open access

Vol 57, No 3 (2023)
Research Paper
Submitted: 2022-11-27
Accepted: 2023-03-13
Published online: 2023-04-20
Get Citation

Children with corpus callosum anomalies: clinical characteristics and developmental outcomes

Iwona Jańczewska1, Joanna Preis-Orlikowska1, Iwona Domżalska-Popadiuk1, Krzysztof Preis2, Alicja Jańczewska3
·
Pubmed: 37078131
·
Neurol Neurochir Pol 2023;57(3):269-281.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
  2. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
  3. Intern doctor at University Clinical Centre in Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland

open access

Vol 57, No 3 (2023)
Research papers
Submitted: 2022-11-27
Accepted: 2023-03-13
Published online: 2023-04-20

Abstract

Introduction. Corpus callosum abnormalities are complex, aetiologically diverse, and clinically heterogeneous conditions. Counselling parents regarding their causes and associated syndromes, and predicting the neurodevelopmental and seizure risk prognosis, is challenging. Material and methods. We describe the clinical characteristics, associated anomalies, and neurodevelopmental outcomes of children with agenesis of corpus callosum (ACC). Fifty-one neonates with ACC/hypoplasia of the corpus callosum were identified over a 17-year period, and their medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Results. Patients were classified into two groups depending on the presence or absence of associated abnormalities. The first group (17 patients, 33.4%) presented with isolated callosal anomalies. The second group included 34 patients (66.6%) with associated cerebral and extracerebral anomalies. We achieved an identifiable genetic aetiology in 23.5% of our cohort. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 28 patients (55%), and of these 39.3% had additional brain anomalies. During the study period, five patients died early in the neonatal period and four were lost to follow up. Of the 42 followed patients, 13 (31%) showed normal neurodevelopment, 13 (31%) showed mild delay, and 16 (38%) had a severe delay. Fifteen (35.7%) had epilepsy. Conclusions and clinical implications. We have confirmed that callosal defects are frequently accompanied by brain and somatic anomalies. Additional abnormalities were shown to be significantly associated with developmental delay and increased risk of epilepsy. We have highlighted essential clinical features that may provide diagnostic clues to physicians and we have given examples of underlying genetic disorders. We have provided recommendations about extended neuroimaging diagnostics and widespread genetic testing that may impact upon daily clinical practice. Paediatric neurologists may therefore use our findings to help base their decisions regarding this matter.

Abstract

Introduction. Corpus callosum abnormalities are complex, aetiologically diverse, and clinically heterogeneous conditions. Counselling parents regarding their causes and associated syndromes, and predicting the neurodevelopmental and seizure risk prognosis, is challenging. Material and methods. We describe the clinical characteristics, associated anomalies, and neurodevelopmental outcomes of children with agenesis of corpus callosum (ACC). Fifty-one neonates with ACC/hypoplasia of the corpus callosum were identified over a 17-year period, and their medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Results. Patients were classified into two groups depending on the presence or absence of associated abnormalities. The first group (17 patients, 33.4%) presented with isolated callosal anomalies. The second group included 34 patients (66.6%) with associated cerebral and extracerebral anomalies. We achieved an identifiable genetic aetiology in 23.5% of our cohort. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 28 patients (55%), and of these 39.3% had additional brain anomalies. During the study period, five patients died early in the neonatal period and four were lost to follow up. Of the 42 followed patients, 13 (31%) showed normal neurodevelopment, 13 (31%) showed mild delay, and 16 (38%) had a severe delay. Fifteen (35.7%) had epilepsy. Conclusions and clinical implications. We have confirmed that callosal defects are frequently accompanied by brain and somatic anomalies. Additional abnormalities were shown to be significantly associated with developmental delay and increased risk of epilepsy. We have highlighted essential clinical features that may provide diagnostic clues to physicians and we have given examples of underlying genetic disorders. We have provided recommendations about extended neuroimaging diagnostics and widespread genetic testing that may impact upon daily clinical practice. Paediatric neurologists may therefore use our findings to help base their decisions regarding this matter.

Get Citation

Keywords

agenesis of corpus callosum, developmental delay, somatic anomalies, brain malformation, genetic anomalies

About this article
Title

Children with corpus callosum anomalies: clinical characteristics and developmental outcomes

Journal

Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska

Issue

Vol 57, No 3 (2023)

Article type

Research Paper

Pages

269-281

Published online

2023-04-20

Page views

1578

Article views/downloads

907

DOI

10.5603/PJNNS.a2023.0026

Pubmed

37078131

Bibliographic record

Neurol Neurochir Pol 2023;57(3):269-281.

Keywords

agenesis of corpus callosum
developmental delay
somatic anomalies
brain malformation
genetic anomalies

Authors

Iwona Jańczewska
Joanna Preis-Orlikowska
Iwona Domżalska-Popadiuk
Krzysztof Preis
Alicja Jańczewska

References (43)
  1. Paul LK, Brown WS, Adolphs R, et al. Agenesis of the corpus callosum: genetic, developmental and functional aspects of connectivity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007; 8(4): 287–299.
  2. Raybaud C. The corpus callosum, the other great forebrain commissures, and the septum pellucidum: anatomy, development, and malformation. Neuroradiology. 2010; 52(6): 447–477.
  3. Edwards TJ, Sherr EH, Barkovich AJ, et al. Clinical, genetic and imaging findings identify new causes for corpus callosum development syndromes. Brain. 2014; 137(Pt 6): 1579–1613.
  4. Stoll C, Dott B, Roth MP. Associated anomalies in cases with agenesis of the corpus callosum. Am J Med Genet A. 2019; 179(10): 2101–2111.
  5. Bedeschi MF, Bonaglia MC, Grasso R, et al. Agenesis of the corpus callosum: clinical and genetic study in 63 young patients. Pediatr Neurol. 2006; 34(3): 186–193.
  6. Jeret JS, Serur D, Wisniewski KE, et al. Clinicopathological findings associated with agenesis of the corpus callosum. Brain Dev. 1987; 9(3): 255–264.
  7. Hetts SW, Sherr EH, Chao S, et al. Anomalies of the corpus callosum: an MR analysis of the phenotypic spectrum of associated malformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187(5): 1343–1348.
  8. Schell-Apacik CC, Wagner K, Bihler M, et al. Agenesis and dysgenesis of the corpus callosum: clinical, genetic and neuroimaging findings in a series of 41 patients. Am J Med Genet A. 2008; 146A(19): 2501–2511.
  9. Hofman J, Hutny M, Sztuba K, et al. Corpus Callosum Agenesis: An Insight into the Etiology and Spectrum of Symptoms. Brain Sci. 2020; 10(9).
  10. Palmer EE, Mowat D. Agenesis of the corpus callosum: a clinical approach to diagnosis. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014; 166C(2): 184–197.
  11. Ballardini E, Marino P, Maietti E, et al. Prevalence and associated factors for agenesis of corpus callosum in Emilia Romagna (1981-2015). Eur J Med Genet. 2018; 61(9): 524–530.
  12. Szabó N, Gergev G, Kóbor J, et al. Corpus callosum anomalies: birth prevalence and clinical spectrum in Hungary. Pediatr Neurol. 2011; 44(6): 420–426.
  13. Glass HC, Shaw GM, Ma C, et al. Agenesis of the corpus callosum in California 1983-2003: a population-based study. Am J Med Genet A. 2008; 146A(19): 2495–2500.
  14. Ghi T, Carletti A, Contro E, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of partial agenesis and hypoplasia of the corpus callosum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 35(1): 35–41.
  15. Janiak K, Respondek-Liberska M, Liberski PP, et al. Agenesis of corpus callosum – significance of prenatal diagnosis. Current Neurology. 2009; 9: 194–202.
  16. Santo S, D'Antonio F, Homfray T, et al. Counseling in fetal medicine: agenesis of the corpus callosum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 40(5): 513–521.
  17. Volpe P, Votino C, Fanelli T, et al. Corpus Callosum and Septum Pellucidum Anomalies. Obstetric Imaging: Fetal Diagnosis and Care. 2018: 162–172.e1.
  18. Rüland AM, Berg C, Gembruch U, et al. Prenatal Diagnosis of Anomalies of the Corpus Callosum over a 13-Year Period. Ultraschall Med. 2016; 37(6): 598–603.
  19. Francesco P, Maria-Edgarda B, Giovanni P, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of agenesis of corpus callosum: what is the neurodevelopmental outcome? Pediatr Int. 2006; 48(3): 298–304.
  20. Ballardini E, Tarocco A, Rosignoli C, et al. Universal Head Ultrasound Screening in Full-term Neonates: A Retrospective Analysis of 6771 Infants. Pediatr Neurol. 2017; 71: 14–17.
  21. Al-Hashim AH, Blaser S, Raybaud C, et al. Corpus callosum abnormalities: neuroradiological and clinical correlations. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016; 58(5): 475–484.
  22. Sztriha L. Spectrum of corpus callosum agenesis. Pediatr Neurol. 2005; 32(2): 94–101.
  23. Margari L, Palumbi R, Campa MG, et al. Clinical manifestations in children and adolescents with corpus callosum abnormalities. J Neurol. 2016; 263(10): 1939–1945.
  24. Folliot-Le Doussal L, Chadie A, Brasseur-Daudruy M, et al. Perinatal Network of Haute-Normandie. Neurodevelopmental outcome in prenatally diagnosed isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum. Early Hum Dev. 2018; 116: 9–16.
  25. Yeh HR, Park HK, Kim HJ, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with prenatally diagnosed corpus callosal abnormalities. Brain Dev. 2018; 40(8): 634–641.
  26. Abe K, Harada N, Itoh T, et al. Trisomy 13/trisomy 18 mosaicism in an infant. Clin Genet. 1996; 50(5): 300–303.
  27. Rüland AM, Gloning KP, Albig M, et al. The Incidence of Chromosomal Aberrations in Prenatally Diagnosed Isolated Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum. Ultraschall Med. 2017; 38(6): 626–632.
  28. Serur D, Jeret JS, Wisniewski K. Agenesis of the corpus callosum: clinical, neuroradiological and cytogenetic studies. Neuropediatrics. 1988; 19(2): 87–91.
  29. Chen CP, Hsu CY, Chern SR, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 8 by amniocentesis in a fetus with ventriculomegaly and dysgenesis of the corpus callosum. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 59(1): 127–129.
  30. Kraynack NC, Hostoffer RW, Robin NH. Agenesis of the corpus callosum associated with DiGeorge-velocardiofacial syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. J Child Neurol. 1999; 14(11): 754–756.
  31. Vialard F, Robyr R, Hillion Y, et al. Dandy-Walker syndrome and corpus callosum agenesis in 5p deletion. Prenat Diagn. 2005; 25(4): 311–313.
  32. Slavotinek A, Li C, Sherr EH, et al. Mutation analysis of the FRAS1 gene demonstrates new mutations in a propositus with Fraser syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2006; 140(18): 1909–1914.
  33. Byrne S, Dionisi-Vici C, Smith L, et al. Vici syndrome: a review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016; 11: 21.
  34. Figura M, Geremek M, Milanowski ŁM, et al. Movement disorders associated with chromosomal aberrations diagnosed in adult patients. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2021; 55(3): 300–305.
  35. Akçakaya NH, Özeş Ak B, Gonzalez MA, et al. Clinical and genetic aspects of hereditary spastic paraplegia in patients from Turkey. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2020; 54(2): 176–184.
  36. Oosterhof N, Chang IJ, Karimiani EG, et al. Homozygous Mutations in CSF1R Cause a Pediatric-Onset Leukoencephalopathy and Can Result in Congenital Absence of Microglia. Am J Hum Genet. 2019; 104(5): 936–947.
  37. Daghagh H, Kafshboran HR, Daneshmandpour Y, et al. Homozygous mutation in CSF1R causes brain abnormalities, neurodegeneration, and dysosteosclerosis (BANDDOS). BioImpacts. ; 2022: 12.
  38. Żur-Wyrozumska K, Kaczmarska P, Mensah-Glanowska P. Adult-onset leukoencephalopathy with axonal spheroids and pigmented glia associated with an A792D mutation in the CSF1R gene in a Polish patient. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2021; 55(3): 322–324.
  39. Wszolek ZK. First Polish case of CSF1R-related leukoencephalopathy. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2021; 55(3): 239–240.
  40. des Portes V, Rolland A, Velazquez-Dominguez J, et al. Outcome of isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum: A population-based prospective study. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2018; 22(1): 82–92.
  41. Sotiriadis A, Makrydimas G, Sotiriadis A, et al. Neurodevelopment after prenatal diagnosis of isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum: an integrative review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206(4): 337.e1–337.e5.
  42. Kim YU, Park ES, Jung S, et al. Clinical features and associated abnormalities in children and adolescents with corpus callosal anomalies. Ann Rehabil Med. 2014; 38(1): 138–143.
  43. Byrne S, Dionisi-Vici C, Smith L, et al. Vici syndrome: a review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016; 11: 21.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl