Online first
Original article
Published online: 2025-03-05

open access

Page views 56
Article views/downloads 43
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Audiological profile of fishermen using fiber motor boats in Puducherry

Abstract

Background: Fishermen face multiple occupational health risks including drowning, traumatic injuries, asphyxia, and skin allergies. Additionally, their exposure to high intensities of engine noise during fishing puts them at risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). Inadequate use of ear protective devices and lack of awareness further contribute to the prevalence of NIHL among fishermen. This study aims to measure the engine noise level of fiber motor boats and develop an audiological profile of fishermen in Puducherry.

Materials and methods: Thirty fishermen between the ages of 20 to 45 years, who operate fiber motor boats were tested using pure-tone and speech audiometry, high-frequency audiometry, immittance audiometry, single and multifrequency tympanometry, and distortion product oto-acoustic emissions (DPOAEs). Additionally, the engine noise level of fiber motor boats was measured using a sound level meter.

Results: The engine noise levels ranged from 92 dB(A) to 115 dB(A) and 81 dB(A) to 106 dB(A) at 3 feet and 6 feet distance respectively, which exceeds the permissible 90 dB(A) limit 

in accordance to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards for 8 hours. Audiological test results indicated hearing loss primarily at 4 kHz and at higher frequencies. Single and multifrequency tympanometry results were atypical. Although pure tone audiometry (PTA) at standard frequencies was normal, DPOAEs were affected.

Conclusion: It is crucial to educate fishermen about ear care and the use of ear protection to prevent hearing loss due to harmful noise levels. In addition, the importance of using high-frequency audiometry and oto-acoustic emissions (OAEs) for early detection of NIHL is emphasized.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Yadav OmP, Sarkar A, Shan D, et al. Occupational noise exposure and health impacts among fish harvesters: a systematic review. Int Marit Health. 2021; 72(3): 199–205.
  2. C.Seethalakshmi and Dr.Karaline Karunagari. Occupational health problems of the fishermen residing in selected villages at cuddalore district. Int J Creat Res Thoughts. http://ijcrt.org/viewfull.php?&p_id=IJCRT2201339.
  3. Ernawati M. Literature review: risk factors affecting hearing loss among fishermen in Indonesia. J drug deliv ther. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2021; May 15(11): 153–159.
  4. Tasik YI. Analisis Hubungan Tingkat Kebisingan terhadap Penurunan Ambang Dengar (Hearing Loss) pada Nelayan Kelurahan Pontap Kota Palopo Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan Tahun 2016 [Analysis of the Relationship between Noise Levels and Hearing Loss in Fishermen in Pontap Village, Palopo City, South Sulawesi Province in 2016]. J Kesehat Mega Buana. 2018; 4(1):1-9. https://osf.io/gyejz/download.
  5. Anwar M, Savitri E, Dyah T. Audiometric Profile of Fishermen Using Motor Boat in Barombong Village, Makassar. Indian J Public Heal Res Dev. 2019; 10(10): 1530.
  6. Rapisarda V, Valentino M, Bolognini S, et al. Il rischio rumore a bordo dei pescherecci: alcune considerazioni sulla prevenzione e protezione degli esposti [Noise-related occupational risk aboard fishing vessels: considerations on prevention and the protection of exposed workers]. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2004 Jul-Sep; 26(3): 191–196.
  7. Sinworn S, Viriyawattana N. Effect of small boat engine noise on hearing loss of fishermen and efficiency of small boat engine silencer. Glob J Environ Sci Manag. 2024; 10(3): 1297–1312.
  8. Vinezzia D. Identifikasi bahaya keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja pada aktivitas nelayan. J Penelit Perawat Prof. 2021; 3(1): 117–126.
  9. Paini MC, Morata TC, Corteletti LJ, et al. Audiological findings among workers from Brazilian small-scale fisheries. Ear Hear. 2009; 30(1): 8–15.
  10. L A, Tukalan G, Anchery V, et al. Evaluation of noise induced hearing loss in fishermen who work in motor boats in Karaikal. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2015; 4(73): 12645–12651.
  11. Avan P, Bonfils P. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission spectra and high-resolution audiometry in noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res. 2005; 209(1-2): 68–75.
  12. Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use. Br Med Bull. 2002; 63: 223–241.
  13. Frank T. ANSI update: maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms. Am J Audiol. 2000; 9(1): 3–8.
  14. Carhart R, Jerger J. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord. 1959; 24(4): 330–345.
  15. Boominathan P. Picture speech identification test for children in Tamil [master’s dissertation] Mysore: University of Mysore, 1999.
  16. Samuel JD. Development and standardization of phonetically balanced test materials in Tamil language [master’s dissertation] Mysore: University of Mysore, 1976.
  17. Levin JL, Curry WF, Shepherd S, et al. Hearing Loss and Noise Exposure Among Commercial Fishermen in the Gulf Coast. J Occup Environ Med. 2016; 58(3): 306–313.
  18. Kirchner DB, Evenson E, Dobie RA, et al. ACOEM Task Force on Occupational Hearing Loss. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss: ACOEM Task Force on Occupational Hearing Loss. J Occup Environ Med. 2012; 54(1): 106–108.
  19. Suter AH. Construction noise: exposure, effects, and the potential for remediation; a review and analysis. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2002; 63(6): 768–789.
  20. Sharif A, Taous A, Siddique BH, et al. Prevalence of noise induced hearing loss among traffic police in Dhaka Metropolitan City. Mymensingh Med J. 2009; 18(1 Suppl): S24–S28.
  21. Ranga R, Yadav S, Yadav A, et al. Prevalence of occupational noise induced hearing loss in industrial workers. Indian J Otol. 2014; 20(3): 115.
  22. Liberman MC, Epstein MJ, Cleveland SS, et al. Toward a differential diagnosis of hidden hearing loss in humans. PLoS One. 2016; 11(9): e0162726.
  23. Gelfand SA. Essentials of Audiology 4th ed. New York: Thieme .
  24. Özgür A, Müjdeci B, Terzi S, et al. Wideband tympanometry normative data for different age groups in turkish population. J Int Adv Otol. 2016; 12(1): 82–86.
  25. Demir E, Afacan NN, Celiker M, et al. Can wideband tympanometry be used as a screening test for superior semicircular canal dehiscence? Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; 12(3): 249–254.
  26. Śliwa L, Kochanek K, Jedrzejczak WW, et al. Measurement of wideband absorbance as a test for otosclerosis. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(6).
  27. Mehrparvar AH, Mirmohammadi SJ, Davari MH, et al. Conventional audiometry, extended high-frequency audiometry, and DPOAE for early diagnosis of NIHL. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014; 16(1): e9628.
  28. Zeena VP. Cochlear and neural functions in industrial workers exposed to occupational noise [master’s dissertation] Mysore: University of Mysore, 2015.