Vol 58, No 1 (2024)
Research Paper
Published online: 2024-01-17

open access

Page views 271
Article views/downloads 258
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Changes in frontal aslant tract tractography in selected types of brain tumours

Sara Kierońska-Siwak1, Magdalena Jabłońska2, Paweł Sokal1
Pubmed: 38230757
Neurol Neurochir Pol 2024;58(1):106-111.

Abstract

Aim of the study. To present differences in frontal aslant tract (FAT) tractography among patients diagnosed with primary brain tumours and metastatic brain tumours.

Material and methods. The analysis included 38 patients diagnosed with a frontal brain tumour. A control group of 30 healthy patients was also considered. The FAT was delineated, taking into account ROI 1 — the superior frontal gyrus, and ROI 2 — SMA. Endpoints were determined on the pars opercularis and pars triangularis of the inferior frontal gyrus. FAT was delineated in four different ways for each patient.

Results. In the group of patients with a brain tumour, a lower volume of FAT and a reduced quantity of fibres were observed compared to the control group. Comparison of the examined parameters between patients with glioblastoma and metastasis revealed statistically significant differences for MD (p < 0.001) regardless of the selected projection.

Conclusions. The difference in MD (mean diffusivity) among patients with metastatic tumours may be related to an increased oedema zone.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Catani M, Dell’Acqua F, Vergani F, et al. Short frontal lobe connections of the human brain. Cortex. 2012; 48(2): 273–291.
  2. Dick AS, Garic D, Graziano P, et al. The frontal aslant tract (FAT) and its role in speech, language and executive function. Cortex. 2019; 111: 148–163.
  3. Aron AR, Behrens TE, Smith S, et al. Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI. J Neurosci. 2007; 27(14): 3743–3752.
  4. La Corte E, Eldahaby D, Greco E, et al. The frontal aslant tract: a systematic review for neurosurgical applications. Front Neurol. 2021; 12: 641586.
  5. Burkhardt E, Kinoshita M, Herbet G. Functional anatomy of the frontal aslant tract and surgical perspectives. J Neurosurg Sci. 2021; 65(6): 566–580.
  6. Szmuda T, Kierońska S, Ali S, et al. Tractography-guided surgery of brain tumours: what is the best method to outline the corticospinal tract? Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2021; 80(1): 40–46.
  7. Kierońska-Siwak S, Sokal P, Jabłońska M, et al. Structural connectivity reorganization based on DTI after cingulotomy in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Brain Sci. 2022; 13(1).
  8. Kierońska S, Sokal P, Dura M, et al. Tractography-Based analysis of morphological and anatomical characteristics of the uncinate fasciculus in human brains. Brain Sci. 2020; 10(10): 709.
  9. Jones DK, Cercignani M. Twenty-five pitfalls in the analysis of diffusion MRI data. NMR Biomed. 2010; 23(7): 803–820.
  10. Farquharson S, Tournier JD, Calamante F, et al. White matter fiber tractography: why we need to move beyond DTI. J Neurosurg. 2013; 118(6): 1367–1377.
  11. Kierońska S, Słoniewski P. The usefulness and limitations of diffusion tensor imaging — a review study. Eur J Transl Clin Med. 2020; 2(2): 43–51.
  12. Dubey A, Kataria R, Sinha VD. Role of diffusion tensor imaging in brain tumor surgery. Asian J Neurosurg. 2018; 13(2): 302–306.
  13. Szmuda T, Kierońska S, Ali S, et al. Tractography-guided surgery of brain tumours: what is the best method to outline the corticospinal tract? Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2021; 80(1): 40–46.
  14. Alexander AL, Hasan KM, Lazar M, et al. Analysis of partial volume effects in diffusion-tensor MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2001; 45(5): 770–780.
  15. Provenzale JM, McGraw P, Mhatre P, et al. Peritumoral brain regions in gliomas and meningiomas: investigation with isotropic diffusion-weighted MR imaging and diffusion-tensor MR imaging. Radiology. 2004; 232(2): 451–460.
  16. Abhinav K, Yeh FC, Pathak S, et al. Advanced diffusion MRI fiber tracking in neurosurgical and neurodegenerative disorders and neuroanatomical studies: a review. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014; 1842(11): 2286–2297.
  17. Jiang R, Du FZ, He Ci, et al. The value of diffusion tensor imaging in differentiating high-grade gliomas from brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014; 9(11): e112550.
  18. Sternberg EJ, Lipton ML, Burns J. Utility of diffusion tensor imaging in evaluation of the peritumoral region in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014; 35(3): 439–444.
  19. Fordham AJ, Hacherl CC, Patel N, et al. Differentiating glioblastomas from solitary brain metastases: an update on the current literature of advanced imaging modalities. Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(12): 2960.
  20. Yeh FC, Irimia A, Bastos DC, et al. Tractography methods and findings in brain tumors and traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage. 2021; 245: 118651.
  21. Byrnes TJD, Barrick TR, Bell BA, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging discriminates between glioblastoma and cerebral metastases in vivo. NMR Biomed. 2011; 24(1): 54–60.
  22. Bauer AH, Erly W, Moser FG, et al. Differentiation of solitary brain metastasis from glioblastoma multiforme: a predictive multiparametric approach using combined MR diffusion and perfusion. Neuroradiology. 2015; 57(7): 697–703.
  23. Bette S, Huber T, Wiestler B, et al. Analysis of fractional anisotropy facilitates differentiation of glioblastoma and brain metastases in a clinical setting. Eur J Radiol. 2016; 85(12): 2182–2187.
  24. Holly KS, Barker BJ, Murcia D, et al. High-grade gliomas exhibit higher peritumoral fractional anisotropy and lower mean diffusivity than intracranial metastases. Front Surg. 2017; 4: 18.
  25. Beaulieu C. The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system — a technical review. NMR Biomed. 2002; 15(7–8): 435–455.
  26. Kinoshita M, Hashimoto N, Goto T, et al. Fractional anisotropy and tumor cell density of the tumor core show positive correlation in diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of malignant brain tumors. Neuroimage. 2008; 43(1): 29–35.
  27. Chen Y, Shi Y, Song Z. Differences in the architecture of low-grade and high-grade gliomas evaluated using fiber density index and fractional anisotropy. J Clin Neurosci. 2010; 17(7): 824–829.
  28. O’Donnell L, Westin CF. An introduction to diffusion tensor image analysis. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2011; 22(2): 185–196.
  29. Wang W, Steward CE, Desmond PM. Diffusion tensor imaging in glioblastoma multiforme and brain metastases: the role of p, q, L, and fractional anisotropy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 30(1): 203–208.
  30. Reiche W, Schuchardt V, Hagen T, et al. Differential diagnosis of intracranial ring enhancing cystic mass lesions--role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI). Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010; 112(3): 218–225.
  31. Tsougos I, Svolos P, Kousi E, et al. Differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme from metastatic brain tumor using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion and perfusion metrics at 3 T. Cancer Imaging. 2012; 12(3): 423–436.
  32. Tsuchiya K, Fujikawa A, Nakajima M, et al. Differentiation between solitary brain metastasis and high-grade glioma by diffusion tensor imaging. Br J Radiol. 2005; 78(930): 533–537.
  33. Jiang R, Du FZ, He Ci, et al. The value of diffusion tensor imaging in differentiating high-grade gliomas from brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014; 9(11): e112550.
  34. Lu S, Ahn D, Johnson G, et al. Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of intracranial neoplasia and associated peritumoral edema: introduction of the tumor infiltration index. Radiology. 2004; 232(1): 221–228.
  35. Lee EJ, Ahn KJ, Lee EK, et al. Potential role of advanced MRI techniques for the peritumoural region in differentiating glioblastoma multiforme and solitary metastatic lesions. Clin Radiol. 2013; 68(12): e689–e697.



Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska