Multimedialna platforma wiedzy medycznej Internetowa Księgarnia Medyczna Kalendarium Konferencji
International Maritime Health
MENU
Shortcuts Submit an article Author Guidelines Reviewers 2023

open access

Vol 74, No 2 (2023)
Original article
Submitted: 2023-04-15
Accepted: 2023-05-04
Published online: 2023-06-30
View PDF Download PDF file View HTML
Get Citation

Linkage of job ranks and personality traits with augmented stress: a study on Indian marine engineers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

Toorban Mitra1
DOI: 10.5603/IMH.2023.0017
·
Pubmed: 37417845
·
IMH 2023;74(2):112-121.
Affiliations
  1. Indian Maritime University, Kolkata Campus, Kolkata, India

open access

Vol 74, No 2 (2023)
MARITIME PSYCHOLOGY Original article
Submitted: 2023-04-15
Accepted: 2023-05-04
Published online: 2023-06-30

Abstract

Background: Marine engineering is a profession that affects a high level of physical and psychological stress. Such a high level of stress was further aggravated during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. On the other hand, personality traits and perceived stress are linked with each other, while job ranks also influence stress levels among employees. However, very few clinical studies are available on this mechanism in seafarers. This study explores the hidden area through the collection of cross-sectional data.

Materials and methods: Big Five personality traits instrument, along with a stress augmentation questionnaire, were administered among 280 Indian marine engineers across job ranks who have sailed prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The collected data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis test and structural equation modelling.

Results and Conclusions: The analysis reveals significant differences among Indian marine engineers across their job ranks towards their perception of augmented stress levels. It also indicates that, except for extraversion, personality traits have linkages with levels of augmented stress among Indian marine engineers during the pandemic.

Abstract

Background: Marine engineering is a profession that affects a high level of physical and psychological stress. Such a high level of stress was further aggravated during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. On the other hand, personality traits and perceived stress are linked with each other, while job ranks also influence stress levels among employees. However, very few clinical studies are available on this mechanism in seafarers. This study explores the hidden area through the collection of cross-sectional data.

Materials and methods: Big Five personality traits instrument, along with a stress augmentation questionnaire, were administered among 280 Indian marine engineers across job ranks who have sailed prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The collected data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis test and structural equation modelling.

Results and Conclusions: The analysis reveals significant differences among Indian marine engineers across their job ranks towards their perception of augmented stress levels. It also indicates that, except for extraversion, personality traits have linkages with levels of augmented stress among Indian marine engineers during the pandemic.

Full Text:

View PDF Download PDF file View HTML
Get Citation

Keywords

allostasis load, Big Five personality traits, structural equation modelling, Cronbach’s alpha, heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations

About this article
Title

Linkage of job ranks and personality traits with augmented stress: a study on Indian marine engineers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

Journal

International Maritime Health

Issue

Vol 74, No 2 (2023)

Article type

Original article

Pages

112-121

Published online

2023-06-30

Page views

1285

Article views/downloads

350

DOI

10.5603/IMH.2023.0017

Pubmed

37417845

Bibliographic record

IMH 2023;74(2):112-121.

Keywords

allostasis load
Big Five personality traits
structural equation modelling
Cronbach’s alpha
heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations

Authors

Toorban Mitra

References (61)
  1. Cox T, Griffiths A, Rial-Gonzalez E. Work-Related Stress. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg 2000.
  2. Hammen C. Stress and depression. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005; 1: 293–319.
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. Kendler KS, Karkowski LM, Prescott CA. Causal relationship between stressful life events and the onset of major depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1999; 156(6): 837–841.
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. Workplace Stress: a collective challenge, ILO, 2016, p. 5.
  5. McEwen BS. Stressed or Stress out: What is the difference? J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2005; 30(5): 315–318.
    PubMed
  6. Wright TA, Hobfoll SE. Commitment, psychological well-being and job performance: an examination of construction of resources (COR) theory and job burnout. J Business Management. 2004; 9(4): 389–406.
  7. Griffin M, Clarke S. Stress and well-being at work. In: Zedeck S (Ed.). APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization. 2011: 359–397.
    CrossRef
  8. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. Multiple Levels in Job Demands-Resources Theory: Implications for Employee Well-being and Performance. Diener E, Oishi S, Tay L (Eds.). Handbook of Wellbeing 2018: 1–13.
  9. Blewett V, Shaw A, LaMontagne T, Dollard M. Job stress : causes, impact and interventions in the health and community services sectorservices sector. 2006. file:///C:/Users/jniezgoda/Downloads/lamontagne-stresscauses-2006.pdf.
  10. Clarke S. Managing the Risk of Workplace Stress. 1st ed. Routledge 2004.
  11. Bartlett D. Stress perspectives and processes. Open University Press, Buckingham, England 1998.
  12. Sahni D. Impact of COVID-19 on Employee Behavior: Stress and Coping Mechanism During WFH (Work From Home) Among Service Industry Employees. Int J Operations Management. 2020; 1(1): 35–48.
    CrossRef
  13. Pauksztat B, Andrei DM, Grech MR. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of seafarers: A comparison using matched samples. Saf Sci. 2022; 146: 105542.
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. Carroll D. Health Psychology: Stress, Behaviour and Disease. 1st ed. Routledge 1992.
  15. Carroll D, Lovallo W, Phillips A. Are large physiological reactions to acute psychological stress always bad for health? Social Personality Psychology Compass. 2009; 3(5): 725–743.
    CrossRef
  16. Chida Y, Steptoe A. Greater cardiovascular responses to laboratory mental stress are associated with poor subsequent cardiovascular risk status: a meta-analysis of prospective evidence. Hypertension. 2010; 55(4): 1026–1032.
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. Hengartner MP, van der Linden D, Bohleber L, et al. Big five personality traits and the general factor of personality as moderators of stress and coping reactions following an emergency alarm on a Swiss University Campus. Stress Health. 2017; 33(1): 35–44.
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. Hengartner MP, Ajdacic-Gross V, Wyss C, et al. Relationship between personality and psychopathology in a longitudinal community study: a test of the predisposition model. Psychol Med. 2016; 46(8): 1693–1705.
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. Rai S, Kumar VV. Five Factor Model of Personality & Role Stress. Published by: Shri Ram Centre for Industrial Relations and Human Resources Stable URL : http://www.jstor. Indian J Industrail Relation. 2012; 48(2): 341–353.
  20. Costa PT, Somerfield MR, McCrae R. Personality and coping: A reconceptualisation. Handbook of Coping: Theory, Research, ApplicationsIn. In: Zeidner M, Endler NS (Eds.). Wiley, New York 1996: 44–61.
  21. Bolger N, Schilling EA. Personality and the problems of everyday life: the role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily stressors. J Pers. 1991; 59(3): 355–386.
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. Gunthert KC, Cohen LH, Armeli S. The role of neuroticism in daily stress and coping. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999; 77(5): 1087–1100.
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. O'Brien TB, DeLongis A. The interactional context of problem-, emotion-, and relationship-focused coping: the role of the big five personality factors. J Pers. 1996; 64(4): 775–813.
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. Ebstrup JF, Eplov LF, Pisinger C, et al. Association between the Five Factor personality traits and perceived stress: is the effect mediated by general self-efficacy? Anxiety Stress Coping. 2011; 24(4): 407–419.
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. Hintsa T, Hintsanen M, Jokela M, et al. The influence of temperament on long-term job strain and its components: The cardiovascular risk in Young Finns Study. Personality Individual Differences. 2010; 49(7): 700–705.
    CrossRef
  26. Hintsanen M, Hintsa T, Widell A, et al. Negative emotionality, activity, and sociability temperaments predicting long-term job strain and effort-reward imbalance: a 15-year prospective follow-up study. J Psychosom Res. 2011; 71(2): 90–96.
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. Sutin AR, Costa PT. Reciprocal influences of personality and job characteristics across middle adulthood. J Pers. 2010; 78(1): 257–288.
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. Jeżewska M, Leszczyńska I, Jeremin B. Work-related stress at sea self estimation by maritime students and officers. Int Marit Health. 2006; 57(1-4): 66–75.
    PubMed
  29. Parker AW, Hubinger LM, Green S, Sargent LS, Boyd B. A survey of the health stress and fatigue of Australian seafarers. Australian Maritime Safety Authority, Australian Government 1997.
  30. Oldenburg M, Jensen HJ, Latza U, et al. Seafaring stressors aboard merchant and passenger ships. Int J Public Health. 2009; 54(2): 96–105.
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. Oldenburg M, Jensen HJ, Wegner R. Burnout syndrome in seafarers in the merchant marine service. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013; 86(4): 407–416.
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. Carotenuto A, Molino I, Fasanaro A, et al. Psychological stress in seafarers: a review. 2012; 63(4): 188–194.
    PubMed
  33. Iversen RT. The mental health of seafarers. Int Marit Health. 2012; 63(2): 78–89.
    PubMed
  34. MacLachlan M, Kavanagh B, Kay A. Maritime health: a review with suggestions for research. Int Marit Health. 2012; 63(1): 1–6.
    PubMed
  35. Oldenburg M, Baur X, Schlaich C. Occupational risks and challenges of seafaring. J Occup Health. 2010; 52(5): 249–256.
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. Slišković A, Penezić Z. Occupational stressors, risks and health in the seafaring population. Rev Psychol. 2016; 22(1-2): 29–39.
    CrossRef
  37. Slišković A, Penezić Z. Lifestyle factors in Croatian seafarers as relating to health and stress on board. Work. 2017; 56(3): 371–380.
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. Rengamani J, Poongavanam S, Shameem A. Assessing the job stress of Indian seafarers’ based on job demand control model. Int J Mechanical Engineering Technology. 2017; 8(12): 150–159.
  39. Leszczyńska I, Jeżewska M, Jaremin B. Work-related stress at sea. Possibilities of research and measures of stress. Int Marit Health. 2008; 59(1-4): 93–102.
    PubMed
  40. https://unctad.org/news/united-nations-bodies-call-further-action-end-seafarer-crisis (accessed on 25.07.2022).
  41. Doumbia-Henry C. Shipping and COVID-19: protecting seafarers as frontline workers. WMU J Maritime Affairs. 2020; 19(3): 279–293.
    CrossRef
  42. Hebbar AA, Mukesh N. COVID-19 and seafarers' rights to shore leave, repatriation and medical assistance: a pilot study. Int Marit Health. 2020; 71(4): 217–228.
    CrossRefPubMed
  43. Slišković A. Seafarers' well-being in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Work. 2020; 67(4): 799–809.
    CrossRefPubMed
  44. Wong C. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the well-being of the stranded seafarers. Maritime Business Review. 2021.
    CrossRef
  45. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---normes/documents/genericdocument/wcms _741024.pdf (accessed on 25.07.2022).
  46. Erdem AT, Tutar H. Impact of COVID-19 anxiety on work stress in seafarers: the mediating role of COVID-19 burnout and intention to quit. Int Marit Health. 2022; 73(3): 133–142.
    CrossRefPubMed
  47. https://lloydslist.maritimeintelligence.informa.com/LL1135870/Suicides-at-sea-go-uncounted-as-crew-change-crisis-drags-on (accessed on 09.01.2023).
  48. Saulsman LM, Page AC. The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2004; 23(8): 1055–1085.
    CrossRefPubMed
  49. Fornell C, Larcker D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res. 1981; 18(1): 39.
    CrossRef
  50. Bentler PM, Chou CP. Practical issues in structural modeling. Soc Methods Res. 2016; 16(1): 78–117.
    CrossRef
  51. Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS, Basic concepts, Applications, and Programming (Second). Routledge 2016.
  52. Murphy MLM, Miller GE, Wrosch C. Conscientiousness and stress exposure and reactivity: a prospective study of adolescent females. J Behav Med. 2013; 36(2): 153–164.
    CrossRefPubMed
  53. Schlatter S, Louisy S, Canada B, et al. Personality traits affect anticipatory stress vulnerability and coping effectiveness in occupational critical care situations. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1): 20965.
    CrossRefPubMed
  54. Perry SJ, Witt LA, Penney LM, et al. The downside of goal-focused leadership: the role of personality in subordinate exhaustion. J Appl Psychol. 2010; 95(6): 1145–1153.
    CrossRefPubMed
  55. Zellars KL, Perrewé PL, Hochwarter WA, et al. The interactive effects of positive affect and conscientiousness on strain. J Occup Health Psychol. 2006; 11(3): 281–289.
    CrossRefPubMed
  56. Ikizer G, Kowal M, Aldemir İD, et al. Big Five traits predict stress and loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence for the role of neuroticism. Pers Individ Dif. 2022; 190: 111531.
    CrossRefPubMed
  57. Nikčević AV, Marino C, Kolubinski DC, et al. Modelling the contribution of the Big Five personality traits, health anxiety, and COVID-19 psychological distress to generalised anxiety and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Affect Disord. 2021; 279: 578–584.
    CrossRefPubMed
  58. Getzmann S, Digutsch J, Kleinsorge T. COVID-19 pandemic and personality: agreeable people are more stressed by the feeling of missing. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(20).
    CrossRefPubMed
  59. Roesch S, Wee C, Vaughn A. Relations between the Big Five personality traits and dispositional coping in Korean Americans: Acculturation as a moderating factor. Int J Psychology. 2006; 41(2): 85–96.
    CrossRef
  60. Xu Q, Li D, Dong Y, et al. The relationship between personality traits and clinical decision-making, anxiety and stress among intern nursing students during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023; 16: 57–69.
    CrossRefPubMed
  61. Mirhagi M, Sarabian S. Relationship between perceived stress and personality traits in emergency medical personnel. J Fundamentals Mental Health. 2016; 18(5): 265–271.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl