Vol 75, No 3 (2024)
Original article
Published online: 2024-09-30

open access

Page views 178
Article views/downloads 82
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Impact on seafarers of extreme events: A case study arising out of the situation in Ukraine

Anish Arvind Hebbar1, Teona Khabeishvili1
DOI: 10.5603/imh.100443
Pubmed: 39411990
IMH 2024;75(3):190-203.

Abstract

Background: Maritime transportation is the lifeblood of the world’s economy. However, seafarers are exposed to isolated, confined and particularly extreme environments. Maritime operations in the face of geopolitical conflicts profoundly impact seafarers’ mental health, well-being and safety.

Materials and methods: The study comprises 27 seafarer interviews and 21 stakeholder interviews covering 4 maritime education and training institutions, 11 crewing agencies, 4 medical facilities and 2 maritime authorities. An online questionnaire survey of seafarers who were affected by the conflict in Ukraine and had sailed in the conflict zone in the period 24 February 2022 to 30 September 2023 yielded 319 valid responses.

Results: The study suggests that seafarers in the conflict zone are exposed to constant imminent threats to personal safety, constant stress and anxiety, prolonged lack of sleep, limited opportunities of contact with families, and high risk to mental health among other things further exacerbated by a lack of mental health support from company, and anxiety resulting from loss of access to shore-based training facilities and uncertainty in updating competency certificates.

Conclusions: The study presents rare insights on the psychological and emotional toll on seafarers who continue to serve the critical needs of the maritime transportation industry in a newly ordained role as keyworkers. This study underscores the need for improved mental health support and counselling services within the maritime industry, in particular, maritime stakeholders likely affected by geopolitical conflicts.

Highlights: From the practical perspective, this is among the first studies to focus on the mental health and well-being of seafarers arising out of the situation in Ukraine since 24 February 2022. From the theoretical perspective, this is a maiden study attempting an exploration of social conditions in three different dimensions by integrating three distinct theoretical constructs namely, UN Human Security Framework, Holmes & Rahe Social Readjustment Rating Scale and ILO Maritime Labour Convention framework.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Aarnes Ø. Extreme Weather Risks to Maritime Activities. Working Paper 5. Case study 3. H2020 Blue Action: Arctic impact on weather and climate. 2018. https://zenodo.org/record/1405625/files/Review_13092018_WP5_CS3_29082018.pdf..
  2. Georgieva D. Increase of the crew’s well-being and reduction of stress. Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy. 2019; XXII(1): 83–90.
  3. Lefkowitz RY, Slade, MD. Seafarer Mental Health Study, Final Report. ITF seafarers’ Trust and Yale University. 2019. https://www.seafarerstrust.org/sites/default/files/node/publications/files/ST_MentalHealthReport_Final_Digital-1.pdf..
  4. Oldenburg M, Jensen HJ. Stress and strain among seafarers related to the occupational groups. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(7).
  5. Brooks SK, Greenberg N. Mental health and wellbeing of seafaring personnel during COVID-19: Scoping review. J Occup Health. 2022; 64(1): e12361.
  6. UNCTAD. Review of Maritime Transport 2013. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva. 2013. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2013_en.pdf.
  7. Tang L. The impact of 2008 financial crisis and COVID-19 pandemic on the demand and supply of seafarer officers: Evidence from China. Mar Policy. 2022; 145: 105263.
  8. UNCTAD. Maritime trade weathers COVID-19 storm but faces far-reaching knock-on effects, 18 November 2021. https://unctad.org/news/maritime-trade-weathers-covid-19-storm-faces-far-reaching-knock-effects.
  9. Vo T, Tran M. The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on the global trade. International J Soc Sci Economics Invent. 2021; 7(01).
  10. De Beukelaer C. COVID-19 border closures cause humanitarian crew change crisis at sea. Mar Policy. 2021; 132: 104661.
  11. Hebbar AA, Mukesh N. COVID-19 and seafarers' rights to shore leave, repatriation and medical assistance: a pilot study. Int Marit Health. 2020; 71(4): 217–228.
  12. Byrnes KP, Rhoades DL, Williams MJ, et al. The effect of a safety crisis on safety culture and safety climate: The resilience of a flight training organization during COVID-19. Transp Policy (Oxf). 2022; 117: 181–191.
  13. EMSA. Impact of COVID-19 on the Maritime Sector in the EU. 2021. https://emsa.europa.eu/csn-menu/items.html?cid=14&id=4436.
  14. Pauksztat B, Andrei DM, Grech MR. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of seafarers: A comparison using matched samples. Saf Sci. 2022; 146: 105542.
  15. Lucas D, Jego C, Jensen OC, et al. Seafarers' mental health in the COVID-19 era: lost at sea? Int Marit Health. 2021; 72(2): 138–141.
  16. UN. UN recognizes work of 2 million seafarers in ‘extraordinarily challenging times’. UN News Global perspective Human stories. UN Affairs. https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/09/1101782. (30 September 2021.).
  17. Acejo I, Sampson H, Turgo N, Ellis N. Tang L. The causes of maritime accidents in the period 2002-2016. Seafarers International Research Centre, Cardiff University. 2018. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/117481.
  18. Sampson H, Ellis N. Stepping up: the need for proactive employer investment in safeguarding seafarers’ mental health and wellbeing. Marit Policy Management. 2020; 48(8): 1069–1081.
  19. Exarchopoulos G, Zhang P, Pryce-Roberts N, et al. Seafarers’ welfare: A critical review of the related legal issues under the Maritime Labour Convention 2006. Marine Policy. 2018; 93: 62–70.
  20. Yazir D, Şahin B, Yip TL, et al. Effects of COVID-19 on maritime industry: a review. Int Marit Health. 2020; 71(4): 253–264.
  21. Sanders D. Maritime Power in the Black Sea (1st ed.). Routledge: London. 2014. .
  22. Fink M. Naval blockade and the Russia–Ukraine Conflict. Netherlands International Law Review. 2022; 69(3): 411–437.
  23. IMO. Impact on shipping and seafarers of the situation in the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov. International Maritime Organization Legal Committee, 110th session, LEG 110/5(a). ; 1: 2023.
  24. ICS. Russian and Ukrainian seafarers make up 14.5% of global shipping workforce, according to ICS. ICS Press Release, London, 24 February 2022. https://www.ics-shipping.org/press-release/russian-and-ukrainian-seafarers-make-up-14-5-of-global-shipping-workforce-according-to-ics/.
  25. Kravets E. Report Card. Maritime Executive. 14 March 2023. https://maritime-executive.com/magazine/report-card.
  26. Carotenuto A, Molino I, Fasanaro AM, et al. Psychological stress in seafarers: a review. Int Marit Health. 2012; 63(4): 188–194.
  27. Iversen RTB. The mental health of seafarers. Int Marit Health. 2012; 63(2): 78–89.
  28. Ogbodum MU, Ogunkola IO, Adetola AA, et al. Mental health of seafarers amidst pandemics. Int Marit Health. 2022; 73(4): 223–224.
  29. UNDP. Human Development Report 1994. New Dimensions of Human Security. New York: Oxford University Press, Chapter 2. 1994. https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/hdr1994encompletenostats.pdf.
  30. McDonald M. Human security and the construction of security. Global Society. 2010; 16(3): 277–295.
  31. Holmes TH, Rahe RH. The social readjustment rating scale. J Psychosom Res. 1967; 11(2): 213–218.
  32. Marksberry K. Holmes-Rahe Stress Inventory. The American Institute of Stress. 2022, February 11. https://www.stress.org/holmes-rahe-stress-inventory.
  33. ILO. Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 as amended. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---normes/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_763684.pdf.
  34. Maritime Transport Workers’ Trade Union of Ukraine. Extension of documents of Ukrainian seafarers. 2022, November 28. https://mtwtu.org.ua/en/news/prodovzenna-dii-dokumentiv-ukrainskih-morakiv.
  35. UN. Black Sea Grain Initiative, Joint Coordination Centre. United Nations. n.d. https://www.un.org/en/black-sea-grain-initiative/background.
  36. IMO. Maritime Security and Safety in the Black Sea and Sea of Azov. International Maritime Organization. 2023. https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/MaritimeSecurityandSafetyintheBlackSeaandSeaofAzov.aspx.
  37. IMO. Summary of decisions. IMO Council 35th extraordinary session. C/ES.35/D. 29 March 2022. IMO, London.
  38. ITF Seafarers’ Trust. War in Ukraine: Seafarers & Families, 2023. https://www.seafarerstrust.org/what-we-do/ukraine-seafarers-families.
  39. Tsiakaraki K. Ukrainian seafarers now back in labour force. Safety4Sea. 2023, February 21. https://safety4sea.com/ukrainian-seafarers-now-back-in-labour-force/.
  40. Alvarez Jr. The psychological impact of piracy: incidence of physical symptoms suggestive of posttraumatic stress disorder in seafarers. Ashford University ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. ; 2020: 27832811.
  41. Seyle D, Fernandez K, Dimitrevich A, et al. The long-term impact of maritime piracy on seafarers’ behavioral health and work decisions. Marine Policy. 2018; 87: 23–28.
  42. Van Wijk CH. Dispositional resilience predicts psychological adaptation of seafarers during and after maritime operations. Int Marit Health. 2023; 74(1): 45–53.
  43. Janssen W, Jensen HJ, Harth V, et al. Systematic Review: Measurement Methods and Concept of Resilience Among Seafarers. Inquiry. 2024; 61: 469580231221288.