Vol 95, No 2 (2024)
Research paper
Published online: 2023-10-10

open access

Page views 477
Article views/downloads 372
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α gene polymorphisms in preeclampsia: a case-control study in a Mexican population

Carlos Ernesto Mora Palazuelos1, Elsa Maribel Aguilar Medina1, Mariana Melisa Avendaño Felix1, Rosalio Ramos Payán1, Mercedes Bermudez Cortez2, Leticia Lara Avila1, Adrian Herrera Salazar1, Joel Murillo Llanes3, Guzmán Sanchez-Schmitz4, Jose Geovanni Romero Quintana1
Pubmed: 37842994
Ginekol Pol 2024;95(2):108-113.

Abstract

Objectives: We focused our study on examining the genotype and allele frequency of IL-6 (rs1800795), TNF-α (rs1800629) and IL-10 (rs1800872) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) on preeclampsia (PE) diagnosed Mexican pregnant women. Material and methods: A case-control study was designed including 86 preeclampsia patients and 100 normotensives pregnancies from Women’s Hospital of Culiacan, Mexico. Genotyping of IL-6, TNF-α and IL-10 was performed using TaqMan SNP Genotyping. Results: Not significant association was found between development of PE and genotypic (p > 0.05) and allelic (p > 0.05) frequencies of IL-6, TNF-α and IL-10 SNPs. Genotype distributions of IL-6 (p = 0.599), TNF-α (p = 0.721) and IL-10 (p = 0.761) polymorphisms in the two groups were in agreement with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Conclusions: According to the findings, the IL-6, TNF-α and IL-10 SNPs are not exponents of susceptibility to developing PE.

ORIGINAL PAPER / OBSTETRICS

Ginekologia Polska

2024, vol. 95, no. 2, 108–113

Copyright © 2024 PTGiP

ISSN 0017–0011, e-ISSN 2543–6767

DOI 10.5603/gpl.94272

IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α gene polymorphisms in preeclampsia: a case-control study in a Mexican population

Carlos Ernesto Mora Palazuelos1Elsa Maribel Aguilar Medina1Mariana Melisa Avendaño Felix1Rosalio Ramos Payan1Mercedes Bermudez Cortes2Leticia Lara Avila1Adrian Herrera Salazar1Joel Murillo Llanes3Guzman Sanchez-Schmitz4Jose Geovanni Romero Quintana1
1Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Blvd. Miguel Tamayo Espinosa de los Monteros s/n, Torre de Rectoría Col. Desarrollo Urbano Tres Ríos, Culiacan, Mexico
2Autonomous University of Chihuahua, Mexico
3Hospital de la Mujer, Culiacán, Mexico
4Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

Corresponding author:

Jose Geovanni Romero-Quintana

Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Blvd. Miguel Tamayo Espinosa de los Monteros s/n, Torre de Rectoría Col. Desarrollo Urbano Tres Ríos, 80050 Culiacan, Mexico

e-mail: geovanniromero@uas.edu.mx

Received: 18.02.2023 Accepted: 7.08.2023 Early publication date: 10.10.2023

This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.

ABSTRACT
Objectives: We focused our study on examining the genotype and allele frequency of IL-6 (rs1800795), TNF-α (rs1800629) and IL-10 (rs1800872) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) on preeclampsia (PE) diagnosed Mexican pregnant women.
Material and methods: A case-control study was designed including 86 preeclampsia patients and 100 normotensives pregnancies from Women’s Hospital of Culiacan, Mexico. Genotyping of IL-6, TNF-α and IL-10 was performed using TaqMan SNP Genotyping.
Results: Not significant association was found between development of PE and genotypic (p > 0.05) and allelic (p > 0.05) frequencies of IL-6, TNF-α and IL-10 SNPs. Genotype distributions of IL-6 (p = 0.599), TNF-α (p = 0.721) and IL-10 (p = 0.761) polymorphisms in the two groups were in agreement with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.
Conclusions: According to the findings, the IL-6, TNF-α and IL-10 SNPs are not exponents of susceptibility to developing PE.
Keywords: IL-6; IL-10; TNF-α; preeclampsia; SNP
Ginekologia Polska 2024; 95, 2: 108113

INTRODUCTION

Preeclampsia (PE) is a syndrome that affects women during pregnancy and delivery by increasing arterial pressure and, in some cases, multiorgan affectations. Daily, this complication is responsible for the death of approximately 830 women worldwide, [1] with 75% of maternal mortality being related to preeclampsia (PE). This syndrome affects between 2 and 8% of pregnancies and characterizes by a new-onset hypertension (> 140/90 mmHg) in the second half of pregnancy, coexisting with either proteinuria (> 300 mg/24 h) or multi-organ (kidney and liver failure) dysfunctions, neurological complications, thrombocytopenia and/or hemolysis [2]. For the newborn, PE has been associated with intrauterine growth restriction, neonatal hard breading syndrome, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and other complications [3].

The etiology of PE is still unknown. Predisposition to PE is likely multifactorial and polygenic. Preeclampsia had been previously associated with dysregulation of several gene and biological pathways in the basis of inflammation and remodeling activities, such as regulation of actin cytoskeleton [4]. Moreover, there are several studies that investigated the role of mutated genes, such as AGT, ACE, AGTR1, AGTR2, TNF, that exert implications in PE pathological processes, such as coagulation, vascular resistance, and metabolism, as well as inflammatory processes [5–7], of which 3035% are attributed to maternal genotype, 20% fetal, 13% to the couple, and the rest to other effects [8].

It is believed that PE results from defective spiral artery remodeling, which leads to an imbalance between anti- and pro-angiogenic factors, resulting in a hypo-perfused placenta and the release of placental-derived factors causing maternal widespread endothelial dysfunction and organic failure. The main cause of the abnormal placentation remains unclear, but genetic, environmental, and immunological factors have been studied [9]. For instance, there is evidence supporting that both innate and adaptive immune responses participate in the pathogenesis of PE, suggesting that Th1 immunity is responsible for poor placentation and exacerbated inflammatory response and endothelial dysfunction seen in PE [10]. Preeclampsia has been associated with chronic immune activation that leads to an increased production of inflammatory cytokines by pro-inflammatory T cells, and a decrease in regulatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, which further promotes an inflammatory state during PE [11].

Th1/Th2 cytokine balance is important to maintain the success of normal pregnancy. In normal pregnancy, the production of Th1 cytokine is inhibited, and their overexpression predisposes to PE development. In this regard, interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a Th2, multifunctional pleiotropic pro-inflammatory cytokine and plays a central role in the regulation of immune responses [12]. IL-6 represents one of the main mediators of the acute phase, stimulates T lymphocytes, induces the production of C reactive protein, and regulates the production of human chorionic gonadotropin. It also maintains the pregnancy through an immunosuppressive effect, although its expression is elevated during delivery. IL-6 plays an important role in trophoblastic proliferation, invasion and differentiation, and increased levels of this cytokine have been reported in PE pregnancy [13]. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is a Th1-polarizing pro-inflammatory cytokine implicated in maternal endothelial dysfunction leading to PE, impairing placental formation, and deregulating the balance of vasodilatation and vasoconstriction present in maternal circulation [14]. Even more, both IL-6 and TNF-α have been found elevated in Latin-American preeclamptic patients [15]. In contrast, IL-10 is a potent immunosuppressive cytokine, which has been considered a key modulator of immune tolerance at maternal-fetal communication promoting successful placentation, controlling inflammation, and regulating vascular function. In this case, decreased levels of IL-10 in placenta tissues and serum samples have been associated to PE [16].

Previously, cytokine gene alterations, such as single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs), had been related to physiopathology in some inflammatory and obstetric complications. In this regard, SNPs in the proximal and distal region of IL-10 promoter (−1082 A/G, −819 T/C y −592 A/C) [17] are known to work as transcriptional regulators. −1082 A/G has been related to lower IL-10 production [18], higher risk of PE [19] and early PE onset in an Indian population [20]. Additionally, −819 T/G has been associated with lower IL-10 production [20], higher risk of PE in a Chinese population [21] and early onset PE on Indians [20]. Other studies have associated −592A/C SNP with lower IL-10 production [22] and increased risk for PE in an Iranian population [23]. For TNF-α, evidence suggest an association between the transcriptional regulation of SNPs in its promoter region (−308 G/A, −238G/A) [24] and high levels of TNF-α in PE [25]. In contrast, IL-6 SNPs have yet to be associated with PE.

Considering this, we decided to explore the association between PE and some relevant cytokine SNPs for IL-6 (rs1800795), TNF-α (rs1800629) and IL-10 (rs1800872), in Mexican population. In that respect, the relevance of this investigation relies on the necessity for understanding the roles of genetic variants and their participation on inflammatory processes of PE.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study participants

Written informed consent was obtained from all indivi­dual participants included in the study. To calculate the size of the samples of interest, the formula was used to estimate the proportion of cases and controls with a power of 80%, significance level of p0.05, and a loss value of the samples of 5% calculated a sample size of 86 individuals per group, for this reason, 186 pregnancies included in our case-control study, 100 normotensives with no complications and 86 PE patients. Biological samples and corresponding clinical data were collected from May 2018 to December 2019.

DNA isolation

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) isolate was performed using whole blood sample with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) anticoagulant following Gustincich protocol [26]. Deoxyribonucleic acid samples were quantified using NanoDrop One (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and their integrity was verified in 1.5% agarose gels electrophoresis.

TaqMan genotyping assays

Real-time PCR was performed using TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for the following SNPs: IL-6 (rs1800795, −237C>G, assay ID C__1839697_20. Applied Biosystems, CA, USA), TNF-α (rs1800629, −488G>A, assay ID C__7514879_10. Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) and IL-10 (rs1800872, −627T>G, assay ID C__1747363_10. Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The mixtures were incubated at 60°C for 30 s, then 95°C 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min, and finally post read at 60°C for 30 s. Automated genotype cal­ling was done using the TaqMan Genotyper Software v1.3.

Database analysis

Different databases such as dbSNP by National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/), the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) (https://www.pagestudy.org/) and SNPedia (https://www.snpedia.com/) were used to investigate variant details, clinical significance, and frequency of SNPs in the study.

Statistical analysis

Data was presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and frequencies. Differences in allelic and genotypic frequencies were evaluated using Pearson’s Chi-squared test. SNPs associations were tested under dominant and recessive genetic models and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as the measure of association between specific alleles and genotypes with PE and its clinical subtypes. Hardy-Weinberg’s equilibrium was calculated by Chi-squared test for all genotypic combinations of each SNP in patients and controls. PASW v20.0 (SPSS inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software package was used for analysis.

RESULTS

Table 1 summarizes the clinical characteristics of the study subjects. The mean of age of cases were similar to that of the control group (24.8 ± 6.4 vs 24.7 ± 7.2 years, respectively). Differences in the means of weight at last trimester of the groups studied were observed, 83.4 + 18.1 kg for cases, and 74.4 + 13.1 kg for the control group, with evident statistical differences (p < 0.001). These results impacted in body mass index (BMI) which were 27 + 6.4 vs 25.2 + 5.3 kg/m2 for cases and control groups, respectively, presenting a statistical significance (p = 0.041). Cases showed higher blood pressure than the control group, in both systolic (144 + 16 vs 115 + 14 mmHg; p < 0.001) and diastolic (94 + 10 vs 74 + 9 mmHg; p < 0.001) measures. Interestingly, we found that 72.9% (62) of the total cases of newborns were at term and, there were no significant statistics between preterm birth and PE (p = 0.659). In the case of urinary protein, levels were higher in case groups than in the control group (1248.2 + 1863.1 vs 257.3 + 119.7 mg/24 h) observing statistical differences (p < 0.001). Finally, the platelets were observed to have statistical differences as well (211.7 + 79.5 vs 237 + 69.7 103/mm3 for cases and controls, respectively; p = 0.025).

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of cases and controls groups [mean ± standard deviation (SD)]

Variable

Cases n = 86

Controls n = 100

p value

Age [years]a

24.8 ± 6.4

24.7 ± 7.2

0.665

Weight last trimester [kg]b

83.4 ± 18.1

74.4 ± 13.1

< 0.001

BMI [kg/m2]b

27.0 ± 6.4

25.2 ± 5.3

0.041

Systolic BP [mmHg]a

144 ± 16

115 ± 14

< 0.001

Diastolic BP [mmHg]a

94 ± 10

74 ± 9

< 0.001

Weeks at deliverya

37.6 ± 2.1

37.3 ± 3.5

0.731

Newborn birth weight [kg]b

3.0 ± 0.8

3.1 ± 0.6

0.804

Size of newborn [cm]a

49.6 ± 3.0

49.0 ± 3.9

0.367

24-h urinary protein [mg/24 h]a

1248.2 ± 1863.1

257.3 ± 119.7

< 0.001

Urea [mg/dL]a

17.3 ± 6.8

17.1 ± 7.7

0.829

Creatinine [mg/dL]a

0.7 ± 1.6

0.7 ± 0.4

0.785

Platelets [103/mm3]b

211.7 ± 79.5

237 ± 69.7

0.025

CRP [mg/dL]a

2.8 ± 5.0

5.0 ± 8.8

0.254

LDL cholesterol [mg/dL]b

134.5 ± 55.9

193.0

0.550

AST [U/L]a

25.1 ± 10.8

28.0 ± 10.4

0.284

ALT [U/L]a

25.7 ± 18.3

26.6 ± 14.4

0.831

aMann-Whitney U statistical model; bt-student statistical model; BMI — body mass index; BP — blood pressure; CRP — C-reactive protein; LDL cholesterol — low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; ALT — alanine aminotransferase; AST — aspartate aminotransferase

Table 2 shows the distribution of genotypes and allele frequencies of IL-6 (−237C>G), TNF-α (−488G>A), and IL-10 (−627T>G) for the preeclamptic and normotensive patients. All frequencies for the three SNPs were similar between cases and controls (p > 0.05). Moreover, genotype distributions of IL-6 — (p = 0.599), TNF-α (p = 0.721) and IL-10 (p = 0.761) SNPs in the groups were in agreement with HardyWeinberg equilibrium.

Table 2. Gene and allele frequencies of IL-6, TNF-α and IL-10

Genotype frequencies

Allele frequencies

NH

# [%]

HT

# [%]

MH

# [%]

Total

# [%]

p valuea

A

# [%]

a

# [%]

Total

# [%]

p valuea

IL-6 (-237C>G)

Cases

2

(2.3)

26

(30.2)

58

(67.4)

86

(100)

0.969

30

(17.4)

142

(82.6)

172

(100)

0.890

Controls

2

(2.0)

29

(29.0)

69

(69.0)

100

(100)

33

(16.5)

167

(83.5)

200

(100)

TNF-α (-488G>A)

Cases

73

(84.9)

13

(15.1)

0

(0)

86

(100)

0.649

159

(92.4)

13

(7.6)

172

(100)

0.849

Controls

84

(84.0)

15

(15.0)

1

(1.0)

100

(100)

183

(91.5)

17

(8.5)

200

(100)

IL-10 (-627T>G)

Cases

16

(18.6)

37

(43.0)

33

(38.4)

86

(100)

0.573

69

(40.1)

103

(59.9)

172

(100)

0.347

Controls

21

(21.0)

48

(48.0)

31

(31.0)

100

(100)

90

(45.0)

110

(55.0)

200

(100)

aPearson’s Chi-squared test; NH — normal homozygous; HT — heterozygous; MH — mutated homozygous

Interestingly, our allele frequencies results are similar to those reported in dbSNP by NCBI for Mexican (IL-6 and TNF-α) and Latin American population (IL-10), where IL-6 (−237C>G) shows allelic frequencies as follow A: 15% vs a: 85%, TNF-α (−488G>A) A: 93% vs a: 7% and IL-10 (−627T>G) A: 30% vs a: 70%.

DISCUSSION

As expected, in the case group, significant statistical differences were observed in the last trimester of pregnancy in the mother’s weight, BMI, blood pressure, urine protein content, and platelets, in comparison to control group, as reported in most studies.

The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia has been the object of recent studies. In this regard, a study described elevated levels of inflammatory markers such as TNF-α, IL-6, and C-reactive protein in preeclamptic patients and demonstrated that Latin-American women present a higher degree of inflammation than women from developed countries [15]. Interestingly, the induction of both IL-6 and TNF-α in these PE patients was attributed to chronic subclinical infections and insulin resistance [15]. The IL-6 (rs1800795) SNP has been associated with diseases such like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, higher risk of death after an acute coronary syndrome and atherosclerosis [27]. As with our observations, IL-6 (−237C>G) SNP studied in other populations [28] have shown not association with PE (p = 0.969).

A study genotyped 503 tagSNPs in 40 genes related to inflammation on a cohort of pregnant African American mothers finding no association between IL-6 and PE; the same study found gene-level association of an upstream regulator of TNF-α with PE among European Americans. Their conclusion was that despite previous studies have suggested null associations, increased tagging and stratification by genetic ancestry suggests important association between TNF-α regulator and PE among European Americans [29]. TNF-α (rs1800629) SNP has been associated with some conditions such as acute kidney allograft rejection and acute myocardial infarction. Specifically, this SNP has been associated with PE in Turkish, Iranian, and Finnish populations [23, 30]. In line with previous reports [31, 32], our study did not find an association between PE and TNF-α (488G>A) polymorphism (p = 0.649); perhaps not surprisingly considering the native-American genetic ancestry of our Mexican cohort.

The IL-10 (rs1800872) SNP has been associated with some diseases as squamous intraepithelial cervical lesions and PE, among others [33]. Our data did not find an association between PE and IL-10 (−627T>G) polymorphism (p = 0.573), agreeing with previous reports in Japanese and Iranian populations [34, 35]. Nevertheless, some studies show different results in the Chinese and Iranian population [13, 36]. Another study investigating association between PE and cytokine gene polymorphisms in Brazilian Mulatto women from the northeastern region of Brazil found no difference in genotype or allelic frequencies for TNF-α promoter (−308 G>A), IL6 promoter (−174 G>C), IFN-gamma intron 1 (+874 A>T), IL10 promoters (−1082 A>G), (−819 C>T) and (−592 C>A) and TGF-beta1 codon 10 (+869 T>C) and codon 25 (+915 G>C) [34].

It is well known that genetic variability between ethnic populations exists. While some SNPs may be more prevalent in some specific groups, contradictory reports on inflammatory cytokine SNPs associated to PE may also relate to unforeseen variables such as subclinical infections and chronic immune disorders. Of notice, while all pregnant women of our study were recruited in Culiacan city, a wide ethnic genetic diversity of our cohort was ensured by the fact that this hospital is the only concentrating Women Hospital in the public health systems across the entire state of Sinaloa, even receiving patients from neighboring states.

It is known that the up-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, TNF-α, and downregulation of anti-inflammatory IL-10, may increase inflammatory response in pregnancies, causing an exacerbated immune system response, contributing to abnormal placentation and consequent hypoperfused placenta, conditions that have been widely recognized in preeclampsia.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences of IL-6 (rs1800795), TNF-α (rs1800629) and IL-10 (rs1800872) in genotypes and allele frequencies of the SNPs between preeclamptic and normotensives patients, ruling out their participation in the disease of this population. Moreover, genotype distributions for IL-6, TNF-α and IL-10 SNPs in both groups were in agreement with HardyWeinberg equilibrium.

Article information and declarations
Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethics statement

All procedures performed in a study involving people comply with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national committee for research ethics and the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its subsequent changes or comparable ethical standards. Our study was approved by Human Research Committee of Women’s Hospital in Culiacan, Mexico (registry number #2018032).

Author contributions

CEMP: study design, data collection, DNA analysis and interpretation and drafting manuscript. MAM: study design, data collection, DNA analysis and interpretation and drafting manuscript. MMAF: DNA analysis. RRP: DNA analysis and interpretation and reviewer of the manuscript, GSS: DNA analysis and interpretation and reviewer of the manuscript, MBC: DNA analysis and interpretation, and reviewer of the manuscript, LLA: patient recruitment. AHS: patient recruitment. JMLI: patient recruitment and statistical analysis. JGRQ: study design, data collection, DNA analysis and interpretation, statistical analysis and drafting manuscript.

Acknowledgements

To the Women’s Hospital for all the facilities granted to development this research.

Funding

The authors acknowledge Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencia y Tecnología (CONAHCYT) for Mariana Avendaño-Félix (575985) fellowships. The authors acknowledge the Program for the Promotion and Support of Research Projects PROFAPI grant (UAS/248) for funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization. Maternal mortality. 2019.
  2. ACOG. Practice Bulletin No. 202: Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; 133(1): 1.
  3. Phipps EA, Thadhani R, Benzing T, et al. Pre-eclampsia: pathogenesis, novel diagnostics and therapies. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019; 15(5): 275–289, doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0119-6, indexed in Pubmed: 30792480.
  4. Kang JH, Song H, Yoon JAh, et al. Preeclampsia leads to dysregulation of various signaling pathways in placenta. J Hypertens. 2011; 29(5): 928–936, doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328344a82c, indexed in Pubmed: 21430563.
  5. Melton PE, Johnson MP, Gokhale-Agashe D, et al. Whole-exome sequencing in multiplex preeclampsia families identifies novel candidate susceptibility genes. J Hypertens. 2019; 37(5): 997–1011, doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002023, indexed in Pubmed: 30633125.
  6. Chappell S, Morgan L. Searching for genetic clues to the causes of pre-eclampsia. Clin Sci (Lond). 2006; 110(4): 443–458, doi: 10.1042/CS20050323, indexed in Pubmed: 16526948.
  7. Yong HEJ, Murthi P, Brennecke SP, et al. Genome-wide transcriptome directed pathway analysis of maternal pre-eclampsia susceptibility genes. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5): e0128230–72, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128230, indexed in Pubmed: 26010865.
  8. Burton GJ, Redman CW, Roberts JM, et al. Pre-eclampsia: pathophysiology and clinical implications. BMJ. 2019; 366: l2381, doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2381, indexed in Pubmed: 31307997.
  9. Hod T, Cerdeira AS, Karumanchi SA. Molecular Mechanisms of Preeclampsia. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015; 5(10), doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a023473, indexed in Pubmed: 26292986.
  10. Saito S, Shiozaki A, Nakashima A, et al. The role of the immune system in preeclampsia. Mol Aspects Med. 2007; 28(2): 192–209, doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2007.02.006, indexed in Pubmed: 17433431.
  11. Harmon AC, Cornelius DC, Amaral LM, et al. The role of inflammation in the pathology of preeclampsia. Clin Sci (Lond). 2016; 130(6): 409–419, doi: 10.1042/CS20150702, indexed in Pubmed: 26846579.
  12. Veisian M, Javaheri A, Amjadi N, et al. Association of IL-6 -176G > C Polymorphism with Susceptibility to Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2020; 39(6): 491–502, doi: 10.1080/15513815.2019.1675110, indexed in Pubmed: 31738646.
  13. Fan DM, Wang Y, Liu XL, et al. Polymorphisms in interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 may be associated with risk of preeclampsia. Genet Mol Res. 2017; 16(1), doi: 10.4238/gmr16018588, indexed in Pubmed: 28252161.
  14. Lau SY, Guild SJ, Barrett CJ, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 levels are altered in preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2013; 70(5): 412–427, doi: 10.1111/aji.12138, indexed in Pubmed: 23790133.
  15. López-Jaramillo P, Herrera JA, Arenas-Mantilla M, et al. Subclinical infection as a cause of inflammation in preeclampsia. Am J Ther. 2008; 15(4): 373–376, doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e318164c149, indexed in Pubmed: 18645342.
  16. Aggarwal R, Jain AK, Mittal P, et al. Association of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in preeclampsia. J Clin Lab Anal. 2019; 33(4): e22834, doi: 10.1002/jcla.22834, indexed in Pubmed: 30666720.
  17. D‘Alfonso S, Rampi M, Rolando V, et al. New polymorphisms in the IL-10 promoter region. Genes Immun. 2000; 1(3): 231–233, doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6363666, indexed in Pubmed: 11196718.
  18. Morgan L, Crawshaw S, Baker PN, et al. Functional and genetic studies of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor in pre-eclamptic and normotensive pregnant women. J Hypertens. 1997; 15(12 Pt 1): 1389–1396, doi: 10.1097/00004872-199715120-00004, indexed in Pubmed: 9431843.
  19. Vural P, Degirmencioglu S, Saral NY, et al. Tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 polymorphisms in preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010; 36(1): 64–71, doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01111.x, indexed in Pubmed: 20178529.
  20. Sowmya S, Sri Manjari K, Ramaiah A, et al. Interleukin 10 gene promoter polymorphisms in women with early-onset pre-eclampsia. Clin Exp Immunol. 2014; 178(2): 334–341, doi: 10.1111/cei.12402, indexed in Pubmed: 24962617.
  21. Liu QY, Gao FY, Liu XR, et al. Investigations into the association between polymorphisms in the interleukin-10 gene and risk of early-onset preeclampsia. Genet Mol Res. 2015; 14(4): 19323–19328, doi: 10.4238/2015.December.29.42, indexed in Pubmed: 26782585.
  22. Cheong JY, Cho SW, Hwang IlL, et al. Association between chronic hepatitis B virus infection and interleukin-10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene promoter polymorphisms. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 21(7): 1163–1169, doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04304.x, indexed in Pubmed: 16824070.
  23. Mirahmadian M, Kalantar F, Heidari G, et al. Association of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-10 gene polymorphisms in Iranian patients with pre-eclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2008; 60(2): 179–185, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2008.00610.x, indexed in Pubmed: 18705845.
  24. Abraham LJ, Kroeger KM. Impact of the -308 TNF promoter polymorphism on the transcriptional regulation of the TNF gene: relevance to disease. J Leukoc Biol. 1999; 66(4): 562–566, doi: 10.1002/jlb.66.4.562, indexed in Pubmed: 10534109.
  25. Mohajertehran F, Tavakkol Afshari J, Rezaieyazdi Z, et al. Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the human tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin 1-β genes in patients with pre-eclampsia. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012; 11(3): 224–229, indexed in Pubmed: 22947907.
  26. Gustincich S, Manfioletti G, Del Sal G, et al. A fast method for high-quality genomic DNA extraction from whole human blood. Biotechniques. 1991; 11(3): 298–300, 302, indexed in Pubmed: 1931026.
  27. Ahmadi A, Ghaedi H, Salimian J, et al. Association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and interleukins gene variants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cytokine. 2019; 117: 65–71, doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2019.02.003, indexed in Pubmed: 30826601.
  28. Valencia Villalvazo EY, Canto-Cetina T, Romero Arauz JF, et al. Analysis of polymorphisms in interleukin-10, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in Mexican-Mestizo women with pre-eclampsia. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2012; 16(11): 1263–1269, doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2012.0181, indexed in Pubmed: 23013217.
  29. Harmon QE, Engel SM, Wu MC, et al. Polymorphisms in inflammatory genes are associated with term small for gestational age and preeclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014; 71(5): 472–484, doi: 10.1111/aji.12241, indexed in Pubmed: 24702779.
  30. Saarela T, Hiltunen M, Helisalmi S, et al. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha gene haplotype is associated with pre-eclampsia. Mol Hum Reprod. 2005; 11(6): 437–440, doi: 10.1093/molehr/gah182, indexed in Pubmed: 15901845.
  31. Molvarec A, Jermendy A, Nagy B, et al. Association between tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha G-308A gene polymorphism and preeclampsia complicated by severe fetal growth restriction. Clin Chim Acta. 2008; 392(1–2): 52–57, doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2008.03.009, indexed in Pubmed: 18396154.
  32. Daher S, Sass N, Oliveira LG, et al. Cytokine genotyping in preeclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2006; 55(2): 130–135, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2005.00341.x, indexed in Pubmed: 16433832.
  33. Torres-Poveda K, Burguete-García AI, Cruz M, et al. The SNP at -592 of human IL-10 gene is associated with serum IL-10 levels and increased risk for human papillomavirus cervical lesion development. Infect Agent Cancer. 2012; 7(1): 32, doi: 10.1186/1750-9378-7-32, indexed in Pubmed: 23148667.
  34. de Lima TH, Sass N, Mattar R, et al. Cytokine gene polymorphisms in preeclampsia and eclampsia. Hypertens Res. 2009; 32(7): 565–569, doi: 10.1038/hr.2009.58, indexed in Pubmed: 19407822.
  35. Kamali-Sarvestani E, Kiany S, Gharesi-Fard B, et al. Association study of IL-10 and IFN-gamma gene polymorphisms in Iranian women with preeclampsia. J Reprod Immunol. 2006; 72(1-2): 118–126, doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2006.04.001, indexed in Pubmed: 16863661.
  36. Song L, Zhong M. Association between Interleukin-10 gene polymorphisms and risk of early-onset preeclampsia. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015; 8(9): 11659–11664, indexed in Pubmed: 26617906.