open access
Uptake of conventional interventions, level of awareness and perception on computer vision syndrome: a cross-sectional study among University students, Kenya
, 2, 3
Affiliations- Department of Public Health, Maseno University, Kisumu, Kenya
- Department of Public Health, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University, Bondo, Kenya
- School of Graduate Studies, Maseno University, Kisumu, Kenya
open access
Abstract
Background: Awareness and perception are critical determinants in the uptake of a health intervention. This study
assessed the level of awareness and perception in relation to the uptake of interventions of computer vision syndrome (CVS) among university students.
Material and methods: From a target population of 21,000 students, 384 students were included in the study. Participants were recruited from Maseno, Kenya. Structured in-depth questionnaires were administered to the participants. Composite awareness scale and summative perception score were used to quantify the level of awareness
and perception.
Results: Out of the 384 participants, 48.7% were males, and 51.3% females. The study denoted a modal age of 18–24 years with a mean age of 19.5 years (SD = 0.747). The prevalence of CVS was 60.4% (n = 232), and almost half of the participants (47.8%) had a low level of awareness. There was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001) in the level of awareness among participants. Based on perception, nearly three quarter of the participants (60%) perceived CVS as a global issue of public health concern in relation to the introduction of portable electronic devices used on a daily basis. Based on CVS precautions, almost half of the participants (40%) did not practice the preventive measures.
Conclusion: Computer vision syndrome was present in about two out of every five students, while awareness remained significantly low, as well as uptake of preventive measures. We emphasize the need for interventions to increase CVS awareness. Developing an item bank for measuring CVS is desirable.
Abstract
Background: Awareness and perception are critical determinants in the uptake of a health intervention. This study
assessed the level of awareness and perception in relation to the uptake of interventions of computer vision syndrome (CVS) among university students.
Material and methods: From a target population of 21,000 students, 384 students were included in the study. Participants were recruited from Maseno, Kenya. Structured in-depth questionnaires were administered to the participants. Composite awareness scale and summative perception score were used to quantify the level of awareness
and perception.
Results: Out of the 384 participants, 48.7% were males, and 51.3% females. The study denoted a modal age of 18–24 years with a mean age of 19.5 years (SD = 0.747). The prevalence of CVS was 60.4% (n = 232), and almost half of the participants (47.8%) had a low level of awareness. There was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001) in the level of awareness among participants. Based on perception, nearly three quarter of the participants (60%) perceived CVS as a global issue of public health concern in relation to the introduction of portable electronic devices used on a daily basis. Based on CVS precautions, almost half of the participants (40%) did not practice the preventive measures.
Conclusion: Computer vision syndrome was present in about two out of every five students, while awareness remained significantly low, as well as uptake of preventive measures. We emphasize the need for interventions to increase CVS awareness. Developing an item bank for measuring CVS is desirable.
Keywords
level of awareness; perceived susceptibility; practice of interventions
About this articleTitle
Uptake of conventional interventions, level of awareness and perception on computer vision syndrome: a cross-sectional study among University students, Kenya
Journal
Issue
Vol 6 (2021): Continuous Publishing
Article type
Original paper
Pages
1-9
Published online
2021-01-25
Page views
6633
Article views/downloads
847
DOI
Bibliographic record
Ophthalmol J 2021;6:1-9.
Keywords
level of awareness
perceived susceptibility
practice of interventions
Authors
Shadrack Muma
Dickens Omondi Aduda
Patrick Ogola Onyango
References (24)- Khan R, Surti A, Rehman R, et al. Knowledge and Practices of Ergonomics in Computer users. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012; 62(3): 213–217.
- Schaumberg DA, Dana R, Buring JE, et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease among US men: estimates from the Physicians' Health Studies. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009; 127(6): 763–768.
- Mallik D, Gahlot A, Maini A, et al. Prevalence of dry eye amongst computer workers in Kanpur. Int J Commun Med Publ Health. 2017; 4(7): 2308.
- Logaraj M, Madhupriya V, Hegde S. Computer Vision Syndrome and Associated Factors among Medical and Engineering Students in Chennai. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014; 4(2): 179.
- Gupta N, Moudgil T, Sharma B. Computer Vision Syndrome: Prevalence And Predictors Among College Staff And Students. J Dent Med Sci. 2016; 15(9): 28–31.
- Han CC, Liu R, Liu RR. Prevalence of Asthenopia and its Risk Factors in Chinese College Students. Int J Ophthalmol. 2013; 6(5): 718–722.
- Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Yekta A, et al. Global and Regional Estimates of Prevalence of Refractive Errors : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2018; 30(1): 3–22.
- Mowatt L, Gordon C, Santosh AB, et al. Computer vision syndrome and ergonomic practices among undergraduate university students. Int J Clin Pract. 2018; 72(1).
- Khalaj M, Ebrahimi M, Shojai P, et al. Computer Vision Syndrome in Eleven to Eighteen-Year-Old Students in Qazvin. Biotechnol Health Sci. 2015; 2(3).
- Sen A, Richardson SA. A Study of Computer-Related Upper Limb Discomfort and Computer Vision Syndrome. J Human Ergol. 2007; 36(2): 45–50.
- Charpe NA, Kaushik V. Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS): Recognition and Control In Software Professionals. J Human Ecol. 2009; 28: 67–69.
- Shantakumari N, Eldeeb R, Sreedharan J, et al. Computer use and vision-related problems among university students in ajman, United arab emirate. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014; 4(2): 258–263.
- Shrivastava S, Bobhate P. Computer related health problems among software professionals in Mumbai: A cross-sectional study. Int J Health Allied Sci. 2012; 1(2): 74.
- Amirul FZ, Aquilah R, Lee ML, et al. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Computer Vision Syndrome among Staffs that use Video Display Terminal in a Faculty of a Malaysian Public University. Intl J Public Health Clin Sci. 2015; 2(1): 2289–7577.
- Dios JRMd, Arrue BC, Ollero A, et al. Computer vision techniques for forest fire perception. Image Vis Comp. 2008; 26(4): 550–562.
- Singh H, Tigga M, Laad S, et al. Prevention of Ocular Morbidity among Medical Students by Prevalence Assessment of Asthenopia and its Risk Factors. J Evid Based Med Health. 2016; 3(15): 532–536.
- Zucker S. Computer Vision and Human Perception. J Chem Inf Model. 2013; 53: 1689–1699.
- Ko P, Mohapatra A, Bailey IL. Effect of Font Size and Glare on Computer Tasks in Young and Older Adults. Optom Vis Sci. 2014; 91(6): 682–689.
- Rosenfield M. Computer vision syndrome: a review of ocular causes and potential treatments. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011; 31(5): 502–515.
- Reddy SC, Low CK, Lim YP, et al. Computer vision syndrome: a study of knowledge and practices in university students. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2013; 5(2): 161–168.
- Nursyifa G, Santoso P. Computer Vision Syndrome among Call Center Employees at Telecommunication Company in Bandung. Althea Med J. 2016; 3(2): 181–185.
- Noreen K, Batool Z, Fatima T, et al. Prevalence of Computer Vision Syndrome andiIts Associated Risk Factors among Under Graduate Medical Students. Pak J Ophthalmol. 2016; 140.
- Chendilnathan C, Ramalingam P, Raja A, et al. Cross-sectional questionnaire study of ocular effects among IT professionals who use computers. Int J Med Publ Health. 2015; 5(1): 63.
- Bali J, Navin N, Thakur BR. Computer vision syndrome: a study of the knowledge, attitudes and practices in Indian ophthalmologists. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007; 55(4): 289–294.