Tom 9, Nr 1 (2024)
Wytyczne / stanowisko ekspertów
Opublikowany online: 2024-06-11
Wyświetlenia strony 641
Wyświetlenia/pobrania artykułu 180
Pobierz cytowanie

Eksport do Mediów Społecznościowych

Eksport do Mediów Społecznościowych

Rekomendacje Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologów i Położników dotyczące postępowania w wypadku stwierdzenia w trakcie ciąży krótkiej szyjki macicy i niewydolności cieśniowo-szyjkowej

Katarzyna Kosińska-Kaczyńska1, Sebastian Kwiatkowski2, Robert Brawura-Biskupski-Samaha3, Hubert Huras4, Anna Scholz5, Magda Rybak-Krzyszkowska6, Jakub Kornacki7, Katarzyna Stefańska8, Maciej Socha9, Michał Lipa10, Andrzej Torbe11, Jarosław Kalinka12, Mirosław Wielgoś13, Krzysztof Czajkowski14, Małgorzata Świątkowska-Freund15, Grzegorz Bręborowicz16, Mariusz Grzesiak17, Krzysztof Preis15, Ewa Wender-Ożegowska18, Bożena Leszczyńska-Gorzelak19, Piotr Sieroszewski20
Ginekologia i Perinatologia Praktyczna 2024;9(1):13-25.

Streszczenie

Brak

Artykuł dostępny w formacie PDF

Dodaj do koszyka: 49,00 PLN

Posiadasz dostęp do tego artykułu?

Referencje

  1. Lidegaard O. Cervical incompetence and cerclage in Denmark 1980-1990. A register based epidemiological survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994; 73(1): 35–38.
  2. Drakeley AJ, Roberts D, Alfirevic Z. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing pregnancy loss in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; 2003(1): CD003253.
  3. Feigenbaum SL, Crites Y, Hararah MK, et al. Prevalence of cervical insufficiency in polycystic ovarian syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(9): 2837–2842.
  4. Mangan CE, Borow L, Burtnett-Rubin MM, et al. Pregnancy outcome in 98 women exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero, their mothers, and unexposed siblings. Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 59(3): 315–319.
  5. Lee SiE, Romero R, Park CW, et al. The frequency and significance of intraamniotic inflammation in patients with cervical insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198(6): 633.e1–633.e8.
  6. Celik E, To M, Gajewska K, et al. Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group. Cervical length and obstetric history predict spontaneous preterm birth: development and validation of a model to provide individualized risk assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 31(5): 549–554.
  7. Domin CM, Smith EJ, Terplan M. Transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length as a predictor of preterm birth: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Ultrasound Q. 2010; 26(4): 241–248.
  8. To MS, Skentou C, Cicero S, et al. Cervical assessment at the routine 23-weeks' scan: problems with transabdominal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 15(4): 292–296.
  9. Bujold E, Pasquier JC, Simoneau J, et al. Intra-amniotic sludge, short cervix, and risk of preterm delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006; 28(3): 198–202.
  10. Grobman WA, Gilbert SA, Iams JD, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network*. Activity restriction among women with a short cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121(6): 1181–1186.
  11. Sosa CG, Althabe F, Belizán JM, et al. Bed rest in singleton pregnancies for preventing preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 2015(3): CD003581.
  12. Dodd JM, Jones L, Flenady V, et al. Prenatal administration of progesterone for preventing preterm birth in women considered to be at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013(7): CD004947.
  13. Romero R, Conde-Agudelo A, Fonseca EDa, et al. Vaginal Progesterone for Preventing Preterm Birth and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Singleton Gestations With a Short Cervix: A Meta-Analysis of Patient Data. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest. 2018; 38(4): 220–221.
  14. Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R. Vaginal progesterone does not prevent recurrent preterm birth in women with a singleton gestation, a history of spontaneous preterm birth, and a midtrimester cervical length >25 mm. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 227(6): 923–926.
  15. Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Fonseca EDa, et al. Vaginal Progesterone Is as Effective as Cervical Cerclage to Prevent Preterm Birth in Women With a Singleton Gestation, Previous Spontaneous Preterm Birth, and a Short Cervix: Updated Indirect Comparison Meta-analysis. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2018; 73(12): 674–676.
  16. Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Nicolaides K. Cervical Pessary to Prevent Preterm Birth in Asymptomatic High-Risk Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2020; 75(12): 725–727.
  17. Xiong YQ, Tan J, Liu YM, et al. Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in singletons and twin pregnancies: an update systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35(1): 100–109.
  18. Hoffman M, Clifton R, Biggio J, et al. Cervical Pessary for Prevention of Preterm Birth in Individuals With a Short Cervix: The TOPS Randomized Clinical Trial. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2024; 79(1): 19–22.
  19. Kosinska-Kaczynska K, Bomba-Opon D, Zygula A, et al. Adjunctive Pessary Therapy after Emergency Cervical Cerclage for Cervical Insufficiency with Protruding Fetal Membranes in the Second Trimester of Pregnancy: A Novel Modification of Treatment. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015: 185371.
  20. Ples L, Sima RM, Ricu A, et al. The efficacy of cervical cerclage combined with a pessary for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021; 34(15): 2535–2539.
  21. Simcox R, Seed PT, Bennett P, et al. A randomized controlled trial of cervical scanning vs history to determine cerclage in women at high risk of preterm birth (CIRCLE trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 200(6): 623.e1–623.e6.
  22. Brown R, Gagnon R, Delisle MF. No. 373-Cervical Insufficiency and Cervical Cerclage. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019; 41(2): 233–247.
  23. Harpham ME, Algert CS, Roberts CL, et al. Cervical cerclage placed before 14 weeks gestation in women with one previous midtrimester loss: A population-based cohort study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017; 57(6): 593–598.
  24. Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Medley N. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 6(6): CD008991.
  25. Owen J, Hankins G, Iams JD, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201(4): 375.e1–375.e8.
  26. Berghella V, Rafael TJ, Szychowski JM, et al. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117(3): 663–671.
  27. Berghella V, Ciardulli A, Rust OA, et al. Cerclage for sonographic short cervix in singleton gestations without prior spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using individual patient-level data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 50(5): 569–577.
  28. Guzman ER, Mellon C, Vintzileos AM, et al. Longitudinal assessment of endocervical canal length between 15 and 24 weeks' gestation in women at risk for pregnancy loss or preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 92(1): 31–37.
  29. Vousden N, Hezelgrave N, Carter J, et al. Prior ultrasound-indicated cerclage: how should we manage the next pregnancy? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015; 188: 129–132.
  30. Berghella V, Mackeen AD. Cervical length screening with ultrasound-indicated cerclage compared with history-indicated cerclage for prevention of preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118(1): 148–155.
  31. Ehsanipoor RM, Seligman NS, Saccone G, et al. Physical Examination-Indicated Cerclage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126(1): 125–135.
  32. Aubin AM, McAuliffe L, Williams K, et al. Combined vaginal progesterone and cervical cerclage in the prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023; 5(8): 101024.
  33. Shingleton E, Suff N. The relationship between high vaginal swab cultures and preterm birth in women with cervical cerclage. The 27th World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology & Infertility. Published online. ; 2019.
  34. Stupin JH, David M, Siedentopf JP, et al. Emergency cerclage versus bed rest for amniotic sac prolapse before 27 gestational weeks. A retrospective, comparative study of 161 women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008; 139(1): 32–37.
  35. Bujold E, Morency AM, Rallu F, et al. Bacteriology of amniotic fluid in women with suspected cervical insufficiency. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008; 30(10): 882–887.
  36. Hatanaka AR, Franca MS, Hamamoto TE, et al. Antibiotic treatment for patients with amniotic fluid "sludge" to prevent spontaneous preterm birth: A historically controlled observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019; 98(9): 1157–1163.
  37. Oh KJ, Romero R, Park JY, et al. Evidence that antibiotic administration is effective in the treatment of a subset of patients with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation presenting with cervical insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 221(2): 140.e1–140.e18.
  38. Shennan A, Chandiramani M, Bennett P, et al. MAVRIC: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of transabdominal vs transvaginal cervical cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 222(3): 261.e1–261.e9.
  39. Debbs RH, DeLa Vega GA, Pearson S, et al. Transabdominal cerclage after comprehensive evaluation of women with previous unsuccessful transvaginal cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197(3): 317.e1–317.e4.
  40. Fick AL, Caughey AB, Parer JT. Transabdominal cerclage: can we predict who fails? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007; 20(1): 63–67.
  41. Foster TL, Moore ES, Sumners JE. Operative complications and fetal morbidity encountered in 300 prophylactic transabdominal cervical cerclage procedures by one obstetric surgeon. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011; 31(8): 713–717.
  42. Moawad GN, Tyan P, Bracke T, et al. Systematic Review of Transabdominal Cerclage Placed via Laparoscopy for the Prevention of Preterm Birth. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018; 25(2): 277–286.
  43. Berghella V, Odibo AO, To MS, et al. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106(1): 181–189.
  44. Kosińska-Kaczyńska K, Szymusik I, Bomba-Opoń D, et al. Perinatal outcome according to chorionicity in twins - a Polish multicenter study. Ginekol Pol. 2016; 87(5): 384–389.
  45. Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Rehal A, et al. Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 229(6): 599–616.e3.
  46. Li C, Shen J, Hua K. Cerclage for women with twin pregnancies: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220(6): 543–557.e1.
  47. Roman A, Zork N, Haeri S, et al. Physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 223(6): 902.e1–902.e11.
  48. Giraldo-Isaza MA, Berghella V. Cervical cerclage and preterm PROM. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 54(2): 313–320.
  49. Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, Hummel P, et al. Final results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185(5): 1106–1112.
  50. Smith J, DeFranco EA. Tocolytics used as adjunctive therapy at the time of cerclage placement: a systematic review. J Perinatol. 2015; 35(8): 561–565.
  51. MCDONALD IA. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1957; 64(3): 346–350.
  52. Shirodkar V. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortions in the second trimester of pregnancy. Antiseptic. 1955; 52: 299–300.
  53. Odibo AO, Berghella V, To MS, et al. Shirodkar versus McDonald cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervical length. Am J Perinatol. 2007; 24(1): 55–60.
  54. Childress K, Dickert E, Flick A, et al. A Comparison of Mersilene Suture to Other Non-Absorbable Suture in Cervical Cerclage [10H]. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016; 127(Supplement 1).
  55. Clark NV, Einarsson JI. Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: a highly effective option for refractory cervical insufficiency. Fertil Steril. 2020; 113(4): 717–722.
  56. Chandiramani M, Chappell L, Radford S, et al. Successful pregnancy following mid-trimester evacuation through a transabdominal cervical cerclage. BMJ Case Rep. 2011; 2011.
  57. Carter JF, Savage A, Soper DE. Laparoscopic removal of abdominal cerclage at 19 weeks' gestation. JSLS. 2013; 17(1): 161–163.



Ginekologia i Perinatologia Praktyczna