Vol 53, No 5 (2019)
Invited Review Article
Published online: 2019-10-30

open access

Page views 3688
Article views/downloads 3207
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Novel emerging treatments for NMOSD

Krzysztof Selmaj12, Igor Selmaj2
Pubmed: 31664710
Neurol Neurochir Pol 2019;53(5):317-326.

Abstract

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) that cause optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, and some other CNS syndromes. Recently, diagnosis and understanding of these diseases has been markedly enhanced by the discovery that serum autoantibodies that target aquaporin-4 (AQP4) are strongly associated with the disease. This spectrum includes also a potential subset of patients with a phenotype of NMOSD who have anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody. Although steroids and immunosuppressive drugs have been widely used for NMOSD treatment, until recently there was no approved therapy for these diseases. With improved understanding of the pathophysiology of NMOSD, numerous new therapeutic strategies have recently been evaluated. The results of these studies, involving monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) inhibiting terminal complement protein cleavage interfering with interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6 R) signaling and depleting CD19-positive B cells, have been published in recent months. All of these new therapeutics have shown a high degree of efficacy in diminishing NMOSD activity and inhibiting disability progression. At the same time, all these mAbs have demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability profiles, with a limited rate of adverse events. The first of these new drugs, eculizumab, have been approved in USA and Europe for NMOSD treatment within the last couple of months and it is expected that the other novel, effective and safe treatments for NMOSD will be approved in the near future.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Flanagan EP, Weinshenker BG. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2014; 14(9): 483.
  2. Lennon VA, Wingerchuk DM, Kryzer TJ, et al. A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2004; 364(9451): 2106–2112.
  3. Hinson SR, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, et al. Pathogenic potential of IgG binding to water channel extracellular domain in neuromyelitis optica. Neurology. 2007; 69(24): 2221–2231.
  4. Bennett JL, Lam C, Kalluri SR, et al. Intrathecal pathogenic anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies in early neuromyelitis optica. Ann Neurol. 2009; 66(5): 617–629.
  5. Takahashi T, Fujihara K, Nakashima I, et al. Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody is involved in the pathogenesis of NMO: a study on antibody titre. Brain. 2007; 130(Pt 5): 1235–1243.
  6. Jarius S, Aboul-Enein F, Waters P, et al. Antibody to aquaporin-4 in the long-term course of neuromyelitis optica. Brain. 2008; 131(Pt 11): 3072–3080.
  7. Papadopoulos M, Verkman AS. Aquaporin 4 and neuromyelitis optica. The Lancet Neurology. 2012; 11(6): 535–544.
  8. Bradl M, Reindl M, Lassmann H. Mechanisms for lesion localization in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Curr Opin Neurol. 2018; 31(3): 325–333.
  9. Sato DK, Callegaro D, Lana-Peixoto MA, et al. Distinction between MOG antibody-positive and AQP4 antibody-positive NMO spectrum disorders. Neurology. 2014; 82(6): 474–481.
  10. Ikeda K, Kiyota N, Kuroda H, et al. Severe demyelination but no astrocytopathy in clinically definite neuromyelitis optica with anti-myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody. Mult Scler. 2015; 21(5): 656–659.
  11. Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, et al. International Panel for NMO Diagnosis. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology. 2015; 85(2): 177–189.
  12. Sechi E, Morris PP, McKeon A, et al. Glial fibrillary acidic protein IgG related myelitis: characterisation and comparison with aquaporin-4-IgG myelitis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019; 90(4): 488–490.
  13. Abboud H, Petrak A, Mealy M, et al. Treatment of acute relapses in neuromyelitis optica: Steroids alone versus steroids plus plasma exchange. Mult Scler. 2016; 22(2): 185–192.
  14. Watanabe S, Nakashima I, Misu T, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of plasma exchange in NMO-IgG-positive patients with neuromyelitis optica. Mult Scler. 2007; 13(1): 128–132.
  15. Reindl M, Waters P. Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies in neurological disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019; 15(2): 89–102.
  16. Elsone L, Panicker J, Mutch K, et al. Role of intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of acute relapses of neuromyelitis optica: experience in 10 patients. Mult Scler. 2014; 20(4): 501–504.
  17. Sellner J, Boggild M, Clanet M, et al. EFNS guidelines on diagnosis and management of neuromyelitis optica. Eur J Neurol. 2010; 17(8): 1019–1032.
  18. Kimbrough DJ, Fujihara K, Jacob A, et al. GJCF-CC&BR. Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica: Review and Recommendations. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2012; 1(4): 180–187.
  19. Elsone L, Kitley J, Luppe S, et al. Long-term efficacy, tolerability and retention rate of azathioprine in 103 aquaporin-4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patients: a multicentre retrospective observational study from the UK. Mult Scler. 2014; 20(11): 1533–1540.
  20. Cabre P, Olindo S, Marignier R, et al. Aegis of French National Observatory of Multiple Sclerosis. Efficacy of mitoxantrone in neuromyelitis optica spectrum: clinical and neuroradiological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013; 84(5): 511–516.
  21. Awad A, Stüve O. Cyclophosphamide in multiple sclerosis: scientific rationale, history and novel treatment paradigms. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2009; 2(6): 50–61.
  22. Montcuquet A, Collongues N, Papeix C, et al. NOMADMUS study group and the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP). Effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil as first-line therapy in AQP4-IgG, MOG-IgG, and seronegative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Mult Scler. 2017; 23(10): 1377–1384.
  23. Huh SY, Kim SH, Hyun JW, et al. Mycophenolate Mofetil in the Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. JAMA Neurology. 2014; 71(11): 1372.
  24. Hughes RAC, Donofrio P, Bril V, et al. ICE Study Group. Intravenous immune globulin (10% caprylate-chromatography purified) for the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (ICE study): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008; 7(2): 136–144.
  25. Dalakas M. IVIg in other autoimmune neurological disorders: current status and future prospects. J Neurol. 2008; 255 Suppl 3: 12–16.
  26. Magraner MJ, Coret F, Casanova B. The effect of intravenous immunoglobulin on neuromyelitis optica. Neurologia. 2013; 28(2): 65–72.
  27. Viswanathan S, Wong AHY, Quek AML, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin may reduce relapse frequency in neuromyelitis optica. J Neuroimmunol. 2015; 282: 92–96.
  28. Cabre P, Mejdoubi M, Jeannin S, et al. Francophone Society of Multiple Sclerosis and OFSEP investigators. Treatment of neuromyelitis optica with rituximab: a 2-year prospective multicenter study. J Neurol. 2018; 265(4): 917–925.
  29. Alldredge B, Jordan A, Imitola J, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab: Experience of a Single Multiple Sclerosis Center. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2018; 41(2): 56–59.
  30. Gao F, Chai B, Gu C, et al. Effectiveness of rituximab in neuromyelitis optica: a meta-analysis. BMC Neurol. 2019; 19(1): 36.
  31. Brachet G, Bourquard T, Gallay N, et al. Eculizumab epitope on complement C5: Progress towards a better understanding of the mechanism of action. Mol Immunol. 2016; 77: 126–131.
  32. Soltys J, Liu Y, Ritchie A, et al. Membrane assembly of aquaporin-4 autoantibodies regulates classical complement activation in neuromyelitis optica. J Clin Invest. 2019; 129(5): 2000–2013.
  33. Yao X, Verkman AS. Complement regulator CD59 prevents peripheral organ injury in rats made seropositive for neuromyelitis optica immunoglobulin G. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2017; 5(1): 57.
  34. Pittock SJ, Berthele A, Fujihara K, et al. Eculizumab in Aquaporin-4-Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381(7): 614–625.
  35. Benamu E, Montoya JG. Infections associated with the use of eculizumab: recommendations for prevention and prophylaxis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2016; 29(4): 319–329.
  36. Horellou P, Wang M, Keo V, et al. Increased interleukin-6 correlates with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies in pediatric monophasic demyelinating diseases and multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2015; 289: 1–7.
  37. Kieseier BC, Stüve O, Dehmel T, et al. Disease amelioration with tocilizumab in a treatment-resistant patient with neuromyelitis optica: implication for cellular immune responses. JAMA Neurol. 2013; 70(3): 390–393.
  38. Araki M, Matsuoka T, Miyamoto K, et al. Efficacy of the anti-IL-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab in neuromyelitis optica: a pilot study. Neurology. 2014; 82(15): 1302–1306.
  39. Ringelstein M, Ayzenberg I, Harmel J, et al. Long-term Therapy With Interleukin 6 Receptor Blockade in Highly Active Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. JAMA Neurol. 2015; 72(7): 756–763.
  40. Zhang C, Zhang M, Qiu W, et al. Tocilizumab versus Azathioprine in highly relapsing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (TANGO): a head-to-head comparative study. Multiple Sclerosis J. 2019; 25(S2): 44.
  41. Kaplon H, Reichert JM. Antibodies to watch in 2018. MAbs. 2018; 10(2): 183–203.
  42. Ayzenberg I, Kleiter I, Schröder A, et al. Interleukin 6 receptor blockade in patients with neuromyelitis optica nonresponsive to anti-CD20 therapy. JAMA Neurol. 2013; 70(3): 394–397.
  43. Uchida T, Mori M, Uzawa A, et al. Increased cerebrospinal fluid metalloproteinase-2 and interleukin-6 are associated with albumin quotient in neuromyelitis optica: Their possible role on blood-brain barrier disruption. Mult Scler. 2017; 23(8): 1072–1084.
  44. Kimura A, Naka T, Kishimoto T. IL-6-dependent and -independent pathways in the development of interleukin 17-producing T helper cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(29): 12099–12104.
  45. Igawa T, Ishii S, Tachibana T, et al. Antibody recycling by engineered pH-dependent antigen binding improves the duration of antigen neutralization. Nat Biotechnol. 2010; 28(11): 1203–1207.
  46. de Se, Kleiter I, Fujihara K, et al. et al.. A double-blind placebo-controlled study of satralizumab (SA237), a recycling anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, as add-on therapy for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). MS Journal 2018, 24: issue 2 suppl. : abstract.
  47. Bennett, B. Greenberg, A. Traboulsee, Efficacy of satralizumab as monotherapy in pre-specified subgroups of SAkuraStar, a double-blind placebo-controlled Phase 3 clinical study in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD)J.L. Multiple Sclerosis J. 2019; 25(S2): 44.
  48. Chen D, Gallagher S, Monson NL, et al. Inebilizumab, a B Cell-Depleting Anti-CD19 Antibody for the Treatment of Autoimmune Neurological Diseases: Insights from Preclinical Studies. J Clin Med. 2016; 5(12).
  49. Cree BAC, Bennett JL, Kim HoJ, et al. N-MOmentum study investigators. Inebilizumab for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (N-MOmentum): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019; 394(10206): 1352–1363.
  50. Jarius S, Paul F, Franciotta D, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid findings in aquaporin-4 antibody positive neuromyelitis optica: results from 211 lumbar punctures. J Neurol Sci. 2011; 306(1-2): 82–90.
  51. Michael BD, Elsone L, Griffiths MJ, et al. Post-acute serum eosinophil and neutrophil-associated cytokine/chemokine profile can distinguish between patients with neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis; and identifies potential pathophysiological mechanisms - a pilot study. Cytokine. 2013; 64(1): 90–96.
  52. Tradtrantip L, Ratelade J, Zhang H, et al. Enzymatic deglycosylation converts pathogenic neuromyelitis optica anti-aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G into therapeutic antibody. Ann Neurol. 2013; 73(1): 77–85.
  53. Tradtrantip L, Asavapanumas N, Verkman AS. Therapeutic cleavage of anti-aquaporin-4 autoantibody in neuromyelitis optica by an IgG-selective proteinase. Mol Pharmacol. 2013; 83(6): 1268–1275.
  54. Verkman AS, Phuan PW, Asavapanumas N, et al. Biology of AQP4 and anti-AQP4 antibody: therapeutic implications for NMO. Brain Pathol. 2013; 23(6): 684–695.
  55. Verkman AS, Smith AJ, Phuan PW, et al. The aquaporin-4 water channel as a potential drug target in neurological disorders. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2017; 21(12): 1161–1170.
  56. Saadoun S, Waters P, MacDonald C, et al. Neutrophil protease inhibition reduces neuromyelitis optica-immunoglobulin G-induced damage in mouse brain. Ann Neurol. 2012; 71(3): 323–333.
  57. Herges K, de Jong BA, Kolkowitz I, et al. Protective effect of an elastase inhibitor in a neuromyelitis optica-like disease driven by a peptide of myelin oligodendroglial glycoprotein. Mult Scler. 2012; 18(4): 398–408.
  58. Domon H, Nagai K, Maekawa T, et al. Neutrophil Elastase Subverts the Immune Response by Cleaving Toll-Like Receptors and Cytokines in Pneumococcal Pneumonia. Front Immunol. 2018; 9: 732.
  59. Muroishi T, Sakai K, Yanase D, et al. Serum anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder presenting as acute eosinophilic encephalomyelitis. J Clin Neurosci. 2018; 48: 93–94.
  60. Zhang H, Verkman AS. Eosinophil pathogenicity mechanisms and therapeutics in neuromyelitis optica. J Clin Invest. 2013; 123(5): 2306–2316.
  61. Katz Sand I, Fabian MT, Telford R, et al. Open-label, add-on trial of cetirizine for neuromyelitis optica. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2018; 5(2): e441.
  62. Zhang C, Tian DC, Yang CS, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Bortezomib in Patients With Highly Relapsing Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. JAMA Neurol. 2017; 74(8): 1010–1012.