Vol 80, No 6 (2022)
Clinical vignette
Published online: 2022-04-29

open access

Page views 4457
Article views/downloads 517
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Permanent cardiac arrest in a patient with a left ventricular assist device support

Katarzyna Ratman1, Agnieszka Biełka1, Mariusz E Kalinowski1, Mirosława M Herdyńska-Wąs1, Piotr Przybyłowski2, Michał O Zembala34
Pubmed: 35485904
Kardiol Pol 2022;80(6):709-710.

Abstract

Not available

„ Clinical vignette

Permanent cardiac arrest in a patient with a left ventricular assist device support

Katarzyna Ratman1Agnieszka Biełka1Mariusz E Kalinowski1Mirosława M Herdyńska-Wąs1Piotr Przybyłowski2Michał O Zembala34
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Silesian Center For Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland
2Department of Cardiac, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and Transplantology in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases in Zabrze, Poland
3Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart and Lung Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Silesian Center For Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland
4Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland

Correspondence to:

Katarzyna Ratman, MD, PhD,

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Silesian Center For Heart Diseases,

M Sklodowskiej-Curie 9, 41–800 Zabrze, Poland,

phone: +48 323 733 857,

e-mail: ratmankatarzyna@gmail.com

Copyright by the Author(s), 2022

DOI: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0115

Received: February 7, 2022

Accepted: April 27, 2022

Early publication date:

April 29, 2022

The left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support significantly reduces mortality in end-stage heart failure patients and potentially restores eligibility for heart transplantation in patients with initially significant pulmonary hypertension [1, 2]. Ventricular fibrillation and asystole lead to a decrease in right ventricular output and left ventricular preload, which significantly diminishes efficiency of LVAD support [3–5]. In this clinical vignette, we present a patient with an implanted continuous-flow LVAD (CF-LVAD) who developed permanent asystole as a consequence of an electric storm.

A 38-year-old male patient with an end-stage heart failure due to non-ischemic, post-inflammatory cardiomyopathy, qualified for heart transplantation in February 2018 and then implanted with a CF-LVAD HeartMate 3 (HM3, Abbott Inc, Chicago, IL, US) in May 2018 as a bridge-to-transplant due to recurrent episodes of circulatory decompensations, was referred to our institution in February 2019 with P-wave asystole (Figure 1B). In February 2014, the patient was implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. On admission, the patient was conscious and presented low blood pressure (mean arterial pressure [MAP], 53 mm Hg) and diminished pump flow of 2.4 l/min, which was accompanied by low-flow LVAD alarms. Other pump parameters, such as power consumption, speed, and pulsati­lity index (PI) were within the normal range (3.7 Watt, 5500 rpm, 3.0 PI, respectively). An echocardiography revealed an image of akinetic myocardium of both ventricles filled with enhanced echo­genic blood (four-chamber view measurements: right ventricle 50 mm, left ventricle 60 mm, intraventricular septum in the middle position) with permanently closed aortic valve and constantly opened tricuspid and mitral valve. On CRT-D interrogation we found numerous, adequate high voltage interventions for a ventricular storm (Supplementary material, Figure S1) a day before admission and subsequent permanent asystole. Laboratory tests showed features of severe multiorgan failure (Supplementary material, Table S1). Intravenous fluid therapy under strict control of the fluid balance allowed for a rapid improvement of pump flow and achievement of satisfactory MAP (7080 mm Hg) while systemic heparinization with unfractionated heparin prevented pump thrombosis. The patient remained conscious and hemodynamically stable with gradual end-organ function improvement. He was consulted by a psychiatrist due to the results of laboratory tests that revealed the presence of metabolites of psychoactive substances. The consultant emphasized the elevated risk of noncompliance but did not state absolute contraindications to orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) and after several psychotherapy sessions, the patient declared full commitment to abstinence and further good compliance. Due to the estimated high risk of hemodynamic deterioration, the patient was listed for an urgent OHT, which was performed 11 days later. Pathomorphological examination of the patient’s native heart revealed numerous foci of necrosis. The post-transplantation short- and long-term course was uneventful. The patient was treated according to the routine immunosuppressive protocol and presented stable levels of immunosuppressive drugs. All the follow-up echocardiographic examinations showed normal graft function, and there were no significant cellular and humoral rejections in the consecutive protocol biopsies. A chest X-ray and electrocardiogram before and after OHT are presented in Figure 1. He stayed in good condition and did not present any signs of drug and alcohol abuse at check-up visits. Unfortunately, he died due to a post-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage 27 months after OHT.

5219.png
Figure 1. Chest X-ray and ECG before and after OHT
Abbreviations: CRT-D, cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator; ECG, electrocardiogram; OHT, orthotopic heart transplantation; LVAD, left ventricular assist device
Article information

Acknowledgments: KR, AB, and MK would like to thank Professor Marian Zembala for the invitation and encouragement to participate in the development of the LVAD program. This publication is part of the RH ROT project conducted in our institution (STRATEGMED2/266798/15/NCBR/2015).

Conflict of interest: MOZ is a consultant for Abbott Inc and Boston Scientific. Other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding: None declared.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at kardiologiapolska@ptkardio.pl.

REFERENCES

  1. Mehra MR, Naka Y, Uriel N, et al. MOMENTUM 3 Investigators. A fully magnetically levitated circulatory pump for advanced heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(5): 440450, doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610426, indexed in Pubmed: 27959709.
  2. Biełka A, Kalinowski M, Hawranek M, et al. Mechanical circulatory support restores eligibility for heart transplant in patients with significant pulmonary hypertension. Kardiol Pol. 2020; 78(10): 10081014, doi: 10.33963/KP.15518, indexed in Pubmed: 32692025.
  3. Rehorn MR, Black-Maier E, Loungani R, et al. Electrical storm in patients with left ventricular assist devices: Risk factors, incidence, and impact on survival. Heart Rhythm. 2021; 18(8): 12631271, doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.03.047, indexed in Pubmed: 33839327.
  4. Takayama H, Aldea GS, Verrier ED, et al. Successful management of asystole with an isolated left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006; 25(4): 490492, doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.11.441, indexed in Pubmed: 16563986.
  5. Javed W, Chaggar PS, Venkateswaran R, et al. Prolonged asystole in a patient with an isolated left ventricular assist device. Future Cardiol. 2016; 12(5): 533538, doi: 10.2217/fca-2016-0022, indexed in Pubmed: 27539188.



Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska)