open access

Ahead of print
Research Paper
Submitted: 2023-07-27
Accepted: 2024-01-15
Published online: 2024-02-23
Get Citation

Middle temporal gyrus approach to mesial temporal lobe tumours in children

Paweł Kowalczyk1, Ernest J. Bobeff2, Wojciech Nowak1, Maciej K Ciołkowski13, Marcin Roszkowski1
·
Pubmed: 38393960
Affiliations
  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Dpartment of Sleep Medicine and Metabolic Disorders, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
  3. Department of Descriptive and Clinical Anatomy, Biostructure Centre, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

open access

Ahead of print
Research papers
Submitted: 2023-07-27
Accepted: 2024-01-15
Published online: 2024-02-23

Abstract

Aim of the study. To assess whether the middle temporal gyrus (MTG) approach to mesial temporal lobe (MTL) tumours is an effective procedure for the treatment of epilepsy in children.

Clinical rationale for the study. MTL tumours are a common cause of drug-resistant epilepsy in children. There is as yet no consensus regarding their treatment. One possibility is resection via a MTG approach.

Material and methods. We assessed the medical records of patients treated at the Department of Neurosurgery, Children’s Memorial Health Institute,Warsaw, Poland between 2002 and 2020. A prospectively maintained database including clinical, laboratory, and radiographic presentation, as well as pre- and post-operative course, was analysed. Patients with at least a one- -year follow-up were included.

Results. There were 14 patients aged 4–18 years who underwent a MTG approach for a MTL tumour. All presented with epileptic seizure, and none had neurological deficit on admission to hospital. Median follow-up was 2.5 years. Neuronavigation was used to adjust the approach, localise the temporal horn, and achieve radical resection of the tumour and the hippocampus. Gross total resection was performed in all cases. In most patients, histopathological examination revealed ganglioglioma. One patient had transient aphasia. Two patients developed hemiparesis after surgery, which later improved. One of them also experienced visual disturbances. Acute complications were more frequent in younger patients (p = 0.024). In all cases, MRI confirmed complete resection and there was no tumour recurrence during the follow-up period. 13/14 patients remained seizure-free (Engel class I).

Conclusions and clinical implications. The MTG approach to MTL tumours is an effective procedure for the treatment of epilepsy in children. It avoids removal of the lateral temporal lobe and poses only a minor risk of permanent neurological complications.

Abstract

Aim of the study. To assess whether the middle temporal gyrus (MTG) approach to mesial temporal lobe (MTL) tumours is an effective procedure for the treatment of epilepsy in children.

Clinical rationale for the study. MTL tumours are a common cause of drug-resistant epilepsy in children. There is as yet no consensus regarding their treatment. One possibility is resection via a MTG approach.

Material and methods. We assessed the medical records of patients treated at the Department of Neurosurgery, Children’s Memorial Health Institute,Warsaw, Poland between 2002 and 2020. A prospectively maintained database including clinical, laboratory, and radiographic presentation, as well as pre- and post-operative course, was analysed. Patients with at least a one- -year follow-up were included.

Results. There were 14 patients aged 4–18 years who underwent a MTG approach for a MTL tumour. All presented with epileptic seizure, and none had neurological deficit on admission to hospital. Median follow-up was 2.5 years. Neuronavigation was used to adjust the approach, localise the temporal horn, and achieve radical resection of the tumour and the hippocampus. Gross total resection was performed in all cases. In most patients, histopathological examination revealed ganglioglioma. One patient had transient aphasia. Two patients developed hemiparesis after surgery, which later improved. One of them also experienced visual disturbances. Acute complications were more frequent in younger patients (p = 0.024). In all cases, MRI confirmed complete resection and there was no tumour recurrence during the follow-up period. 13/14 patients remained seizure-free (Engel class I).

Conclusions and clinical implications. The MTG approach to MTL tumours is an effective procedure for the treatment of epilepsy in children. It avoids removal of the lateral temporal lobe and poses only a minor risk of permanent neurological complications.

Get Citation

Keywords

middle temporal gyrus, mesial temporal lobe, epilepsy surgery, seizure-free outcome, children

About this article
Title

Middle temporal gyrus approach to mesial temporal lobe tumours in children

Journal

Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska

Issue

Ahead of print

Article type

Research Paper

Published online

2024-02-23

Page views

185

Article views/downloads

134

DOI

10.5603/pjnns.96409

Pubmed

38393960

Keywords

middle temporal gyrus
mesial temporal lobe
epilepsy surgery
seizure-free outcome
children

Authors

Paweł Kowalczyk
Ernest J. Bobeff
Wojciech Nowak
Maciej K Ciołkowski
Marcin Roszkowski

References (38)
  1. Blümcke I. Neuropathology of focal epilepsies: a critical review. Epilepsy Behav. 2009; 15(1): 34–39.
  2. Clusmann H, Schramm J, Kral T, et al. Prognostic factors and outcome after different types of resection for temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurosurg. 2002; 97(5): 1131–1141.
  3. Clusmann H, Kral T, Gleissner U, et al. Analysis of different types of resection for pediatric patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurosurgery. 2004; 54(4): 847–59; discussion 859.
  4. Bourgeois M, Sainte-Rose C, Lellouch-Tubiana A, et al. Surgery of epilepsy associated with focal lesions in childhood. J Neurosurg. 1999; 90(5): 833–842.
  5. Vasconcellos E, Wyllie E, Sullivan S, et al. Mental retardation in pediatric candidates for epilepsy surgery: the role of early seizure onset. Epilepsia. 2001; 42(2): 268–274.
  6. Penfield W, Baldwin M. Temporal lobe seizures and the technic of subtotal temporal lobectomy. Ann Surg. 1952; 136(4): 625–634.
  7. Wieser HG, Yaşargil MG. Selective amygdalohippocampectomy as a surgical treatment of mesiobasal limbic epilepsy. Surg Neurol. 1982; 17(6): 445–457.
  8. Niemeyer P. The transventricular amygdala-hiocampectomy in temporal lobe epilepsy. In: Baldwin M, Bailey P. ed. Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield 1958: 461–482.
  9. Schramm J, Aliashkevich AF. Surgery for temporal mediobasal tumors: experience based on a series of 235 patients. Neurosurgery. 2008; 62(6 Suppl 3): 1272–1282.
  10. Schramm J, Aliashkevich AF. Temporal mediobasal tumors: a proposal for classification according to surgical anatomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008; 150(9): 857–864; discussion 864.
  11. Babini M, Giulioni M, Galassi E, et al. Seizure outcome of surgical treatment of focal epilepsy associated with low-grade tumors in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013; 11(2): 214–223.
  12. Daszkiewicz P, Kowalczyk P, Roszkowski M. Surgical treatment of neuronal-glial tumors of mesial-basal part of temporal lobe: Long term outcome and control of epilepsy in pediatric patients. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2018; 52(1): 2–8.
  13. Engel JJr, van Ness P, Rasmussen T. Outcome with respect to epileptic seizures. In: Engel JJr. ed. Surgical treatment of the epilepsies, Raven Press, New York 1993: 609–621.
  14. Holmes GL. The long-term effects of seizures on the developing brain: clinical and laboratory issues. Brain Dev. 1991; 13(6): 393–409.
  15. Wiebe S, Blume WT, Girvin JP, et al. Effectiveness and Efficiency of Surgery for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Study Group. A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345(5): 311–318.
  16. Engel J, Wiebe S, French J, et al. Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, American Epilepsy Society, American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Practice parameter: temporal lobe and localized neocortical resections for epilepsy: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, in association with the American Epilepsy Society and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Neurology. 2003; 60(4): 538–547.
  17. Uliel-Sibony S, Kramer U, Fried I, et al. Pediatric temporal low-grade glial tumors: epilepsy outcome following resection in 48 children. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011; 27(9): 1413–1418.
  18. Jones-Gotman M, Zatorre RJ, Olivier A, et al. Learning and retention of words and designs following excision from medial or lateral temporal-lobe structures. Neuropsychologia. 1997; 35(7): 963–973.
  19. Jutila L, Immonen A, Mervaala E, et al. Long term outcome of temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: analyses of 140 consecutive patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002; 73(5): 486–494.
  20. Smith JS, Chang EF, Lamborn KR, et al. Role of extent of resection in the long-term outcome of low-grade hemispheric gliomas. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(8): 1338–1345.
  21. Maton B, Jayakar P, Resnick T, et al. Surgery for medically intractable temporal lobe epilepsy during early life. Epilepsia. 2008; 49(1): 80–87.
  22. Mittal S, Montes JL, Farmer JP, et al. Long-term outcome after surgical treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy in children. J Neurosurg. 2005; 103(5 Suppl): 401–412.
  23. Holmes G. Epilepsy surgery in children: when, why, and how. Neurology. 2002; 58(12 Suppl 7): S13–S20.
  24. Pilcher WH, Rusyniak WG. Complications of epilepsy surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1993; 4(2): 311–325.
  25. Ogiwara H, Nordli DR, DiPatri AJ, et al. Pediatric epileptogenic gangliogliomas: seizure outcome and surgical results. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010; 5(3): 271–276.
  26. Khajavi K, Comair YG, Wyllie E, et al. Surgical management of pediatric tumor-associated epilepsy. J Child Neurol. 1999; 14(1): 15–25.
  27. Englot DJ, Han SJ, Berger MS, et al. Extent of surgical resection predicts seizure freedom in low-grade temporal lobe brain tumors. Neurosurgery. 2012; 70(4): 921–8; discussion 928.
  28. Fish DR, Spencer SS. Clinical correlations: MRI and EEG. Magn Reson Imaging. 1995; 13(8): 1113–1117.
  29. Cataltepe O, Turanli G, Yalnizoglu D, et al. Surgical management of temporal lobe tumor-related epilepsy in children. J Neurosurg. 2005; 102(3 Suppl): 280–287.
  30. Luyken C, Blümcke I, Fimmers R, et al. The spectrum of long-term epilepsy-associated tumors: long-term seizure and tumor outcome and neurosurgical aspects. Epilepsia. 2003; 44(6): 822–830.
  31. Yaşargil MG, Reeves JD. Tumours of the limbic and paralimbic system. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1992; 116(2-4): 147–149.
  32. Schramm J, Kral T, Grunwald T, et al. Surgical treatment for neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy: clinical and surgical aspects and seizure outcome. J Neurosurg. 2001; 94(1): 33–42.
  33. Lee JiY, Phi JiH, Wang KC, et al. Transsylvian-transcisternal selective lesionectomy for pediatric lesional mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurosurgery. 2011; 68(3): 582–587.
  34. Giulioni M, Rubboli G, Marucci G, et al. Seizure outcome of epilepsy surgery in focal epilepsies associated with temporomesial glioneuronal tumors: lesionectomy compared with tailored resection. J Neurosurg. 2009; 111(6): 1275–1282.
  35. Morris HH, Matkovic Z, Estes ML, et al. Ganglioglioma and intractable epilepsy: clinical and neurophysiologic features and predictors of outcome after surgery. Epilepsia. 1998; 39(3): 307–313.
  36. Fomekong E, Baylac F, Moret C, et al. Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors. Analysis of 16 cases. Neurochirurgie. 1999; 45(3): 180–189.
  37. Jooma R, Yeh HS, Privitera MD, et al. Lesionectomy versus electrophysiologically guided resection for temporal lobe tumors manifesting with complex partial seizures. J Neurosurg. 1995; 83(2): 231–236.
  38. Mohamed A, Wyllie E, Ruggieri P, et al. Temporal lobe epilepsy due to hippocampal sclerosis in pediatric candidates for epilepsy surgery. Neurology. 2001; 56(12): 1643–1649.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl