A comparison of pelvic organ prolapse and sexual function after abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy
Abstract
Objectives: Hysterectomy is one of the risk factors of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). There is no consensus on whether the route of hysterectomy affects the subsequent development of POP. The aim of the study was to assess POP and sexual function 1 year after a hysterectomy when comparing total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) with total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). The study applied the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) as the measure of POP and a short-form of the POP/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12).
Material and methods: All patients that underwent either TAH or TLH due to benign causes between March 2016 and March 2017 at the tertiary hospital used for the study were included in our prospective cohort study. POP-Q measurements and PISQ-12 scores were assessed 1 year postoperatively.
Results: We included 182 patients in the clinical examinations. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics between the TAH and TLH groups. Also, there we no differences observed in the objective POP measurements between the two study groups. Results of the two groups’ PISQ-12 scores were also similar. However, postoperative vaginal lengths were found to be significantly shorter in the patients who had undergone TAH compared with those who had undergone TLH.
Conclusions: TAH and TLH are comparable regarding short-term objective pelvic organ prolapse. Although we found
statistically a significant difference in vaginal lengths between the two groups, no clinical significance was found in terms of sexual function.
Keywords: hysterectomypelvic organ prolapsesexual function
References
- Lethaby A, Mukhopadhyay A, Naik R. Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012.
- Turner LC, Shepherd JP, Wang Li, et al. Hysterectomy surgery trends: a more accurate depiction of the last decade? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 208(4): 277.e1–277.e7.
- Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, et al. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110(5): 1091–1095.
- Miner PB. Economic and personal impact of fecal and urinary incontinence. Gastroenterology. 2004; 126(1 Suppl 1): S8–13.
- Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology and the American Urogynecologic Society. Practice Bulletin No. 176 Summary: Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129(4): 763–765.
- Blandon RE, Bharucha AE, Melton LJ, et al. Incidence of pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy: A population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197(6): 664.e1–664.e7.
- Dällenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Jacob S, et al. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110(3): 625–632.
- Lykke R, Løwenstein Ea, Blaakær J, et al. Hysterectomy technique and risk of pelvic organ prolapse repair: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017; 296(3): 527–531.
- Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, et al. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003; 14(3): 164–8; discussion 168.
- Bilgic Celik D, Beji NK, Yalcin O. Turkish adaptation of the short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12): a validation and reliability study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013; 32(8): 1068–1073.
- Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, et al. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) - a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. J Med Life. 2011; 4(1): 75–81.
- Andersen LL, Alling Møller LM, Gimbel HM. Objective comparison of subtotal vs. total abdominal hysterectomy regarding pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial with 14-year follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015; 193: 40–45.
- Thakar R, Ayers S, Clarkson P, et al. Outcomes after total versus subtotal abdominal hysterectomy. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(17): 1318–1325.
- Thakar R, Ayers S, Srivastava R, et al. Removing the cervix at hysterectomy: an unnecessary intervention? Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112(6): 1262–1269.
- De La Cruz JF, Myers EM, Geller EJ. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014; 21(6): 1010–1014.
- Ercan Ö, Özer A, Köstü B, et al. Comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function after abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016; 132(1): 39–41.
- Radosa JC, Meyberg-Solomayer G, Kastl C, et al. Influences of different hysterectomy techniques on patients' postoperative sexual function and quality of life. J Sex Med. 2014; 11(9): 2342–2350.
- Achtari C, Dwyer PL. Sexual function and pelvic floor disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005; 19(6): 993–1008; quiz A1.
- Thakar R, Sultan AH. Hysterectomy and pelvic organ dysfunction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005; 19(3): 403–418.
- Abdelmonem AM. Vaginal length and incidence of dyspareunia after total abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010; 151(2): 190–192.
