Online first
Research Paper
Published online: 2024-08-05

open access

Page views 139
Article views/downloads 86
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Assessment of acute neuronal injury in critical illness: prognostication in septic shock patients — preliminary study in a Polish population

Michał P. Pluta123, Piotr F. Czempik3, Joanna Natorska45, Łukasz J. Krzych12

Abstract

Introduction. Sepsis-associated brain dysfunction is a common organ dysfunction in sepsis. The main goal of this study was to verify whether the combined assessment of central nervous system injury markers (i.e. S100B, NSE, GFAP) and disease severity as per the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) classification systems, would increase the accuracy of death prediction in septic shock.

Material and methods.
Markers of neuronal damage were determined in 55 patients diagnosed with septic shock with no previous neurological disease. Clinical data was collected and the scores on the APACHE II, SAPS II and SOFA prognostic scales were calculated. Death before discharge from the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) was established as the endpoint.

Results.
Nineteen patients (35%) died before ICU discharge. Patients who died had significantly higher S100B and NSE values, and APACHE II, SAPS II and SOFA scores (P< 0.05 for all). At the time of septic shock diagnosis, NSE levels more accurately predicted the risk of death before ICU discharge than S100B. However, NSE had no better predictive value for short-term mortality than APACHE II, SAPS II and SOFA. Adding C-reactive protein (CRP) and S100B concentrations to the APACHE II score created a predictive model with 95% mortality accuracy (AUC = 0.95; 95%CI 0.85–0.99; P = 0.03).

Conclusions.
The assessment of acute neuronal injury plays an important role in prognostication in patients with septic shock. The concentration of S100B protein in combination with APACHE II score and concentration of CRP more accurately predicts mortality than the APACHE II alone.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Priorities for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Critical Illness. Crit Care Med. 2021; 49(4): 598–622.
  2. Singer M, Deutschman C, Seymour C, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315(8): 801.
  3. Bauer M, Gerlach H, Vogelmann T, et al. Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Europe, North America and Australia between 2009 and 2019- results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2020; 24(1): 239.
  4. Lambden S, Laterre PF, Levy MM, et al. The SOFA score-development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials. Crit Care. 2019; 23(1): 374.
  5. Sonneville R, Verdonk F, Rauturier C, et al. Understanding brain dysfunction in sepsis. Ann Intensive Care. 2013; 3(1): 15.
  6. Czempik PF, Pluta MP, Krzych ŁJ. Sepsis-Associated Brain Dysfunction: A Review of Current Literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(16).
  7. Sekino N, Selim M, Shehadah A. Sepsis-associated brain injury: underlying mechanisms and potential therapeutic strategies for acute and long-term cognitive impairments. J Neuroinflammation. 2022; 19(1): 101.
  8. Bangshøj J, Liebetrau B, Wiberg S, et al. The Value of the Biomarkers Neuron-Specific Enolase and S100 Calcium-Binding Protein for Prediction of Mortality in Children Resuscitated After Cardiac Arrest. Pediatr Cardiol. 2022; 43(7): 1659–1665.
  9. Hu J, Xie S, Li W, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum S100B in sepsis-associated encephalopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol. 2023; 14: 1102126.
  10. Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019; 13(Suppl 1): S31–S34.
  11. Egi M, Ogura H, Yatabe T, et al. The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020). J Intensive Care. 2021; 9(1): 53.
  12. Godinjak A, Iglica A, Rama A, et al. Predictive value of SAPS II and APACHE II scoring systems for patient outcome in a medical intensive care unit. Acta Med Acad. 2016; 45(2): 97–103.
  13. Cevik AA, Alao DO, Alyafei E, et al. Those who speak survive: the value of the verbal component of GCS in trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023; 49(2): 837–842.
  14. Namiki J, Yamazaki M, Funabiki T, et al. Inaccuracy and misjudged factors of Glasgow Coma Scale scores when assessed by inexperienced physicians. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011; 113(5): 393–398.
  15. Zhang L, Jiang Y, Deng S, et al. S100B/RAGE/Ceramide signaling pathway is involved in sepsis-associated encephalopathy. Life Sci. 2021; 277: 119490.
  16. Nelson MB, Swensen AC, Winden DR, et al. Cardiomyocyte mitochondrial respiration is reduced by receptor for advanced glycation end-product signaling in a ceramide-dependent manner. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015; 309(1): H63–H69.
  17. Mostel Z, Perl A, Marck M, et al. Post-sepsis syndrome - an evolving entity that afflicts survivors of sepsis. Mol Med. 2019; 26(1): 6.
  18. Wu L, Feng Q, Ai ML, et al. The dynamic change of serum S100B levels from day 1 to day 3 is more associated with sepsis-associated encephalopathy. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1): 7718.
  19. Loane DJ, Byrnes KR. Role of microglia in neurotrauma. Neurotherapeutics. 2010; 7(4): 366–377.
  20. van der Slikke EC, An AY, Hancock REW, et al. Exploring the pathophysiology of post-sepsis syndrome to identify therapeutic opportunities. EBioMedicine. 2020; 61: 103044.
  21. Ghori KA, Harmon DC, Elashaal A, et al. Effect of midazolam versus propofol sedation on markers of neurological injury and outcome after isolated severe head injury: a pilot study. Crit Care Resusc. 2007; 9(2): 166–171.
  22. Knapik P, Knapik M, Partyka R, et al. Utility of serum concentration of protein S100 at admission to the medical intensive care unit in prediction of permanent neurological injury. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2016; 13(4): 347–352.
  23. Krzych Ł, Czempik P, Saucha W, et al. Stężenie białka S100B w surowicy krwi dawców narządów po stwierdzonej śmierci mózgu — doniesienie wstępne. Anestezjologia Intensywna Terapia. 2015; 47(4): 320–323.
  24. Anderson RE, Hansson LO, Nilsson O, et al. High serum S100B levels for trauma patients without head injuries. Neurosurgery. 2001; 48(6): 1255–8; discussion 1258.
  25. Wiesmann M, Missler U, Gottmann D, et al. Plasma S-100b protein concentration in healthy adults is age- and sex-independent. Clin Chem. 1998; 44(5): 1056–1058.
  26. Yao Bo, Zhang LN, Ai YH, et al. Serum S100β is a better biomarker than neuron-specific enolase for sepsis-associated encephalopathy and determining its prognosis: a prospective and observational study. Neurochem Res. 2014; 39(7): 1263–1269.
  27. Piazza O, Cotena S, De Robertis E, et al. Sepsis associated encephalopathy studied by MRI and cerebral spinal fluid S100B measurement. Neurochem Res. 2009; 34(7): 1289–1292.
  28. Brola W, Szcześniak M, Wilski M, et al. Sense of happiness in Polish patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2023; 57(6): 484–491.
  29. Jermakow N, Maluchnik M, Sienkiewicz-Jarosz H, et al. Trends of stroke hospitalisation and fatality rates in young vs. elderly people in Poland during 2010-2019 decade. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2022; 56(5): 417–427.