.
  29. Alrasheed S, Naidoo K, Clarke-Farr P. Prevalence of visual impairment and refractive error in school-aged children in South Darfur State of Sudan. African Vis Eye Health. 2016; 75(1).

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

Publisher: VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, 73 Świętokrzyska St., 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 310 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl