open access

Vol 74, No 1 (2023)
Original article
Submitted: 2022-11-07
Accepted: 2023-01-16
Published online: 2023-03-24
Get Citation

Working environment and fatigue among fishers in the north Atlantic: a field study

Annbjørg Selma Abrahamsen12, Ása Johannesen3, Fróði Debes1, Wessel M.A. van Leeuwen4, Pál Weihe12
·
Pubmed: 36974488
·
IMH 2023;74(1):1-14.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Occupational Medicine and Public Health, The Faroese Hospital System, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands
  2. Faculty of Health Sciences, The Faroese University, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands
  3. Department of Technology and Environment, Fiskaaling, Hvalvík, Faroe Islands
  4. Department of Psychology, Stress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

open access

Vol 74, No 1 (2023)
MARITIME/OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE Original article
Submitted: 2022-11-07
Accepted: 2023-01-16
Published online: 2023-03-24

Abstract

Background: This study investigates how Faroese deep-sea fishers’ exposure to work-related stressors affects their sleep, sleepiness, and levels of fatigue. Being constantly exposed to the unpredictable and harsh North Atlantic Ocean, having long work hours and split sleep for up to 40 days consecutively, they will arguably suffer from fatigue. Materials and methods: One hundred and fifty seven fishers participated in this study, and data was gathered throughout 202 days at sea. Subjective data was collected at the start and end of trips via questionnaires, sleep and sleepiness diaries and supplemented by objective sleep data through actigraphs. Ship movements were logged with a gyroscope connected to a laptop. A noise metre measured each work station and resting area, and noise exposure profiles were calculated based on each participant’s activity and location. Linear mixed-effect models investigated the effects of work exposure variables on sleep efficiency, and cumulative link mixed models measured effects on the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale and physical fatigue scale. Results: Time of day followed by ship movement were the exposure variables with the highest impact on the outcome variables of sleep efficiency, sleepiness and physical fatigue. The number of days at sea revealed correlations to outcome variables either by itself or interacting with the sleep periods per day. Crew size, shift system or noise did not impact outcome variables when in the model with other variables. Larger catches improved sleep efficiency but did not affect sleepiness and physical fatigue ratings. Conclusions: The findings indicate a chronically fatigued fisher population, and recommends urgent attention being paid to improving the structure of vessels and installing stabilators for greater stability at sea; work schedules being evaluated for protection of health; and work environments being designed that fulfill human physiological requirements in order to ensure the wellbeing and safety of those at sea.

Abstract

Background: This study investigates how Faroese deep-sea fishers’ exposure to work-related stressors affects their sleep, sleepiness, and levels of fatigue. Being constantly exposed to the unpredictable and harsh North Atlantic Ocean, having long work hours and split sleep for up to 40 days consecutively, they will arguably suffer from fatigue. Materials and methods: One hundred and fifty seven fishers participated in this study, and data was gathered throughout 202 days at sea. Subjective data was collected at the start and end of trips via questionnaires, sleep and sleepiness diaries and supplemented by objective sleep data through actigraphs. Ship movements were logged with a gyroscope connected to a laptop. A noise metre measured each work station and resting area, and noise exposure profiles were calculated based on each participant’s activity and location. Linear mixed-effect models investigated the effects of work exposure variables on sleep efficiency, and cumulative link mixed models measured effects on the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale and physical fatigue scale. Results: Time of day followed by ship movement were the exposure variables with the highest impact on the outcome variables of sleep efficiency, sleepiness and physical fatigue. The number of days at sea revealed correlations to outcome variables either by itself or interacting with the sleep periods per day. Crew size, shift system or noise did not impact outcome variables when in the model with other variables. Larger catches improved sleep efficiency but did not affect sleepiness and physical fatigue ratings. Conclusions: The findings indicate a chronically fatigued fisher population, and recommends urgent attention being paid to improving the structure of vessels and installing stabilators for greater stability at sea; work schedules being evaluated for protection of health; and work environments being designed that fulfill human physiological requirements in order to ensure the wellbeing and safety of those at sea.

Get Citation

Keywords

fishers, work environment, roll, noise, fatigue, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (MFI-20), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS), sleep, sleepiness, shiftwork

About this article
Title

Working environment and fatigue among fishers in the north Atlantic: a field study

Journal

International Maritime Health

Issue

Vol 74, No 1 (2023)

Article type

Original article

Pages

1-14

Published online

2023-03-24

Page views

2452

Article views/downloads

533

DOI

10.5603/IMH.2023.0001

Pubmed

36974488

Bibliographic record

IMH 2023;74(1):1-14.

Keywords

fishers
work environment
roll
noise
fatigue
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (MFI-20)
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)
sleep
sleepiness
shiftwork

Authors

Annbjørg Selma Abrahamsen
Ása Johannesen
Fróði Debes
Wessel M.A. van Leeuwen
Pál Weihe

References (54)
  1. Christiansen JM, Hovmand SR. Prevention of accidents at work in Nordic fisheries – What has worked? In: Nordic Council of Ministers. TemaNord, Copenhagen 2017.
  2. Jensen OCC, Petursdottir G, Holmen IM, et al. A review of fatal accident incidence rate trends in fishing. Int Marit Health. 2014; 65(2): 47–52.
  3. Thorvaldsen T, Kaustell K, Mattila T, et al. What works? Results of a Nordic survey on fishers' perceptions of safety measures. Marine Policy. 2018; 95: 95–101.
  4. Wadsworth EJK, Allen PH, McNamara RL, et al. Fatigue and health in a seafaring population. Occup Med (Lond). 2008; 58(3): 198–204.
  5. Smith AP, Allen PH, Wadsworth EJK. Crew, manning and fatigue. In: Pocket D, Patraiko D (eds). Navigation Accidents and their Causes. The Nautical Institute, www.nautinst.org 2015.
  6. Ricci JA, Chee E, Lorandeau AL, et al. Fatigue in the U.S. workforce: prevalence and implications for lost productive work time. J Occup Environ Med. 2007; 49(1): 1–10.
  7. Barnett M, Zhao Z, van Leeuwen WMA. Project MARTHA: The Final Report. January 2017. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30339.30249.
  8. Oldenburg M, Jensen HJ. Stress and strain among merchant seafarers differs across the three voyage episodes of port stay, river passage and sea passage. PLoS One. 2019; 14(6): e0217904.
  9. Silvetti A, Munafò E, Ranavolo A, et al. Ergonomic risk assessment of sea fisherman part III: manual handling and static posture. Adv Intelligent Systems Computing. 2019: 379–392.
  10. Akerstedt T. Work hours and sleepiness. Neurophysiol Clin. 1995; 25(6): 367–375.
  11. Åkerstedt T. Shift work. Encyclopedia of Sleep. 2013: 197–201.
  12. Breidahl T, Christensen M, Jepsen JR, et al. The influence of ship movements on the energy expenditure of fishermen. A study during a North Sea voyage in calm weather. Int Marit Health. 2013; 64(3): 114–120.
  13. Duncan CA, MacKinnon SN, Marais JF, et al. Energy cost associated with moving platforms. PeerJ. 2018; 6: e5439.
  14. Akerstedt T, Gillberg M. Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. Int J Neurosci. 1990; 52(1-2): 29–37.
  15. Abrahamsen A, Weihe P, Fróði D, et al. Sleep, sleepiness, and fatigue on board faroese fishing vessels. Nat Sci Sleep. 2022; 14: 347–362.
  16. Åkerstedt T, Kecklund G, Axelsson J. Subjective and objective quality of sleep. Somnologie - Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin. 2008; 12(2): 104–109.
  17. Hansen JH, Holmen IM. Sleep disturbances among offshore fleet workers: a questionnaire-based survey. Int Marit Health. 2011; 62(2): 123–130.
  18. World Health Organization. Burden of Disease from Environmental Noise 2011; 128.
  19. Costa G. Shift work and occupational medicine: an overview. Occup Med (Lond). 2003; 53(2): 83–88.
  20. Parkes KR. Age, smoking, and negative affectivity as predictors of sleep patterns among shiftworkers in two environments. J Occup Health Psychol. 2002; 7(2): 156–173.
  21. Richardson G, Tate B. Hormonal and pharmacological manipulation of the circadian clock: recent developments and future strategies. Sleep. 2000; 23 Suppl 3: S77–S85.
  22. Härmä M, Partinen M, Repo R, et al. Effects of 6/6 and 4/8 watch systems on sleepiness among bridge officers. Chronobiol Int. 2008; 25(2): 413–423.
  23. Short MA, Agostini A, Lushington K, et al. A systematic review of the sleep, sleepiness, and performance implications of limited wake shift work schedules. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015; 41(5): 425–440.
  24. Olafsdóttir L. The relationship between fishermen's health and sleeping habits. Work. 2004; 22(1): 57–61.
  25. Cole RJ, Kripke DF, Gruen W, et al. Automatic sleep/wake identification from wrist activity. Sleep. 1992; 15(5): 461–469.
  26. Akerstedt T, Gillberg M. Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. Int J Neurosci. 1990; 52(1-2): 29–37.
  27. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, et al. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989; 28(2): 193–213.
  28. Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, et al. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res. 1995; 39(3): 315–325.
  29. Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J Open Source Software. 2019; 4(43): 1686.
  30. Read T, Files E. Package ‘readxl' 2022.
  31. Time TP, Date D, Implements D, Mit L, Utf LE, Kirill A, Kirill M, Date RC. Package 'hms' 2022.
  32. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, et al. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J Statistical Software. 2015; 67(1): 1–48.
  33. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff P, Christensen R. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. J Statistical Software. 2017; 82(13): 1–26.
  34. Package T. Package ‘ordinal' 2022.
  35. Linear T, Mixed N, Models E, Fit D, Hmisc S. Package ‘nlme' 2022.
  36. Zeileis A, Fisher J, Hornik K, et al. Colorspace: a toolbox for manipulating and assessing colors and palettes. J Statistical Software. 2020; 96(1): 1–49.
  37. Package T. Package 'gridExtra' 2022.
  38. Østergaard H, Poulsen TR, Remmen LN. Ergonomisk arbejdsmiljø, fysisk belastning og fatigue på danske fiskefartøjer. 2015. https://www.sdu.dk/-/media/files/om_sdu/institutter/ist/maritimsundhed/rapporter/ergonomisk+arbejdsmiljø+fysiske+belastninger+og+fatigue+på+danske+fiskefartøjer.pdf.
  39. Boter H, Mänty M, Hansen AM, et al. Self-reported fatigue and physical function in late mid-life. J Rehabil Med. 2014; 46(7): 684–690.
  40. Watt T, Groenvold M, Bjorner JB, et al. Fatigue in the Danish general population. Influence of sociodemographic factors and disease. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000; 54(11): 827–833.
  41. Dietch JR, Taylor DJ, Sethi K, et al. Psychometric Evaluation of the PSQI in U.S. College Students. J Clin Sleep Med. 2016; 12(8): 1121–1129.
  42. Jepsen JR, Zhao Z, van Leeuwen WMA. Seafarer fatigue: a review of risk factors, consequences for seafarers' health and safety and options for mitigation. Int Marit Health. 2015; 66(2): 106–117.
  43. Smith A, Allen P, Wadsworth E. Seafarer fatigue: the Cardiff Research Programme. November 2006.
  44. Akerstedt T, Anund A, Axelsson J, et al. Subjective sleepiness is a sensitive indicator of insufficient sleep and impaired waking function. J Sleep Res. 2014; 23(3): 240–252.
  45. Lützhöft M, Dahlgren A, Kircher A, et al. Fatigue at sea in Swedish shipping-a field study. Am J Ind Med. 2010; 53(7): 733–740.
  46. van Leeuwen WMA, Kircher A, Dahlgren A, et al. Sleep, sleepiness, and neurobehavioral performance while on watch in a simulated 4 hours on/8 hours off maritime watch system. Chronobiol Int. 2013; 30(9): 1108–1115.
  47. Lack LC, Lushington K. The rhythms of human sleep propensity and core body temperature. J Sleep Res. 1996; 5(1): 1–11.
  48. Monk TH. Subjective ratings of sleepiness: the underlying circadian mechanisms. Sleep. 1987; 10(4): 343–353.
  49. Oldenburg M, Jensen HJ, Latza U, et al. Seafaring stressors aboard merchant and passenger ships. Int J Public Health. 2009; 54(2): 96–105.
  50. Sąlyga J, Kušleikaitė M. Factors influencing psychoemotional strain and fatigue, and relationship of these factors with health complaints at sea among lithuanian seafarers. Medicina (Kaunas). 2011; 47(12): 675–681.
  51. Sunde E, Bratveit M, Pallesen S, et al. Noise and sleep on board vessels in the Royal Norwegian Navy. Noise Health. 2016; 18(81): 85–92.
  52. Tamura Y, Horiyasu T, Sano Y, et al. Habituation of sleep to a ship's noise as determined by actigraphy and a sleep questionnaire. J Sound Vibration. 2002; 250(1): 107–113.
  53. Hilgard ER, Atkinson RC, Atkinson RL. Introduction to psychology. 8th ed. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1983.
  54. McNamara R, Smith A. Combined effects of fatigue indicators on the health and wellbeing of workers in the offshore oil industry. J Health Med Sci. 2020; 3(3).

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl