open access
Acute ocular chemical injury: a descriptive assessment and management review at St. John Eye Hospital, Jerusalem, Palestine
, 1, 1
Affiliations- St. John Eye Hospital, Jerusalem, Palestine
open access
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the study was to assess caregivers’ compliance with the management protocol for chemical injury at St. John Eye Hospital, Jerusalem.
Material and methods: Charts of all new chemical injury patients who presented to St. John Eye Hospital, Jerusalem, between January and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Data categories collected included: presentation, age, sex, injury, irrigation, lids, visual acuity, slit-lamp examination (SLE), management plan, and medications given. Data were stored and analysed using Excel.
Results: Patients’ presentation date and time, sex, and age were recorded in over 90% of cases. The mechanism of injury and type of offending chemical were recorded in 65% of cases. The irrigating solution was identified in 50% of cases. Corrected visual acuity was recorded in both eyes in almost 50% of cases. Limbal ischemia was documented in 45% of cases, and intraocular pressure (IOP) was recorded in 25%. The management plan and explanation of the condition to patients were documented in less than 50% of cases. Antibiotics and steroids (drops/ointment) were prescribed in 92.5% of cases.
Conclusions: The results of this study reveal that our documentation needs improvement for several parameters. Several recommendations were formulated:
- Emphasize to caregivers that irrigation must be done first.
- Corrected visual acuity should be attempted for both eyes in all cases, and reasons for not recording it should be documented.
- It is important to document and record limbus details, iris details, and IOP in all cases.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the study was to assess caregivers’ compliance with the management protocol for chemical injury at St. John Eye Hospital, Jerusalem.
Material and methods: Charts of all new chemical injury patients who presented to St. John Eye Hospital, Jerusalem, between January and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Data categories collected included: presentation, age, sex, injury, irrigation, lids, visual acuity, slit-lamp examination (SLE), management plan, and medications given. Data were stored and analysed using Excel.
Results: Patients’ presentation date and time, sex, and age were recorded in over 90% of cases. The mechanism of injury and type of offending chemical were recorded in 65% of cases. The irrigating solution was identified in 50% of cases. Corrected visual acuity was recorded in both eyes in almost 50% of cases. Limbal ischemia was documented in 45% of cases, and intraocular pressure (IOP) was recorded in 25%. The management plan and explanation of the condition to patients were documented in less than 50% of cases. Antibiotics and steroids (drops/ointment) were prescribed in 92.5% of cases.
Conclusions: The results of this study reveal that our documentation needs improvement for several parameters. Several recommendations were formulated:
- Emphasize to caregivers that irrigation must be done first.
- Corrected visual acuity should be attempted for both eyes in all cases, and reasons for not recording it should be documented.
- It is important to document and record limbus details, iris details, and IOP in all cases.
Keywords
chemical injury; protocol; assessment; management; Palestine
About this articleTitle
Acute ocular chemical injury: a descriptive assessment and management review at St. John Eye Hospital, Jerusalem, Palestine
Journal
Issue
Vol 6 (2021): Continuous Publishing
Article type
Original paper
Pages
171-177
Published online
2021-10-27
Page views
6157
Article views/downloads
369
DOI
Bibliographic record
Ophthalmol J 2021;6:171-177.
Keywords
chemical injury
protocol
assessment
management
Palestine
Authors
Riyad Banayot
Yahya Swaiti
Islam Al-hashash
References (10)- Hughes WF. Alkali burns of the eye; clinical and pathologic course. Arch Ophthal. 1946; 36: 189–214.
- Lubeck D, Greene JS. Corneal injuries. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1988; 6(1): 73–94.
- Cohen KL, Hyndiuk RA. Ocular emergencies. Am Fam Physician. 1978; 18(4): 178–184.
- Rodeheaver GT, Hiebert JM, Edlich RF. Initial treatment of chemical skin and eye burns. Compr Ther. 1982; 8(5): 37–43.
- Roper-Hall MJ. Thermal and chemical burns. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1965; 85: 631–653.
- Lin M, Ekşioğlu Ü, Mudumbai R, et al. Glaucoma in Patients With Ocular Chemical Burns. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012; 154(3): 481–485.e1.
- Wagoner MD. Chemical injuries of the eye: current concepts in pathophysiology and therapy. Surv Ophthalmol. 1997; 41(4): 275–313.
- McCulley JP. Chemical injuries. In: Smolin G, Thoft RA. ed. The Cornea: Scientific Foundation and Clinical Practice. Little Brown and Co, Boston 1987: 527–42.
- American Academy of Ophthalmology 2019, Chemical (Alkali and Acid) Injury of the Conjunctiva and Cornea. https://eyewiki.aao.org/Chemical_(Alkali_and_Acid)_Injury_of_the_Conjunctiva_and_Cornea (June 17, 2021).
- The Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2019. Chemical injuries of the ocular. https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/College-News-April-2018-Focus.pdf (June 17, 2021).