open access

Vol 6 (2021): Continuous Publishing
Original paper
Published online: 2021-07-15
Get Citation

Assessment of wound integrity in manual small incision cataract surgery in a tertiary hospital in South India

Ramya M1, Soumya Ramani1
·
Ophthalmol J 2021;6:65-68.
Affiliations
  1. M.S. Ramaiah Medical College, Nagar, Bangalore, India

open access

Vol 6 (2021): Continuous Publishing
ORIGINAL PAPERS
Published online: 2021-07-15

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to assess the wound integrity in small incision cataract surgery (SICS) by modified Siedel’s test.

Material and methods: Forty eyes of 40 patients who underwent small incision cataract surgery from a rural background in South India were enrolled in the study after obtaining consent along with the surgical consent from January to March 2020. A complete history was taken, ocular examination and keratometry were performed. B-scan was conducted for patients with mature cataracts. Fundus examination was performed with slit-lamp biomicroscopy and 90 D lens. On the first post-operative day, the best-corrected visual acuity was recorded using the Snellen chart. Anterior segment examination was conducted. Wound integrity was assessed using modified Siedel’s test.

Results: In our study, males constituted 55% of the study population, and females — 45%. The age or sex of the patient did not have a bearing on the need for suture in the patients who underwent small incision cataract surgery (p = 0.283). The cataract grade also did not affect the need for a suture in the study population (p = 0.280). All the patients in our study did not have a positive Seidel’s test, notwithstanding the age or sex of the patient, grade of cataract, site of incision, the presence or absence of suture, or the site of the incision, that is superior or superotemporal.

Conclusion: Manual small incision cataract surgery can be considered a relatively safe and effective procedure for wound integrity and vision improvement.

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to assess the wound integrity in small incision cataract surgery (SICS) by modified Siedel’s test.

Material and methods: Forty eyes of 40 patients who underwent small incision cataract surgery from a rural background in South India were enrolled in the study after obtaining consent along with the surgical consent from January to March 2020. A complete history was taken, ocular examination and keratometry were performed. B-scan was conducted for patients with mature cataracts. Fundus examination was performed with slit-lamp biomicroscopy and 90 D lens. On the first post-operative day, the best-corrected visual acuity was recorded using the Snellen chart. Anterior segment examination was conducted. Wound integrity was assessed using modified Siedel’s test.

Results: In our study, males constituted 55% of the study population, and females — 45%. The age or sex of the patient did not have a bearing on the need for suture in the patients who underwent small incision cataract surgery (p = 0.283). The cataract grade also did not affect the need for a suture in the study population (p = 0.280). All the patients in our study did not have a positive Seidel’s test, notwithstanding the age or sex of the patient, grade of cataract, site of incision, the presence or absence of suture, or the site of the incision, that is superior or superotemporal.

Conclusion: Manual small incision cataract surgery can be considered a relatively safe and effective procedure for wound integrity and vision improvement.

Get Citation

Keywords

small incision cataract surgery (SICS); cataract, modified Siedel’s test

About this article
Title

Assessment of wound integrity in manual small incision cataract surgery in a tertiary hospital in South India

Journal

Ophthalmology Journal

Issue

Vol 6 (2021): Continuous Publishing

Article type

Original paper

Pages

65-68

Published online

2021-07-15

Page views

6210

Article views/downloads

706

DOI

10.5603/OJ.2021.0011

Bibliographic record

Ophthalmol J 2021;6:65-68.

Keywords

small incision cataract surgery (SICS)
cataract
modified Siedel’s test

Authors

Ramya M
Soumya Ramani

References (14)
  1. Bernhisel A, Pettey J. Manual small incision cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020; 31(1): 74–79.
  2. Liu YC, Wilkins M, Kim T, et al. Cataracts. Lancet. 2017; 390(10094): 600–612.
  3. Singh S, Pardhan S, Kulothungan V, et al. The prevalence and risk factors for cataract in rural and urban India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019; 67(4): 477–483.
  4. Ammous I, Bouayed E, Mabrouk S, et al. [Phacoemulsification versus manual small incision cataract surgery: Anatomic and functional results]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2017; 40(6): 460–466.
  5. Tong AY, Gupta PK, Kim T. Wound closure and tissue adhesives in clear corneal incision cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018; 29(1): 14–18.
  6. Matossian C, Makari S, Potvin R. Cataract surgery and methods of wound closure: a review. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015; 9: 921–928.
  7. Gogate P, Optom JJ, Deshpande S, et al. Meta-analysis to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery and Phacoemulsification. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015; 22(3): 362–369.
  8. Kashiwabuchi F, Khan Y, Jr MR, et al. Efficacy of three different methods for side port incision wound sealing. Rev Bras Oftalmol. 2013; 72(6): 379–382.
  9. Mallik VK, Kumar S, Kamboj R, et al. Comparison of astigmatism following manual small incision cataract surgery: superior versus temporal approach. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2012; 4(1): 54–58.
  10. Darcy K, Elhaddad O, Achiron A. Reducing visible aerosol generation during phacoemulsification in the era of Covid-19. Eye (Lond). 2021; 35(5): 1405–1410.
  11. Haripriya A, Chang DF, Reena M, et al. Complication rates of phacoemulsification and manual small-incision cataract surgery at Aravind Eye Hospital. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38(8): 1360–1369.
  12. Singh K, Misbah A, Saluja P, et al. Review of manual small-incision cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017; 65(12): 1281–1288.
  13. Ang M, Evans JR, Mehta JS. Manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) with posterior chamber intraocular lens versus extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with posterior chamber intraocular lens for age-related cataract. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(11): CD008811.
  14. Riaz Y, de Silva SR, Evans JR. Manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) with posterior chamber intraocular lens versus phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens for age-related cataract. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013(10): CD008813.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

Publisher: VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, 73 Świętokrzyska St., 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 310 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl