open access

Vol 56, No 1 (2022)
Letter to the Editors
Submitted: 2021-05-26
Accepted: 2021-06-22
Published online: 2021-08-03
Get Citation

Neuroplasticity vs. cognitive prediction models in acute ischaemic stroke: limitations must be remembered

Ingrid Xiomara Tibocha-Gordon1, Vanessa Morales-Ospina2, Yudex Abraham Vergara-Jacome1, Ivan David Lozada-Martinez34
·
Pubmed: 34346050
·
Neurol Neurochir Pol 2022;56(1):101-102.
Affiliations
  1. School of Medicine, University Corporation Rafael Nuñez, Cartagena, Colombia
  2. School of Medicine, Pontifical Bolivarian University, Bogotá, Colombia
  3. Colombian Clinical Research Group in Neurocritical Care, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia
  4. Latin American Council of Neurocritical Care, Cartagena, Colombia

open access

Vol 56, No 1 (2022)
Letters to the Editors
Submitted: 2021-05-26
Accepted: 2021-06-22
Published online: 2021-08-03

Abstract

Not applicable

Abstract

Not applicable

Get Citation

Keywords

ischaemic stroke, neuronal plasticity, stroke rehabilitation, cerebrovascular disorders, prognosis

About this article
Title

Neuroplasticity vs. cognitive prediction models in acute ischaemic stroke: limitations must be remembered

Journal

Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska

Issue

Vol 56, No 1 (2022)

Article type

Letter to the Editors

Pages

101-102

Published online

2021-08-03

Page views

5449

Article views/downloads

619

DOI

10.5603/PJNNS.a2021.0053

Pubmed

34346050

Bibliographic record

Neurol Neurochir Pol 2022;56(1):101-102.

Keywords

ischaemic stroke
neuronal plasticity
stroke rehabilitation
cerebrovascular disorders
prognosis

Authors

Ingrid Xiomara Tibocha-Gordon
Vanessa Morales-Ospina
Yudex Abraham Vergara-Jacome
Ivan David Lozada-Martinez

References (8)
  1. Esmael A, Elsherief M, Eltoukhy K. Prevalence of cognitive impairment in acute ischaemic stroke and use of Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECTS) for early prediction of post-stroke cognitive impairment. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2021; 55(2): 179–185.
  2. Dąbrowski J, Czajka A, Zielińska-Turek J, et al. Brain functional reserve in the context of neuroplasticity after stroke. Neural Plast. 2019; 2019: 9708905.
  3. Felling RJ, Song H. Epigenetic mechanisms of neuroplasticity and the implications for stroke recovery. Exp Neurol. 2015; 268: 37–45.
  4. Xing Y, Bai Y. A review of exercise-induced neuroplasticity in ischemic stroke: pathology and mechanisms. Mol Neurobiol. 2020; 57(10): 4218–4231.
  5. Farokhi-Sisakht F, Farhoudi M, Sadigh-Eteghad S, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation improves ischemic stroke-induced cognitive impairment: role of growth factors. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019; 28(10): 104299.
  6. World Health Organization. Global Burden of Neurological Disorders: Estimates and Projections. https://www.who.int/mental_health/neurology/chapter_2_neuro_disorders_public_h_challenges.pdf (Consulted 26 May 2021).
  7. Coen RF, Robertson DA, Kenny RA, et al. Strengths and limitations of the MoCA for assessing cognitive functioning: findings from a large representative sample of Irish older adults. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2016; 29(1): 18–24.
  8. Sokołowska N, Sokołowski R, Oleksy E, et al. Usefulness of the Polish versions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment 7.2 and the Mini-Mental State Examination as screening instruments for the detection of mild neurocognitive disorder. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2020; 54(5): 440–448.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl