open access

Vol 48, No 2 (2014)
Original research articles
Submitted: 2014-03-03
Get Citation

Clipping versus coiling for intracranial aneurysms

Marcin Birski, Cezary Wałęsa, Witold Gaca, Dariusz Paczkowski, Julita Birska, Aleksandra Harat
DOI: 10.1016/j.pjnns.2014.03.002
·
Neurol Neurochir Pol 2014;48(2):122-129.

open access

Vol 48, No 2 (2014)
Original research articles
Submitted: 2014-03-03

Abstract

Background and purpose

The aim of this study was to compare results of clipping and coiling for aneurysms of the anterior circle of Willis. Previous studies have not identified a clear superiority of one method over the other.

Material and methods

The study group included 165 consecutive patients. The assessment took into account the risk of death, neurological status according to the scale of the GOS and mRS, the incidence of early complications and quality of life measured by own surveys and questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 v. 3.0.

Results

Mean follow-up was more than four years. Early and late results of treatment after embolization and clipping for all patients did not differ. Evaluation of patients with bleeding aneurysms demonstrated better outcomes after embolization, however statistical significance was observed only in terms of symptomatic scale score of QLQ-C30 questionnaire (p=0.02). For patients with non-bleeding aneurysms better outcomes were obtained after clipping, but statistical significance was found only in the early results: more excellent results in GOS score at discharge (p<0.03) and fewer complications during hospitalization (p=0.02).

Conclusions

Results of treatment after clipping and coiling do not differ in total for all patients, but differ depending on the presence of bleeding. Patients with bleeding aneurysms achieve better outcomes after coiling, and patients with non-bleeding aneurysms achieve better outcomes after clipping.

Abstract

Background and purpose

The aim of this study was to compare results of clipping and coiling for aneurysms of the anterior circle of Willis. Previous studies have not identified a clear superiority of one method over the other.

Material and methods

The study group included 165 consecutive patients. The assessment took into account the risk of death, neurological status according to the scale of the GOS and mRS, the incidence of early complications and quality of life measured by own surveys and questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 v. 3.0.

Results

Mean follow-up was more than four years. Early and late results of treatment after embolization and clipping for all patients did not differ. Evaluation of patients with bleeding aneurysms demonstrated better outcomes after embolization, however statistical significance was observed only in terms of symptomatic scale score of QLQ-C30 questionnaire (p=0.02). For patients with non-bleeding aneurysms better outcomes were obtained after clipping, but statistical significance was found only in the early results: more excellent results in GOS score at discharge (p<0.03) and fewer complications during hospitalization (p=0.02).

Conclusions

Results of treatment after clipping and coiling do not differ in total for all patients, but differ depending on the presence of bleeding. Patients with bleeding aneurysms achieve better outcomes after coiling, and patients with non-bleeding aneurysms achieve better outcomes after clipping.

Get Citation

Keywords

Intracranial aneurysm, Subarachnoid haemorrhage, Outcome

About this article
Title

Clipping versus coiling for intracranial aneurysms

Journal

Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska

Issue

Vol 48, No 2 (2014)

Pages

122-129

DOI

10.1016/j.pjnns.2014.03.002

Bibliographic record

Neurol Neurochir Pol 2014;48(2):122-129.

Keywords

Intracranial aneurysm
Subarachnoid haemorrhage
Outcome

Authors

Marcin Birski
Cezary Wałęsa
Witold Gaca
Dariusz Paczkowski
Julita Birska
Aleksandra Harat

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl