open access

Vol 56, No 3 (2022)
Invited Review Article
Submitted: 2022-06-09
Accepted: 2022-06-15
Published online: 2022-06-23
Get Citation

Immunosenescence and multiple sclerosis

Monika Adamczyk-Sowa1, Maria Nowak-Kiczmer1, Jerzy Jaroszewicz2, Thomas Berger3
·
Pubmed: 35735245
·
Neurol Neurochir Pol 2022;56(3):220-227.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Zabrze, Poland
  2. Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
  3. Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria

open access

Vol 56, No 3 (2022)
INVITED REVIEW ARTICLES — LEADING TOPIC
Submitted: 2022-06-09
Accepted: 2022-06-15
Published online: 2022-06-23

Abstract

Changes in the immune system associated with ageing are known as immunosenescence. This is characterised by a decline in immune response, chronic inflammation and an increased risk of autoimmune diseases. A chronic inflammatory process with persistent production of proinflammatory mediators increases the risk for morbidity and mortality related to age, and has been dubbed ‘inflamm-ageing’.
Immunosenescence is associated with a decrease in the number of naive T and B cells, NK cells and disruption of the pro- and anti-inflammatory balance by changes in the production of cytokines. In fact, ageing of the immune system has a complex network of underlying causes which include not only natural mechanisms of senescence but also chronic disorders, lifestyle, environmental and epigenetic factors, and infections. Moreover, immunosenescence has an influence on the course of chronic diseases which have an onset in young adults, such as multiple sclerosis (MS).
Current disease modifying therapies (DMTs) in MS aim to reduce the frequency of relapses and to slow disease progression, but they do not necessarily stop the accumulation of disability related to disease progression. Some features of immunosenescence found in aged healthy controls are already observed in MS patients at a younger age.
The older population is characterised by an increased susceptibility to infections, a poor response to vaccinations, and a higher risk of developing cancer, vascular diseases and neurodegeneration. Immunosenescence is an important factor influencing the course of MS, and the safety and effectiveness of DMTs. The relationship between the pathogenic process underlying the development of MS and immunosenescence requires further investigation.

Abstract

Changes in the immune system associated with ageing are known as immunosenescence. This is characterised by a decline in immune response, chronic inflammation and an increased risk of autoimmune diseases. A chronic inflammatory process with persistent production of proinflammatory mediators increases the risk for morbidity and mortality related to age, and has been dubbed ‘inflamm-ageing’.
Immunosenescence is associated with a decrease in the number of naive T and B cells, NK cells and disruption of the pro- and anti-inflammatory balance by changes in the production of cytokines. In fact, ageing of the immune system has a complex network of underlying causes which include not only natural mechanisms of senescence but also chronic disorders, lifestyle, environmental and epigenetic factors, and infections. Moreover, immunosenescence has an influence on the course of chronic diseases which have an onset in young adults, such as multiple sclerosis (MS).
Current disease modifying therapies (DMTs) in MS aim to reduce the frequency of relapses and to slow disease progression, but they do not necessarily stop the accumulation of disability related to disease progression. Some features of immunosenescence found in aged healthy controls are already observed in MS patients at a younger age.
The older population is characterised by an increased susceptibility to infections, a poor response to vaccinations, and a higher risk of developing cancer, vascular diseases and neurodegeneration. Immunosenescence is an important factor influencing the course of MS, and the safety and effectiveness of DMTs. The relationship between the pathogenic process underlying the development of MS and immunosenescence requires further investigation.

Get Citation

Keywords

immunosenescence, multiple sclerosis, DMTs, inflamm-ageing

About this article
Title

Immunosenescence and multiple sclerosis

Journal

Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska

Issue

Vol 56, No 3 (2022)

Article type

Invited Review Article

Pages

220-227

Published online

2022-06-23

Page views

5440

Article views/downloads

1372

DOI

10.5603/PJNNS.a2022.0045

Pubmed

35735245

Bibliographic record

Neurol Neurochir Pol 2022;56(3):220-227.

Keywords

immunosenescence
multiple sclerosis
DMTs
inflamm-ageing

Authors

Monika Adamczyk-Sowa
Maria Nowak-Kiczmer
Jerzy Jaroszewicz
Thomas Berger

References (68)
  1. Martínez de Toda I, Ceprián N, Díaz-Del Cerro E, et al. The Role of Immune Cells in Oxi-Inflamm-Aging. Cells. 2021; 10(11).
  2. Prasad S, Sung B, Aggarwal BB. Age-associated chronic diseases require age-old medicine: role of chronic inflammation. Prev Med. 2012; 54 Suppl: S29–S37.
  3. Tylutka A, Zembroń-Łacny A. Immunological aging and clinical consequences. Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 2020; 74: 260–271.
  4. Ray D, Yung R. Immune senescence, epigenetics and autoimmunity. Clin Immunol. 2018; 196: 59–63.
  5. Barbé-Tuana F, Funchal G, Schmitz CR, et al. The interplay between immunosenescence and age-related diseases. Semin Immunopathol. 2020; 42(5): 545–557.
  6. Müller L, Di Benedetto S. How Immunosenescence and Inflammaging May Contribute to Hyperinflammatory Syndrome in COVID-19. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22: 12539.
  7. Johnson ND, Conneely KN. The role of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in immunosenescence. Ageing Res Rev. 2019; 51: 11–23.
  8. Kirkwood KL. Inflammaging. Immunol Invest. 2018; 47(8): 770–773.
  9. Franceschi C, Bonafè M, Valensin S, et al. Inflamm-aging. An evolutionary perspective on immunosenescence. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000; 908: 244–254.
  10. Shmulevich R, Krizhanovsky V. Cell Senescence, DNA Damage, and Metabolism. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2021; 34(4): 324–334.
  11. Xia S, Zhang X, Zheng S, et al. An Update on Inflamm-Aging: Mechanisms, Prevention, and Treatment. J Immunol Res. 2016; 2016: 8426874.
  12. Punder Kde, Heim C, Wadhwa P, et al. Stress and immunosenescence: The role of telomerase. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019; 107: 75.
  13. Cannizzo ES, Clement CC, Sahu R, et al. Oxidative stress, inflamm-aging and immunosenescence. J Proteomics. 2011; 74(11): 2313–2323.
  14. Ross OA, Hyland P, Curran MD, et al. Mitochondrial DNA damage in lymphocytes: a role in immunosenescence? Exp Gerontol. 2002; 37(2-3): 329–340.
  15. Batatinha HA, Diniz TA, de Souza Teixeira AA, et al. Regulation of autophagy as a therapy for immunosenescence-driven cancer and neurodegenerative diseases: The role of exercise. J Cell Physiol. 2019 [Epub ahead of print].
  16. Weiskopf D, Weinberger B, Grubeck-Loebenstein B. The aging of the immune system. Transpl Int. 2009; 22(11): 1041–1050.
  17. Schweitzer F, Laurent S, Fink GR, et al. Age and the risks of high-efficacy disease modifying drugs in multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2019; 32(3): 305–312.
  18. Fuentes E, Fuentes M, Alarcón M, et al. Immune System Dysfunction in the Elderly. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2017; 89(1): 285–299.
  19. Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM. Understanding immunosenescence to improve responses to vaccines. Nat Immunol. 2013; 14(5): 428–436.
  20. Xu W, Wong G, Hwang YYi, et al. The untwining of immunosenescence and aging. Semin Immunopathol. 2020; 42(5): 559–572.
  21. Fülöp T, Dupuis G, Witkowski JM, et al. The Role of Immunosenescence in the Development of Age-Related Diseases. Rev Invest Clin. 2016; 68(2): 84–91.
  22. Williams-Gray CH, Wijeyekoon RS, Scott KM, et al. Abnormalities of age-related T cell senescence in Parkinson's disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2018; 15(1): 166.
  23. DeVaughn S, Müller-Oehring EM, Markey B, et al. Aging with HIV-1 Infection: Motor Functions, Cognition, and Attention--A Comparison with Parkinson's Disease. Neuropsychol Rev. 2015; 25(4): 424–438.
  24. Pletz M. Immune-mediated neuropathies: etiology and pathogenic relationship to aging processes. Journal of Neuroimmunology. 2003; 137(1-2): 1–11.
  25. Sykes GP, Kamtchum-Tatuene J, Falcione S, et al. Aging Immune System in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Transcriptomic Analysis. Stroke. 2021; 52(4): 1355–1361.
  26. Engler-Chiurazzi EB, Monaghan KL, Wan ECK, et al. Role of B cells and the aging brain in stroke recovery and treatment. Geroscience. 2020; 42(5): 1199–1216.
  27. Bottazzi B, Riboli E, Mantovani A. Aging, inflammation and cancer. Semin Immunol. 2018; 40: 74–82.
  28. Lian J, Yue Y, Yu W, et al. Immunosenescence: a key player in cancer development. J Hematol Oncol. 2020; 13(1): 151.
  29. Glynn JR, Moss PAH. Systematic analysis of infectious disease outcomes by age shows lowest severity in school-age children. Sci Data. 2020; 7(1): 329.
  30. Grolli RE, Mingoti ME, Bertollo AG, et al. Impact of COVID-19 in the Mental Health in Elderly: Psychological and Biological Updates. Mol Neurobiol. 2021; 58(5): 1905–1916.
  31. Kadambari S, Klenerman P, Pollard AJ. Why the elderly appear to be more severely affected by COVID-19: The potential role of immunosenescence and CMV. Rev Med Virol. 2020; 30(5): e2144.
  32. Docherty AB, Harrison EM, Green CA, et al. ISARIC4C investigators. Features of 20 133 UK patients in hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ. 2020; 369: m1985.
  33. Lee L, Cazier JB, Angelis V, et al. COVID-19 mortality in patients with cancer on chemotherapy or other anticancer treatments: a prospective cohort study. The Lancet. 2020; 395(10241): 1919–1926.
  34. Zarębska-Michaluk D, Jaroszewicz J, Rogalska M, et al. Impact of Kidney Failure on the Severity of COVID-19. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(9).
  35. Perrotta F, Corbi G, Mazzeo G, et al. COVID-19 and the elderly: insights into pathogenesis and clinical decision-making. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020; 32(8): 1599–1608.
  36. Feehan J, Tripodi N, Apostolopoulos V. The twilight of the immune system: The impact of immunosenescence in aging. Maturitas. 2021; 147: 7–13.
  37. Wherry EJ. T cell exhaustion. Nat Immunol. 2011; 12(6): 492–499.
  38. Jaroszewicz J, Calle Serrano B, Wursthorn K, et al. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels in the natural history of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infection: a European perspective. J Hepatol. 2010; 52(4): 514–522.
  39. Fülöp T, Larbi A, Pawelec G. Human T cell aging and the impact of persistent viral infections. Front Immunol. 2013; 4: 271.
  40. Wong Y, Meehan MT, Burrows SR, et al. Estimating the global burden of Epstein-Barr virus-related cancers. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022; 148(1): 31–46.
  41. Hoehl S, Berger A, Ciesek S, et al. Thirty years of CMV seroprevalence-a longitudinal analysis in a German university hospital. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020; 39(6): 1095–1102.
  42. Weltevrede M, Eilers R, de Melker HE, et al. Cytomegalovirus persistence and T-cell immunosenescence in people aged fifty and older: A systematic review. Exp Gerontol. 2016; 77: 87–95.
  43. Gate D, Saligrama N, Leventhal O, et al. Clonally expanded CD8 T cells patrol the cerebrospinal fluid in Alzheimer's disease. Nature. 2020; 577(7790): 399–404.
  44. Diebel LWM, Rockwood K. Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers. Curr Oncol Rep. 2021; 23(9): 104.
  45. Baker GT, Sprott RL. Biomarkers of aging. Exp Gerontol. 1988; 23(4-5): 223–239.
  46. Jylhävä J, Pedersen N, Hägg S. Biological Age Predictors. EBioMedicine. 2017; 21: 29–36.
  47. Piehl F. Current and emerging disease-modulatory therapies and treatment targets for multiple sclerosis. J Intern Med. 2021; 289(6): 771–791.
  48. Dema M, Eixarch H, Villar LM, et al. Immunosenescence in multiple sclerosis: the identification of new therapeutic targets. Autoimmun Rev. 2021; 20(9): 102893.
  49. Perdaens O, van Pesch V. Molecular Mechanisms of Immunosenescene and Inflammaging: Relevance to the Immunopathogenesis and Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis. Front Neurol. 2021; 12: 811518.
  50. Vaughn CB, Jakimovski D, Kavak KS, et al. Epidemiology and treatment of multiple sclerosis in elderly populations. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019; 15(6): 329–342.
  51. Eschborn M, Pawlitzki M, Wirth T, et al. Evaluation of Age-Dependent Immune Signatures in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2021; 8(6).
  52. Bühring J, Hecker M, Fitzner B, et al. Systematic Review of Studies on Telomere Length in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Aging Dis. 2021; 12(5): 1272–1286.
  53. Krysko KM, Henry RG, Cree BAC, et al. University of California, San Francisco MS-EPIC Team. Telomere Length Is Associated with Disability Progression in Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2019; 86(5): 671–682.
  54. Hecker M, Fitzner B, Jäger K, et al. Leukocyte Telomere Length in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Its Association with Clinical Phenotypes. Mol Neurobiol. 2021; 58(6): 2886–2896.
  55. Zeydan B, Kantarci OH. Impact of Age on Multiple Sclerosis Disease Activity and Progression. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020; 20(7): 24.
  56. Schwehr NA, Kuntz KM, Butler M, et al. BeAMS Study Group. Age-related decreases in relapses among adults with relapsing-onset multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2020; 26(12): 1510–1518.
  57. Paz Soldán MM, Novotna M, Abou Zeid N, et al. Relapses and disability accumulation in progressive multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2015; 84(1): 81–88.
  58. Tortorella C, Bellacosa A, Paolicelli D, et al. Age-related gadolinium-enhancement of MRI brain lesions in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2005; 239(1): 95–99.
  59. Koch MW, Mostert J, Zhang Y, et al. Association of Age With Contrast-Enhancing Lesions Across the Multiple Sclerosis Disease Spectrum. Neurology. 2021; 97(13): e1334–e1342.
  60. Marrie RA, Patten SB, Tremlett H, et al. Sex differences in comorbidity at diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A population-based study. Neurology. 2016; 86(14): 1279–1286.
  61. Edwards NC, Munsell M, Menzin J, et al. Comorbidity in US patients with multiple sclerosis. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2018; 9: 97–102.
  62. Weideman AM, Tapia-Maltos MA, Johnson K, et al. Meta-analysis of the Age-Dependent Efficacy of Multiple Sclerosis Treatments. Front Neurol. 2017; 8: 577.
  63. Jakimovski D, Eckert SP, Zivadinov R, et al. Considering patient age when treating multiple sclerosis across the adult lifespan. Expert Rev Neurother. 2021; 21(3): 353–364.
  64. Kallmann BA, Ries S, Kullmann JS, et al. Teriflunomide in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: outcomes by age and pre-treatment status. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2021; 14: 17562864211005588.
  65. Prosperini L, Scarpazza C, Imberti L, et al. Age as a risk factor for early onset of natalizumab-related progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. J Neurovirol. 2017; 23(5): 742–749.
  66. Bsteh G, Feige J, Ehling R, et al. Discontinuation of disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis - Clinical outcome and prognostic factors. Mult Scler. 2017; 23(9): 1241–1248.
  67. Kister I, Spelman T, Alroughani R, et al. MSBase Study Group. Discontinuing disease-modifying therapy in MS after a prolonged relapse-free period: a propensity score-matched study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016; 87(10): 1133–1137.
  68. Hua LeH, Fan TH, Conway D, et al. Discontinuation of disease-modifying therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis over age 60. Mult Scler. 2019; 25(5): 699–708.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl