open access

Vol 68, No 3 (2017)
MARITIME PSYCHOLOGY Review article
Published online: 2017-09-27
Submitted: 2017-08-05
Accepted: 2017-09-06
Get Citation

Psychological considerations in submarine escape training: brief overview and future directions

Charles H. Van Wijk
DOI: 10.5603/IMH.2017.0030
·
Pubmed: 28952663
·
International Maritime Health 2017;68(3):168-173.

open access

Vol 68, No 3 (2017)
MARITIME PSYCHOLOGY Review article
Published online: 2017-09-27
Submitted: 2017-08-05
Accepted: 2017-09-06

Abstract

The inability of a submarine to surface must rate as one of greatest risks to sailors in peacetime. To prepare for such emergencies, many navies provide training to master the procedures required to escape successfully from disabled submarines. This paper provides a brief overview of some of the psychological principles in simulated submarine escape training. It further discusses applicable psychological constructs such as positive outcome expectancies, the role of anxiety, and other personal factors mediating outcomes of such training. It concludes with recommendations for future research aimed at enhancing the safety and impact of submarine escape training. These include enhanced detection of psychological risk factors such as anxiety, as well as investigating the relative contribution of personality variables to in-training safety and positive outcome expectancies. These recommendations do not only apply to submarine escape training, but may also be applicable to high fidelity safety training in other off-shore survival contexts, such as helicopter underwater escape training, freefall lifeboat training and smoke diving.

Abstract

The inability of a submarine to surface must rate as one of greatest risks to sailors in peacetime. To prepare for such emergencies, many navies provide training to master the procedures required to escape successfully from disabled submarines. This paper provides a brief overview of some of the psychological principles in simulated submarine escape training. It further discusses applicable psychological constructs such as positive outcome expectancies, the role of anxiety, and other personal factors mediating outcomes of such training. It concludes with recommendations for future research aimed at enhancing the safety and impact of submarine escape training. These include enhanced detection of psychological risk factors such as anxiety, as well as investigating the relative contribution of personality variables to in-training safety and positive outcome expectancies. These recommendations do not only apply to submarine escape training, but may also be applicable to high fidelity safety training in other off-shore survival contexts, such as helicopter underwater escape training, freefall lifeboat training and smoke diving.

Get Citation

Keywords

psychology, anxiety, positive outcome expectancies, pressurised underwater escape, simulator training

About this article
Title

Psychological considerations in submarine escape training: brief overview and future directions

Journal

International Maritime Health

Issue

Vol 68, No 3 (2017)

Pages

168-173

Published online

2017-09-27

DOI

10.5603/IMH.2017.0030

Pubmed

28952663

Bibliographic record

International Maritime Health 2017;68(3):168-173.

Keywords

psychology
anxiety
positive outcome expectancies
pressurised underwater escape
simulator training

Authors

Charles H. Van Wijk

References (36)
  1. Adkisson G. Submarine Escape and Rescue. SPUMS J. 1990; 20(4): 220–222.
  2. Shelford WO. “Subsunk”. London: George G Harrap & Co Ltd London, 1960.
  3. Tabb HJ. Escape from Submarines: A Short Historical Overview of Policy and Equipment in the Royal Navy. R I N A Transactions. 1975; 117: 19–39.
  4. Elliott D. A short history of submarine escape: the development of an extreme air dive. SPUMS J. 1999; 29(2): 81–87.
  5. O’Brien G. Submarine escape: Where now? Nav Int. 1987; 92(9): 482–484.
  6. O’Brien G. The Great Escape. Defence. https://archive.is/BK8JG (1988).
  7. White MG. Submarine escape and rescue. Naval Forces. 1990; 11(1): 41–47.
  8. Turner MS. Submarine escape from a depth of 300 feet: a personal experience. J R Nav Med Serv. 1995; 81(3): 210–213.
  9. Walker RMA. complete submarine escape and rescue organisation. SPUMS J. 1997; 27(2): 95–101.
  10. Walker R. Submarine Medicine. In: Edmonds C, Lowry C, Pennefather J, Walker R, editors. Diving and Subaquatic Medicine, 4th ed. New York: Hodder-Arnold. Diving Subaquatic Med. 2002: 665–670.
  11. Moses H. Casualties in individual submarine escape. Groton, Conn.: US Naval Submarine Medical Centre Groton, 1964.
  12. International Submarine Escape and Rescue Liaison Office. http://www.ismerlo.org/ (2017).
  13. Yildiz S, Ay H, Günay A, et al. Submarine escape from depths of 30 and 60 feet: 41,183 training ascents without serious injury. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004; 75(3): 269–271.
  14. Trousselard M, Cian C, Barraud PA, et al. Physiological and Psychological Effects of Escape from a Sunken Submarine on Shore and at Sea. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2009; 80(10): 850–856.
  15. Knight J, Williams GA. medical review of emergency ascent training. SPUMS J. 1993; 23(4): 230–236.
  16. Harris RA, Coleshaw SRK, MacKenzie IG. Analysing stress in offshore survival course trainees. Aberdeen: Health and Safety Executive, 1996. Offshore Technology Report: OTH 94 446. http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/othpdf/400-499/oth446.pdf (1996).
  17. Hytten K, Jensen A, Skauli G. Stress inoculation training for smoke divers and free fall lifeboat passengers. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1990; 61(11): 983–988.
  18. Hytten K, Jensen A, Vaernes R. Effects of underwater escape training--a psychophysiological study. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1989; 60(5): 460–464.
  19. van Wijk C. Submarine escape: the effect of training on anxiety. Mil Med. 1998; 163(2): 68–70.
  20. O'Donnell SW, Horn WG. Initial review of the U.S. Navy's pressurized submarine escape training outcomes. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2014; 41(1): 33–40.
  21. Blake D. The Great Escape. Navy News 1997: 12–13.
  22. Keinan G. Training for dangerous task performance: The effect of expectations and feedback. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1988; 18(4): 355–373.
  23. Slaven GM, Windle CM. Cognitive performance over 7 days in a distressed submarine. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999; 70(6): 604–608.
  24. Eid J, Johnsen BH, Saus ER, et al. Stress and coping in a week-long disabled submarine exercise. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004; 75(7): 616–621.
  25. Eid J, Johnsen BH. Acute stress reactions after submarine accidents. Mil Med. 2002; 167(5): 427–431.
  26. Berg JS, Grieger TA, Spira JL. Psychiatric symptoms and cognitive appraisal following the near sinking of a research submarine. Mil Med. 2005; 170(1): 44–47.
  27. Kimhi S. Understanding Good Coping: A Submarine Crew Coping with Extreme Environmental Conditions. Psychol. 2011; 02(09): 961–967.
  28. Institute for Maritime Medicine. The Effect of Submarine Escape Training on Anxiety and Confidence. Simon’s Town: South African Military Health Service; 1999. Technical Report South African, 1999.
  29. Tipton MJ, Gibbs P, Brooks C, et al. ECG during helicopter underwater escape training. Aviat Space Environ Med. https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.2700.2010 (2010).
  30. Brooks CJ, Gibbs PN, Jenkins JL, et al. Desensitizing a pilot with a phobic response to required helicopter underwater escape training. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007; 78(6): 618–623.
  31. Saunders T, Driskell JE, Johnston JH, et al. The effect of stress inoculation training on anxiety and performance. J Occup Health Psychol. 1996; 1(2): 170–186.
  32. Trousselard M. Escape from a Diving Submarine Simulator: Impacts of Mindfulness Differences on Physio-Biological Responses and Cognitive Performances. Paper presented at the RTO Human Factors and Medicine Panel Symposium Bulgaria, 2009.
  33. Morgan WP, Raglin JS, O'Connor PJ. Trait anxiety predicts panic behavior in beginning scuba students. Int J Sports Med. 2004; 25(4): 314–322.
  34. Colvard DF. Identifying anxiety and panic risk in divers. Paper presented at DAN-SA Diver Stress and Panic Prevention Workshopdivers. Johannesburg, South Africa, 2007 Sep 27.
  35. Carver C. The Internal-External Scale Confounds Internal Locus of Control with Expectancies of Positive Outcomes. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1997; 23(6): 580–585.
  36. Van Wijk C, Fourie M. Using psychological markers of sport injuries for navy diving training. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2015; 15(1): 1–11.

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl