open access

Vol 53, No 3 (2019)
Research Paper
Submitted: 2018-11-06
Accepted: 2018-11-06
Published online: 2019-03-11
Get Citation

Quantitative volumetric analysis of primary glioblastoma multiforme on MRI and 11C-methionine PET: initial study on five patients

Jingwang Zhao1, Zhijuan Chen2, Li Cai3, Shaoya Yin1, Weidong Yang4, Zengguang Wang2
·
Pubmed: 30855705
·
Neurol Neurochir Pol 2019;53(3):199-204.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, No. 6 Jizhao Road, Jinnan District, Tianjin, China
  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
  3. Department of PET-CT Diagnostic, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, No. 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, Tianjin, China
  4. Tianjin Neurological Institute, No. 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, Tianjin, China

open access

Vol 53, No 3 (2019)
Research papers
Submitted: 2018-11-06
Accepted: 2018-11-06
Published online: 2019-03-11

Abstract

To investigate the discrepancy between 11C-methionine (MET) positron emission tomography (PET) and MRI results in primary glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) through three-dimensional (3D) volumetric analysis, we retrospectively analysed patients with primary GBM who underwent preoperative 3D MRI and MET PET and were operated between June 2016 and January 2017. Tumour delineation and volumetric analysis were conducted using MRIcron software. Tumour volumes defined by MRI (VMRI) were manually drawn slice by slice in axial and sagittal or coronal images of enhanced T1 sequence, while metabolic tumour volumes were automatically segmented in MET PET (VMET) based on three (frontal, occipital and temporal) 3D reference volumes of interest (VOI). Discrepancies were evaluated in terms of both absolute volume and percentage on the combined images. MET PET contours contained and extended beyond MRI contours in all five patients; in a subset of cases, MET PET contours extended to the contralateral hemisphere. The discrepancy between MET uptake and MRI results was 27.67 cm3 (4.20–51.20 cm3), i.e. approximately 39.0% (17.4–64.3%) of the metabolic tumour volume was located outside the volumes of the Gd-enhanced area. Metabolic tumour volume is substantially underestimated by Gd-enhanced area in patients with primary GBM. Quantitative volumetric information derived from MET uptake is useful in defining tumour targets and designing individualised therapy strategies in primary GBM.

Abstract

To investigate the discrepancy between 11C-methionine (MET) positron emission tomography (PET) and MRI results in primary glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) through three-dimensional (3D) volumetric analysis, we retrospectively analysed patients with primary GBM who underwent preoperative 3D MRI and MET PET and were operated between June 2016 and January 2017. Tumour delineation and volumetric analysis were conducted using MRIcron software. Tumour volumes defined by MRI (VMRI) were manually drawn slice by slice in axial and sagittal or coronal images of enhanced T1 sequence, while metabolic tumour volumes were automatically segmented in MET PET (VMET) based on three (frontal, occipital and temporal) 3D reference volumes of interest (VOI). Discrepancies were evaluated in terms of both absolute volume and percentage on the combined images. MET PET contours contained and extended beyond MRI contours in all five patients; in a subset of cases, MET PET contours extended to the contralateral hemisphere. The discrepancy between MET uptake and MRI results was 27.67 cm3 (4.20–51.20 cm3), i.e. approximately 39.0% (17.4–64.3%) of the metabolic tumour volume was located outside the volumes of the Gd-enhanced area. Metabolic tumour volume is substantially underestimated by Gd-enhanced area in patients with primary GBM. Quantitative volumetric information derived from MET uptake is useful in defining tumour targets and designing individualised therapy strategies in primary GBM.

Get Citation

Keywords

Volumetric analysis, glioblastoma multiforme, MRI, 11C-methionine

About this article
Title

Quantitative volumetric analysis of primary glioblastoma multiforme on MRI and 11C-methionine PET: initial study on five patients

Journal

Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska

Issue

Vol 53, No 3 (2019)

Article type

Research Paper

Pages

199-204

Published online

2019-03-11

Page views

1366

Article views/downloads

1083

DOI

10.5603/PJNNS.a2019.0009

Pubmed

30855705

Bibliographic record

Neurol Neurochir Pol 2019;53(3):199-204.

Keywords

Volumetric analysis
glioblastoma multiforme
MRI
11C-methionine

Authors

Jingwang Zhao
Zhijuan Chen
Li Cai
Shaoya Yin
Weidong Yang
Zengguang Wang

References (24)
  1. Komori T, Sasaki H, Yoshida K. [Revised WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System:Summary of the Revision and Perspective]. No Shinkei Geka. 2016; 44(8): 625–635.
  2. Faguer R, Tanguy JY, Rousseau A, et al. Early presentation of primary glioblastoma. Neurochirurgie. 2014; 60(4): 188–193.
  3. Stupp R, Tonn JC, Brada M, et al. High-grade malignant glioma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology. 2010; 21(Supplement 5): v190–v193.
  4. Grosu AL, Weber WA, Riedel E, et al. L-(methyl-11C) methionine positron emission tomography for target delineation in resected high-grade gliomas before radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 63(1): 64–74.
  5. Kelly P, Daumas-Duport C, Kispert D, et al. Imaging-based stereotaxic serial biopsies in untreated intracranial glial neoplasms. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1987; 66(6): 865–874.
  6. Watanabe M, Tanaka R, Takeda N. Magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology of cerebral gliomas. Neuroradiology. 1992; 34(6): 463–469.
  7. Miwa K, Shinoda J, Yano H, et al. Discrepancy between lesion distributions on methionine PET and MR images in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: insight from a PET and MR fusion image study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004; 75(10): 1457–1462.
  8. Jacobs AH, Li H, Winkeler A, et al. PET-based molecular imaging in neuroscience. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2003; 30(7): 1051–1065.
  9. Ogawa T, Shishido F, Kanno I, et al. Cerebral glioma: evaluation with methionine PET. Radiology. 1993; 186(1): 45–53.
  10. Okita Y, Kinoshita M, Goto T, et al. 11C-methionine uptake correlates with tumor cell density rather than with microvessel density in glioma: A stereotactic image-histology comparison. NeuroImage. 2010; 49(4): 2977–2982.
  11. Jiang H, Cui Y, Liu X, et al. Patient-Specific Resection Strategy of Glioblastoma Multiforme: Choice Based on a Preoperative Scoring Scale. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2017; 24(7): 2006–2014.
  12. Lucas J, Serrano N, Kim H, et al. 11C-Methionine positron emission tomography delineates non-contrast enhancing tumor regions at high risk for recurrence in pediatric high-grade glioma. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 2017; 132(1): 163–170.
  13. Susheela SP, Revannasiddaiah S, Madhusudhan N, et al. The demonstration of extension of high-grade glioma beyond magnetic resonance imaging defined edema by the use of (11) C-methionine positron emission tomography. J Cancer Res Ther. 2013; 9(4): 715–717.
  14. Pirotte B, Levivier M, Goldman S, et al. POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY-GUIDED VOLUMETRIC RESECTION OF SUPRATENTORIAL HIGH-GRADE GLIOMAS. Neurosurgery. 2009; 64(3): 471–481.
  15. Yoo M, Paeng J, Cheon G, et al. Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume on 11C-Methionine PET in Predicting Progression-Free Survival in High-Grade Glioma. Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2015; 49(4): 291–297.
  16. Tanaka Y, Nariai T, Momose T, et al. Glioma surgery using a multimodal navigation system with integrated metabolic images. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2009; 110(1): 163–172.
  17. Pirotte B, Goldman S, Dewitte O, et al. Integrated positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging–guided resection of brain tumors: a report of 103 consecutive procedures. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2006; 104(2): 238–253.
  18. Arbizu J, Tejada S, Marti-Climent JM, et al. Quantitative volumetric analysis of gliomas with sequential MRI and 11C-methionine PET assessment: patterns of integration in therapy planning. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2012; 39(5): 771–781.
  19. Galldiks N, Ullrich R, Schroeter M, et al. Volumetry of [(11)C]-methionine PET uptake and MRI contrast enhancement in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010; 37(1): 84–92.
  20. Kracht LW, Miletic H, Busch S, et al. Delineation of brain tumor extent with [11C]L-methionine positron emission tomography: local comparison with stereotactic histopathology. Clin Cancer Res. 2004; 10(21): 7163–7170.
  21. Brown T, Brennan M, Li M, et al. Association of the Extent of Resection With Survival in Glioblastoma. JAMA Oncology. 2016; 2(11): 1460.
  22. Kracht L, Friese M, Herholz K, et al. Methyl-[11C]-l-methionine uptake as measured by positron emission tomography correlates to microvessel density in patients with glioma. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2003; 30(6): 868–873.
  23. Kato T, Shinoda J, Nakayama N, et al. Metabolic Assessment of Gliomas Using11C-Methionine, [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose, and11C-Choline Positron-Emission Tomography. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2008; 29(6): 1176–1182.
  24. Singhal T, Narayanan TK, Jacobs MP, et al. 11C-Methionine PET for Grading and Prognostication in Gliomas: A Comparison Study with 18F-FDG PET and Contrast Enhancement on MRI. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2012; 53(11): 1709–1715.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl