Vol 81, No 4 (2023)
Clinical vignette
Published online: 2023-03-05

open access

Page views 2026
Article views/downloads 346
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Catheter ablation of persistent ventricular tachycardia in a patient with a left ventricular assist device: Electrophysiological challenge

Grzegorz Karkowski12, Marcin Kuniewicz123, Marta Kacprzyk1, Tomasz Chyży1, Karol Wierzbicki4, Jacek Lelakowski1
Pubmed: 36871307
Kardiol Pol 2023;81(4):421-422.

Abstract

Not available

Clinical vignette

Catheter ablation of persistent ventricular tachycardia in a patient with a left ventricular assist device: Electrophysiological challenge

Grzegorz Karkowski13Marcin Kuniewicz1–3Marta Kacprzyk1Tomasz Chyży1Karol Wierzbicki4Jacek Lelakowski1
1Department of Electrocardiology, John Paul II Hospital, Kraków, Poland
2Department of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
3Clinical Department of Interventional Cardiology, The John Paul II Hospital, Kraków, Poland
4Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Cardiology, Kraków, Poland

Correspondence to:

Marcin Kuniewicz, MD,

Department of Electrocardiology,

John Paul II Hospital,

Prądnicka 80, 31–202 Kraków, Poland,

phone: +48 12 614 22 77,

e-mail: kuniewiczm@gmail.com

Copyright by the Author(s), 2023

DOI: 10.33963/KP.a2023.0062

Received: December 14, 2022

Accepted: February 21, 2023

Early publication date: March 5, 2023

A 67-year-old male patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implanted (ICD) in secondary prevention after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) HeartMate3 (Abbott Labs, Chicago, IL, US) implantation a year earlier was admitted for persistent ventricular tachycardia 150/min lasting about three weeks. Telemetry control of the ICD showed similar ventricular tachycardia (VT) episodes for a few months before admission with different duration and unsuccessful anti-tachycardia pacing. Pharmacotherapy based on amiodarone was unsuccessful, and all reversible causes of arrhythmia were excluded. Electrical cardioversion terminated VT only for a few hours. The patient was entirely dependent on the LVAD with the closed and fibrotic aortic valve. Despite suitable left ventricular (LV) hemodynamic tolerance of VT, the patient started to develop right ventricular (RV) failure, with mainly gastric problems and abdominal and limb edemas with significantly elevated liver enzymes. Pre-procedural computed tomography (CT) scans located the inflow cannula in the LV (Figure 1A). A significant reduction of impeller speed or switching off the device were impossible. Catheter ablation was performed using the CARTO electro-anatomical system (Biosense Webster Inc., CA, US) under general sedation with a transseptal approach.

After entering the LV, the position of the inflow cannula was marked on the CARTO map under fluoroscopic control, and then the activation and voltage mapping (0.101.0 mV) was performed (Figure 1 BD). The magnetic field generated by the LVAD created slight artifacts on surface ECG, mostly corrected with EP system (Lab-system Pro, Boston Scientific) without impairing the mapping process. Intracardiac signals were not interrupted. Mapping showed extensive low-voltage areas and macro-reentry VT. Entrainment mapping confirmed the location of the VT critical isthmus on the apical-lateral wall, and VT terminated a few seconds after the radiofrequency (RF) application (40 W; 15 ml/min) started (Figure 1E, Supplementary material, Figure S1A, B). The control ventricular stimulation program did not induce VT. Due to extensive LV fibrosis and non-inducibility, the procedure was finished. In 3-month follow-up, VT did not recur.

Figure 1. A. Pre-procedural CT scans of the heart with precise localization of the LVAD inflow cannula in the LV. B. Fluoroscopy view of the LVAD and an ablation catheter from RF ablation spot (*), AP view. C. Activation map of the LV (LAO modified projection) during VT (CARTO, Biosense Webster Inc., CA, US) performed with the SmartTouch™ ablation catheter and automatic points acquisition (total points acquired:1445). The inflow cannula was marked and cut from the LV FAM (**). The map showed macro-reentrant VT with a critical isthmus located in the lateral-apical segment of the LV (*). D. Voltage bipolar (0.11.0 mV) map (LAO modified projection) of the LV shows extensive scarring. E. Entrainment pacing from the VT critical isthmus. VT with CL 448 ms is entrained by pacing with CL 420 ms with concealed fusion, PPI-VT CL =18 ms, S-QRS = EGMQRS. VT terminated after 7 seconds after RF application at this spot. Surface ECG shows slight magnetic artifacts
Abbreviations: CL, cycle length; CT, computer tomography; FAM, fast anatomical map; ECG, electrocardiography; EGM, electrogram; LV, left ventricular; LAO, left anterior oblique; VT, ventricular tachycardia; LVAD, left ventricular assist device; PPI, post pacing interval; RF, radiofrequency

Ventricular arrhythmias are the most significant cause of mortality in patients after LVAD implantation [1]. Indication for catheter ablation exists in the case of incessant VT, recurrent ICD interventions, or progressive RV failure [2].

Electromagnetic interference caused by fully magnetic LVAD can be a significant issue during map acquisition, as systems rely on the magnetic field to create 3D maps [3]. In the presented case, intracardiac signals and the mapping process were uninterrupted. Moreover, the risk of impeller damage by catheters should be taken into consideration. The anatomy of the LV, changed by the apical position of the device and the suction force of the inflow cannula, is a significant risk factor for this complication. Pre-procedural CT scans with precise localization of the cannula or intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) used during the procedure may help to avoid such a problem. However, this complication has not yet been reported in the literature [4].

Ablation of VTs in patients with LVADs should be considered if there are indications for the procedure because acute procedural success, complications, and recurrences are comparable to the non-LVAD-related VT population [5].

Article information

Acknowledgments: Special appreciation to Biosense Webster technical support provided by Marta Baranska.

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Funding: None.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, which allows downloading and sharing articles with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at kardiologiapolska@ptkardio.pl.

REFERENCES

  1. Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Kormos RL, et al. Second INTERMACS annual report: more than 1,000 primary left ventricular assist device implants. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010; 29(1): 110, doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.10.009, indexed in Pubmed: 20123242.
  2. Garan AR, Iyer V, Whang W, et al. Catheter ablation for ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. ASAIO J. 2014; 60(3): 311316, doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000061, indexed in Pubmed: 24614361.
  3. Ratman K, Biełka A, Kalinowski ME, et al. Permanent cardiac arrest in a patient with a left ventricular assist device support. Kardiol Pol. 2022; 80(6): 709710, doi: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0115, indexed in Pubmed: 35485904.
  4. Sisti N, Santoro A, Carreras G, et al. Ablation therapy for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with LVAD: Multiple faces of an electrophysiological challenge. J Arrhythm. 2021; 37(3): 535543, doi: 10.1002/joa3.12542, indexed in Pubmed: 34141004.
  5. Anderson RD, Lee G, Virk S, et al. Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with a ventricular assist device: a systematic review of procedural characteristics and outcomes. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019; 5(1): 3951, doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.08.009, indexed in Pubmed: 30678785.



Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska)