Vol 53, No 1 (2019)
Research Paper
Published online: 2019-01-04

open access

Page views 3667
Article views/downloads 2151
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

No association between MRI changes in the lumbar spine and intensity of pain, quality of life, depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with low back pain

Anna Babińska1, Wojciech Wawrzynek1, Elżbieta Czech2, Jarosław Skupiński1, Jarosław Szczygieł3, Beata Łabuz-Roszak4
Pubmed: 30614517
Neurol Neurochir Pol 2019;53(1):74-82.

Abstract

Introduction. The association between changes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical symptoms in patients with low back pain (LBP) is unclear.

Aim. To evaluate correlations between combined MRI findings of the lumbar spine (LS) and pain intensity, depressive and anxiety symptoms and quality of life in patients with LBP.

Material and methods. 200 subjects (93 men and 107 women; mean age 51.42 ± 13.21 years) with LBP referred for MRI were enrolled in the study. All patients completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Quality of Life Scales (EQ-5D, EQ-VAS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). MRI scans were assessed according to a scoring system prepared by the authors, and the total MRI score was calculated.

Results. The mean total MRI score was 11.59 ± 6.73 points (range 0–50 points) and was higher in men than in women (p = 0.015). A correlation was observed between total MRI score and age (p < 0.001) and between total MRI score and BMI (p = 0.005). An association was found between total MRI score and EQ-5D (p = 0.012) and HADS-D results (p = 0.003). VAS and HADS-A results did not correlate with MRI score. When multivariate analysis was done, the total MRI score was only significantly related to age and BMI, and association between the total MRI score and EQ-5D or HADS-D results was not confirmed. Decreased quality of life was associated with increased intensity of pain and depressive and anxiety symptoms.

Conclusions. Combined MRI changes in LS do not correlate with pain intensity, depressive and anxiety syndromes or quality of life in patients with LBP.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J. 2008; 8(1): 8–20.
  2. Pakpour AH, Nikoobakht M, Campbell P. Association of pain and depression in those with chronic low back pain: the mediation effect of patient sexual functioning. Clin J Pain. 2015; 31(1): 44–51.
  3. Bahouq H, Allali F, Rkain H, et al. Discussing sexual concerns with chronic low back pain patients: barriers and patients' expectations. Clin Rheumatol. 2013; 32(10): 1487–1492.
  4. Beattie PF, Meyers SP, Stratford P, et al. Associations between patient report of symptoms and anatomic impairment visible on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(7): 819–828.
  5. Jarvik JG, Hollingworth W, Heagerty PJ, et al. Three-year incidence of low back pain in an initially asymptomatic cohort: clinical and imaging risk factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(13): 1541–8; discussion 1549.
  6. Chung CB, Vande Berg BC, Tavernier T, et al. End plate marrow changes in the asymptomatic lumbosacral spine: frequency, distribution and correlation with age and degenerative changes. Skeletal Radiol. 2004; 33(7): 399–404.
  7. Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, et al. MR imaging of the lumbar spine: prevalence of intervertebral disk extrusion and sequestration, nerve root compression, end plate abnormalities, and osteoarthritis of the facet joints in asymptomatic volunteers. Radiology. 1998; 209(3): 661–666.
  8. Jensen OK, Nielsen CV, Sørensen JS, et al. Back pain was less explained than leg pain: a cross-sectional study using magnetic resonance imaging in low back pain patients with and without radiculopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 16: 374.
  9. Endean A, Palmer KT, Coggon D. Potential of magnetic resonance imaging findings to refine case definition for mechanical low back pain in epidemiological studies: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(2): 160–169.
  10. Chou D, Samartzis D, Bellabarba C, et al. Degenerative magnetic resonance imaging changes in patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(21 Suppl): S43–S53.
  11. Arana E, Martí-Bonmatí L, Vega M, et al. Relationship between low back pain, disability, MR imaging findings and health care provider. Skeletal Radiol. 2006; 35(9): 641–647.
  12. Berg L, Hellum C, Gjertsen Ø, et al. Norwegian Spine Study Group. Do more MRI findings imply worse disability or more intense low back pain? A cross-sectional study of candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis. Skeletal Radiol. 2013; 42(11): 1593–1602.
  13. Mariconda M, Galasso O, Imbimbo L, et al. Relationship between alterations of the lumbar spine, visualized with magnetic resonance imaging, and occupational variables. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(2): 255–266.
  14. Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health. 1990; 13(4): 227–236.
  15. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1983; 67(6): 361–370.
  16. Sobczyk W, Gugała M, Rola R. Rozwój badań nad jakością życia w chorobach przewlekłych. Post Psychiatr Neurol. 2008; 17(4): 353–356.
  17. Fardon DF, Milette PC. Combined Task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the Combined task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(5): E93–E9E113.
  18. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(17): 1873–1878.
  19. Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, et al. Imaging of degenerative disk disease. Radiology. 1988; 168(1): 177–186.
  20. Rahme R, Moussa R. The modic vertebral endplate and marrow changes: pathologic significance and relation to low back pain and segmental instability of the lumbar spine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008; 29(5): 838–842.
  21. Albert HB, Manniche C. Modic changes following lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(7): 977–982.
  22. Kuisma M, Karppinen J, Niinimäki J, et al. Modic changes in endplates of lumbar vertebral bodies: prevalence and association with low back and sciatic pain among middle-aged male workers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(10): 1116–1122.
  23. Hancock M, Maher C, Macaskill P, et al. MRI findings are more common in selected patients with acute low back pain than controls? European Spine Journal. 2011; 21(2): 240–246.
  24. Heuck A, Glaser C. Basic aspects in MR imaging of degenerative lumbar disk disease. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2014; 18(3): 228–239.
  25. Waldt S, Gersing A, Brügel M. Measurements and classifications in spine imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2014; 18(3): 219–227.
  26. Liuke M, Solovieva S, Lamminen A, et al. Disc degeneration of the lumbar spine in relation to overweight. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005; 29(8): 903–908.
  27. Hollingworth W, Dixon AK, Todd CJ, et al. Self reported health status and magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J. 1998; 7(5): 369–375.
  28. Chou R, Fu R, Carrino JA, et al. Imaging strategies for low-back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009; 373(9662): 463–472.
  29. Webster BS, Bauer AZ, Choi Y, et al. Iatrogenic consequences of early magnetic resonance imaging in acute, work-related, disabling low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38(22): 1939–1946.