English Polski
Tom 11, Nr 4 (2018)
Praca badawcza (oryginalna)
Opublikowany online: 2019-03-12

dostęp otwarty

Wyświetlenia strony 405
Wyświetlenia/pobrania artykułu 657
Pobierz cytowanie

Eksport do Mediów Społecznościowych

Eksport do Mediów Społecznościowych

Response Rate of Sero-reactive Blood Donors to Notification and Counselling

Manish Raturi1, Shamee Shastry1, Pruthvi Raj1
Journal of Transfusion Medicine 2018;11(4):144-150.

Streszczenie

Background. Sero-reactivity disclosure to blood donors is an important issue of public domain. The sensitivity of situation demands both confidential as well as trust laden atmosphere while notifying them. Our aim was to assess and analyze the response rate of sero-reactive donors towards post-donation notification and counselling.
Material and methods. Donors reactive for any transfusion transmitted infections were notified of their results and called to blood bank for counseling (January 2016 to December 2017). The notification process included one postal and two telephonic communications. Their privacy was maintained throughout the whole process. Responders were counseled by the medical officer and subsequently referred to the concerned specialty for further management.
Results. Among 30,343 voluntary blood donors (96% males) 65.2% (n = 19 784) were repeat donors. Total 0.42% (n = 129) cases with reactive screening test results (0.30% HBV; 0.06% HIV; 0.006% HCV; 0.04% syphilis and 0.006% malaria) were evaluated. Prevalence of HBV and HIV were higher among first time donors (0.61% and 0.12%) than in repeat donors (0.14% and 0.02%) respectively (p = 0.002). Overall 58% (n = 75/129) donors responded to notification and counseling. Response among repeat donors (67.5% [n = 27/40]) versus first time donors (54.0% [n = 48/89]) was better and statistically significant (p = 0.05). The response rate for Malaria, HIV, Syphilis, HBV and HCV was 100%, 78%, 77%, 51% and 50%, respectively. Inaccurate donor demographics (wrong address and phone number) resulted in our inability to notify 11.6% (n = 15) cases. Major factors hindering the response rate were donors’ inability to be present for a post-test discussion either due to far distance (> 100 miles) and/or their busy schedule.
Conclusion. Good response was noted among repeat blood donors. Donor education and repeated attempts to communicate with the sero-reactive donors would improve the response rate.

Artykuł dostępny w formacie PDF

Pokaż PDF (angielski) Pobierz plik PDF

Referencje

  1. Guidelines for Blood Donor Selection and Blood Donor Referrals. Available from: http://naco.gov.in/blood-transfusion-services-publications [Last accessed on 2018 Oct 29].
  2. National Blood Policy [2014]. Available from: http://naco.gov.in/blood-transfusion-services-publications [Last accessed on 2018 Oct 29].
  3. DONTULA S, MATHUR A, KAMALADOSS T, et al. Donor disclosure - a donor's right and blood bank's responsibility. Transfusion Alternatives in Transfusion Medicine. 2012; 12(3-4): 44–50.
  4. Saran RK. Blood Transfusion Safety and Regulatory Requirements. In: Transfusion medicine technical manual DGHS. 2nd ed. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2003. p. : 383–416.
  5. Pallavi P, Ganesh CK, Jayashree K, et al. Seroprevalence and trends in transfusion transmitted infections among blood donors in a university hospital blood bank: a 5 year study. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2011; 27(1): 1–6.
  6. D P. Patel, D. S. Patel, D. J. Bhatt, D. N. Bhatnagar, and D.M.G. Shah, “Evaluation of Response to Donor Notification of Reactive Transfusion Transmitted Infections (TTIs) Result,” Natl J Integr Res Med. 2012; 3(2): 20–25.
  7. Agarwal N. Response rate of blood donors in the Uttarakhand region of India after notification of reactive test results on their blood samples. Blood Transfus. 2014; 12 Suppl 1: s51–s53.
  8. Roshan TM, Rosline H, Ahmed SA, et al. Response rate of Malaysian blood donors with reactive screening test to transfusion medicine unit calls. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2009; 40(6): 1315–1321.
  9. Sharma UK, Schreiber GB, Glynn SA, et al. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study. Knowledge of HIV/AIDS transmission and screening in United States blood donors. Transfusion. 2001; 41(11): 1341–1350.
  10. Kotwal U, Doda V, Arora S, et al. Blood donor notification and counseling: Our experience from a tertiary care hospital in India. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2015; 9(1): 18–22.
  11. Moyer LA, Shapiro CN, Shulman G, et al. A survey of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive blood donors: degree of understanding and action taken after notification. Transfusion. 1992; 32(8): 702–706.