open access
Visual outcomes and subjective satisfaction quotient of a multifocal intraocular lens in Indian population
, 2, 2
Affiliations- Guru Nanak Eye Centre, MAMC, New Delhi, India
- PGIMSR and ESI Hospital, Basaidarapaur, New Delhi, India
open access
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the study was to compare the visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, subjective visual satisfaction, and spectacle independence in patients implanted with apodized diffractive multifocal versus monofocal
intraocular lens following phacoemulsification. This was a 15-months prospective, interventional study.
Material and methods: In each of the 60 patients enrolled in the study, one eye was operated. In 30 patients, we implanted monofocal intraocular lens (IOLs) (Group I) and in 30 consecutive patients — multifocal IOLs (Group II). Follow-up visits at postoperative 1st, 4th, and 6th week were done. Distance and near visual acuity, contrast sensitivity at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cpd, refractive pseudophakic correction, and visual satisfaction by VF-14 questionnaire were assessed.
Results: Uncorrected and best-corrected distance visual acuity were comparable between the two groups (p > 0.05). 100% of patients in group I and 96.66% in Group II attained best-corrected vision of > 6/9. Uncorrected near visual acuity was significantly better in Group II (p < 0.0001). Sixteen out of 30 patients in Group II achieved unaided N6 vision. Corrected near vision was similar in the two groups. Mean near correction was much lower (+0.76 DS ± 0.86) in Group II. Photopic contrast sensitivity was better in Group I at lower frequencies (3 and 6 cpd). More satisfaction and spectacle independence was seen in Group II.
Conclusion: The apodised diffractive multifocal IOLs are a reasonable choice for patients who opt for freedom from glasses and understand its inherent limitation of reducing contrast to some degree.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the study was to compare the visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, subjective visual satisfaction, and spectacle independence in patients implanted with apodized diffractive multifocal versus monofocal
intraocular lens following phacoemulsification. This was a 15-months prospective, interventional study.
Material and methods: In each of the 60 patients enrolled in the study, one eye was operated. In 30 patients, we implanted monofocal intraocular lens (IOLs) (Group I) and in 30 consecutive patients — multifocal IOLs (Group II). Follow-up visits at postoperative 1st, 4th, and 6th week were done. Distance and near visual acuity, contrast sensitivity at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cpd, refractive pseudophakic correction, and visual satisfaction by VF-14 questionnaire were assessed.
Results: Uncorrected and best-corrected distance visual acuity were comparable between the two groups (p > 0.05). 100% of patients in group I and 96.66% in Group II attained best-corrected vision of > 6/9. Uncorrected near visual acuity was significantly better in Group II (p < 0.0001). Sixteen out of 30 patients in Group II achieved unaided N6 vision. Corrected near vision was similar in the two groups. Mean near correction was much lower (+0.76 DS ± 0.86) in Group II. Photopic contrast sensitivity was better in Group I at lower frequencies (3 and 6 cpd). More satisfaction and spectacle independence was seen in Group II.
Conclusion: The apodised diffractive multifocal IOLs are a reasonable choice for patients who opt for freedom from glasses and understand its inherent limitation of reducing contrast to some degree.
Keywords
multifocal; apodised diffractive; Indian patients; contrast sensitivity
About this articleTitle
Visual outcomes and subjective satisfaction quotient of a multifocal intraocular lens in Indian population
Journal
Issue
Vol 6 (2021): Continuous Publishing
Article type
Original paper
Pages
143-150
Published online
2021-10-13
Page views
5879
Article views/downloads
357
DOI
Bibliographic record
Ophthalmol J 2021;6:143-150.
Keywords
multifocal
apodised diffractive
Indian patients
contrast sensitivity
Authors
Jigyasa Sahu
Sandeep Kumar
Anil D. Mehta
References (15)- Bleckmann H, Schmidt O, Sunde T, et al. Visual results of progressive multifocal posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996; 22(8): 1102–1107.
- Vingolo EM, Grenga P, Iacobelli L, et al. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity: AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive versus AcrySof SA60AT monofocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33(7): 1244–1247.
- Negishi K, Nagamoto T, Hara E, et al. Clinical evaluation of a five-zone refractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996; 22(1): 110–115.
- Gimbel HV, Sanders DR, Raanan MG. Visual and refractive results of multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98(6): 881–7; discussion 888.
- Weghaupt H, Pieh S, Skorpik C. Comparison of pseudoaccommodation and visual quality between a diffractive and refractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24(5): 663–665.
- Vaquero-Ruano M, Encinas J, Millan I, et al. AMO Array multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses: Long-term follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24(1): 118–123.
- Jacobi PC, Dietlein TS, Konen W. Multifocal intraocular lens implantation in pediatric cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108(8): 1375–1380.
- Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Blázquez JI, et al. Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29(4): 703–711.
- Steinert RF, Post CT, Brint SF, et al. A prospective, randomized, double-masked comparison of a zonal-progressive multifocal intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 1992; 99(6): 853–60; discussion 860.
- Bleckmann H, Schmidt O, Sunde T, et al. Visual results of progressive multifocal posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996; 22(8): 1102–1107.
- Dadeya S, Kaushik S. Contrast sensitivity and depth of focus with aspheric multifocal versus conventional monofocal intraocular lens. Can J Ophthalmol. 2001; 36(4): 197–201.
- Calladine D, Evans JR, Shah S, et al. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012(9): CD003169.
- Wilkins MR. Randomized Trial of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses versus Monovision after Bilateral Cataract Surgery. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(12): 2449–2455.
- Chiam PJT, Chan JH, Aggarwal RK, et al. ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: quality of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32(9): 1459–1463.
- Schmitz S, Dick HB, Krummenauer F, et al. Contrast sensitivity and glare disability by halogen light after monofocal and multifocal lens implantation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000; 84(10): 1109–1112.