Vol 71, No 4 (2020)
Original article
Published online: 2020-12-30

open access

Page views 1151
Article views/downloads 1034
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Optokinetic stimulation efficiency for sea sickness treatment

Alexis Maffert1, Barbara Aupy1
Pubmed: 33394489
IMH 2020;71(4):249-252.

Abstract

Background: Sea sickness is the type of motion sickness induced by maritime transport. Its prevention through optokinetic exercises is efficient. The object of this study is to evaluate the efficiency experienced by the patients as well as the impact on other motion sicknesses. Materials and methods: One hundred and forty-one patients underwent optokinetic treatment methods between 2006 and 2014. The following parameters were studied and scored on a numeric scale: sea sickness, intensity of vomiting and ability to hold position and duties on board.

Results: Study parameters significantly improved by optokinetic reeducation method. Sea sickness was reduced by a factor of 2. Study settings were also stable over years. Other motion sicknesses were also improved with this optokinetic stimulation. Conclusions: Treating sea sickness by optokinetic stimulation reeducation gives good results particularly improving its related clinical manifestations, therefore allowing seamen to properly hold their functions on board. Its efficiency lasts in time and seems promising for the management of other motion sicknesses.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Sherman CR. Motion sickness: review of causes and preventive strategies. J Travel Med. 2002; 9(5): 251–256.
  2. Bles W, Bos JE, de Graaf B, et al. Motion sickness: only one provocative conflict? Brain Res Bull. 1998; 47(5): 481–487.
  3. Khalid H, Turan O, Bos J, et al. Application of the subjective vertical–horizontal-conflict physiological motion sickness model to the field trials of contemporary vessels. Ocean Engineering. 2011; 38(1): 22–33.
  4. Bonne L, Loaec E, Aupy B, et al. Cinétose. EMC - Oto-rhino-laryngologie. 2017; 12(1): 1–5.
  5. Trendel D, Haus-Cheymol R, Erauso T, et al. Optokinetic stimulation rehabilitation in preventing seasickness. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2010; 127(4): 125–129.
  6. Ressiot E, Dolz M, Bonne L, et al. Prospective study on the efficacy of optokinetic training in the treatment of seasickness. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2013; 130(5): 263–268.
  7. Graybiel A, Wood CD, Miller EF, et al. Diagnostic criteria for grading the severity of acute motion sickness. Aerosp Med. 1968; 39(5): 453–455.
  8. Bos JE, Bles W. Motion sickness induced by optokinetic drums. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004; 75(2): 172–174.
  9. Rine RM, Schubert MC, Balkany TJ. Visual-vestibular habituation and balance training for motion sickness. Phys Ther. 1999; 79(10): 949–957.
  10. Perreaut P. 'Comprendre et Pratiquer les Techniques d’Optimisation du Potentiel' 2014 Inter Editions.
  11. Golding JF, Kadzere P, Gresty MA. Motion sickness susceptibility fluctuates through the menstrual cycle. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005; 76(10): 970–973.
  12. Matchock RL, Levine ME, Gianaros PJ, et al. Susceptibility to nausea and motion sickness as a function of the menstrual cycle. Womens Health Issues. 2008; 18(4): 328–335.
  13. Flanagan MB, May JG, Dobie TG. Sex differences in tolerance to visually-induced motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005; 76(7): 642–646.
  14. Bos JE, Damala D, Lewis C, et al. Susceptibility to seasickness. Ergonomics. 2007; 50(6): 890–901.