Vol 54, No 5 (2020)
Guidelines
Published online: 2020-10-21

open access

Page views 3472
Article views/downloads 1340
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Recommendations of the Polish Medical Society of Radiology and the Polish Society of Neurology for a protocol concerning routinely used magnetic resonance imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis

Marek Sąsiadek1, Marcin Hartel2, Małgorzata Siger3, Katarzyna Katulska4, Agata Majos5, Ewa Kluczewska6, Halina Bartosik-Psujek7, Alina Kułakowska8, Agnieszka Słowik9, Barbara Steinborn10, Monika Adamczyk-Sowa11, Alicja Kalinowska12, Ewa Krzystanek13, Robert Bonek14, Zbigniew Serafin15, Jarosław Sławek16, Przemysław Nowacki17, Adam Stępień18, Sergiusz Jóżwiak19, Konrad Rejdak20, Krzysztof Selmaj21, Jerzy Walecki22
Pubmed: 33085075
Neurol Neurochir Pol 2020;54(5):410-415.

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a widely used method for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis that is essential for the detection and follow-up of the disease.

Objective: The Polish Medical Society of Radiology (PLTR) and the Polish Society of Neurology (PTN) present the second version of their recommendations for investigations routinely conducted in magnetic resonance imaging departments in patients with multiple sclerosis. This version includes new data and practical comments for electroradiology technologists and radiologists. The recommended protocol aims to improve the MRI procedure and, most importantly, to standardise the method of conducting scans in all MRI departments. This is crucial for the initial diagnostics necessary for establishing a diagnosis, as well as for MS patient monitoring, which directly translates into significant clinical decisions.

Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune mediated inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS), the aetiology of which is still unknown. The nature of the disease lies in a CNS destruction process disseminated in time (DIT) and space (DIS). MRI detects focal lesions in the white and grey matter with high sensitivity (although with significantly lower specificity in the latter). It is also the best tool to assess brain atrophy in patients with MS in terms of grey matter volume (GMV) and white matter volume (WMV) as well as local atrophy (by measuring the volume of thalamus, corpus callosum, subcortical nuclei, and hippocampus) as parameters that correlate with disability progression and cognitive dysfunctions.

Progress in MR techniques, as well as advances in postprocessing the obtained data, has driven the dynamic development of computer programs that allow for a more repeatable assessment of brain atrophy in both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.

MR imaging is unquestionably the best diagnostic tool available to follow up the course of the disease and support clinicians in choosing the most appropriate treatment strategy for their MS patient. However, to diagnose and follow up MS patients on the basis of MRI in accordance with the latest standards, the MRI study must adhere to certain quality criteria. Such criteria are the subject of this paper.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Rovira À, Wattjes MP, Tintoré M, et al. MAGNIMS study group. Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis-clinical implementation in the diagnostic process. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015; 11(8): 471–482.
  2. Miller DH, Filippi M, Fazekas F, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging within diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2004; 56(2): 273–278.
  3. Simon JH, Traboulsee A, et al. Standardized MR Imaging Protocol for Multiple Sclerosis: Consortium of MS Centers Consensus Guidelines. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol . 2006.
  4. Polaman CH, Reingold SC, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to McDonald criteria. Annals of Neurology. 2011.
  5. Alroughani R, Al Hashel J, Lamdhade S, et al. Predictors of Conversion to Multiple Sclerosis in Patients with Clinical Isolated Syndrome Using the 2010 Revised McDonald Criteria. ISRN Neurol. 2012; 2012: 792192.
  6. Kelly SB, Kinsella K, Duggan M, et al. A proposed modification to the McDonald 2010 criteria for the diagnosis of primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2013; 19(8): 1095–1100.
  7. Traboulsee A, Simon JH, Stone L, et al. Revised Recommendations of the Consortium of MS Centers Task Force for a Standardized MRI Protocol and Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Multiple Sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016; 37(3): 394–401.
  8. Thompson A, Bandwel B, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 subtype of McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurology. ; 2017.
  9. De Stefano N, Airas L, Grigoriadis N, et al. Clinical relevance of brain volume measures in multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs. 2014; 28(2): 147–156.
  10. Zivadinov R, Jakimovski D, Gandhi S, et al. Clinical relevance of brain atrophy assessment in multiple sclerosis. Implications for its use in a clinical routine. Expert Rev Neurother. 2016; 16(7): 777–793.
  11. Zivadinov R, Dwyer M, Bergsland N. Brain atrophy measurements should be used to guide therapy monitoring in MS – YES. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2016; 22(12): 1522–1524.
  12. Sąsiadek M, Katulska K, Majos A, et al. Guidelines of the Polish Medical Society of radiology for the routinely used MRI protocol in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2018; 52(6): 638–642.
  13. Sastre-Garriga J, Pareto D, Battaglini M, et al. MAGNIMS study group. MAGNIMS consensus recommendations on the use of brain and spinal cord atrophy measures in clinical practice. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020; 16(3): 171–182.



Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska