open access

Vol 82, No 1 (2023)
Original article
Submitted: 2021-07-05
Accepted: 2021-10-27
Published online: 2021-11-16
Get Citation

Evaluation of the angulation of the nasal septum deviation as an anatomical variation for increased frequency of antral pseudocyst: a cone-beam computed tomography study

N. Laçin1, M. Yalçın2, M. Demirkol3
·
Pubmed: 34826132
·
Folia Morphol 2023;82(1):158-165.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Türkiye
  2. Ministry of Health, Istanbul, Türkiye
  3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Türkiye

open access

Vol 82, No 1 (2023)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Submitted: 2021-07-05
Accepted: 2021-10-27
Published online: 2021-11-16

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to determine whether degree of the nasal septum deviation (NSD) can affect the frequency of antral pseudocyst (AP) formation by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Materials and methods: This retrospective study was included 466 CBCT images. The NSD were categorised into four groups according to the degree: control group (no NSD, 0°–2°), group A (2°–9°), group B (9°–15°), and group C (≥ 15°). The predictor variables were demographic factors (patient’s age and gender) and anatomic factors (different degrees of nasal septum angulation). The outcome variable was presence of AP.
Results: Of the 466 cases, 242 (51.9%) had no NSD, 66 (14.2%) had an angle of 2°–9°, 111 (23.8%) had an angle of 9°–15°, and 47 (10.1%) had an angle of over 15°. The prevalence of AP was 2.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37 to 3.03; p = 0.001) times higher in the presence of NSD. Significant increases in presence of AP occurred with NSD in group A (2.37 times higher; p = 0.003) and group B (2.07 times higher; p = 0.003) compared to control by univariate analysis.
Conclusions: Although there is no sufficient evidence to suggest that NSD is a definitive aetiological factor for AP development, our findings indicated that NSD increased the risk of AP formation.

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to determine whether degree of the nasal septum deviation (NSD) can affect the frequency of antral pseudocyst (AP) formation by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Materials and methods: This retrospective study was included 466 CBCT images. The NSD were categorised into four groups according to the degree: control group (no NSD, 0°–2°), group A (2°–9°), group B (9°–15°), and group C (≥ 15°). The predictor variables were demographic factors (patient’s age and gender) and anatomic factors (different degrees of nasal septum angulation). The outcome variable was presence of AP.
Results: Of the 466 cases, 242 (51.9%) had no NSD, 66 (14.2%) had an angle of 2°–9°, 111 (23.8%) had an angle of 9°–15°, and 47 (10.1%) had an angle of over 15°. The prevalence of AP was 2.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37 to 3.03; p = 0.001) times higher in the presence of NSD. Significant increases in presence of AP occurred with NSD in group A (2.37 times higher; p = 0.003) and group B (2.07 times higher; p = 0.003) compared to control by univariate analysis.
Conclusions: Although there is no sufficient evidence to suggest that NSD is a definitive aetiological factor for AP development, our findings indicated that NSD increased the risk of AP formation.

Get Citation

Keywords

nasal septum, deviation, antral pseudocyst

About this article
Title

Evaluation of the angulation of the nasal septum deviation as an anatomical variation for increased frequency of antral pseudocyst: a cone-beam computed tomography study

Journal

Folia Morphologica

Issue

Vol 82, No 1 (2023)

Article type

Original article

Pages

158-165

Published online

2021-11-16

Page views

3319

Article views/downloads

982

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2021.0127

Pubmed

34826132

Bibliographic record

Folia Morphol 2023;82(1):158-165.

Keywords

nasal septum
deviation
antral pseudocyst

Authors

N. Laçin
M. Yalçın
M. Demirkol

References (46)
  1. Allard RH, van der Kwast WA, van der Waal I. Mucosal antral cysts. Review of the literature and report of a radiographic survey. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981; 51(1): 2–9.
  2. Al-Rawi NH, Uthman AT, Abdulhameed E, et al. Concha bullosa, nasal septal deviation, and their impacts on maxillary sinus volume among Emirati people: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Imaging Sci Dent. 2019; 49(1): 45–51.
  3. Apuhan T, Yıldırım YS, Özaslan H. The developmental relation between adenoid tissue and paranasal sinus volumes in 3-dimensional computed tomography assessment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 144(6): 964–971.
  4. Ballanti F, Baldini A, Ranieri S, et al. Is there a correlation between nasal septum deviation and maxillary transversal deficiency? A retrospective study on prepubertal subjects. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 83: 109–112.
  5. Baumann I, Baumann H. A new classification of septal deviations. Rhinology. 2007; 45(3): 220–223.
  6. Benninger MS, Ferguson BJ, Hadley JA, et al. Adult chronic rhinosinusitis: definitions, diagnosis, epidemiology, and pathophysiology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003; 129(3 Suppl): S1–32.
  7. Carter LC, Calamel A, Haller A, et al. Seasonal variation in maxillary antral pseudocysts in a general clinic population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998; 27(1): 22–24.
  8. Casamassimo PS, Lilly GE. Mucosal cysts of the maxillary sinus: a clinical and radiographic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1980; 50(3): 282–286.
  9. Cerkes N. The crooked nose: principles of treatment. Aesthet Surg J. 2011; 31(2): 241–257.
  10. Collet S, Bertrand B, Cornu S, et al. Is septal deviation a risk factor for chronic sinusitis? Review of literature. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 2001; 55(4): 299–304.
  11. Cooper BC. Nasorespiratory function and orofacial development. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1989; 22(2): 413–441.
  12. de Carvalho AB, Ferreira Costa AL, Fuziy A, et al. Investigation on the relationship of dimensions of the maxillary sinus drainage system with the presence of sinusopathies: a cone beam computed tomography study. Arch Oral Biol. 2018; 94: 78–83.
  13. Delaney SW. Evolution of the septoplasty: maximizing functional and aesthetic outcomes in nasal surgery. MJ Otol. 2018; 1(1): 004.
  14. Elahi M, Frenkiel S. Septal deviation and chronic sinus disease. Am J Rhinol. 2018; 14(3): 175–180.
  15. Gencer ZK, Ozkırış M, Okur A, et al. The effect of nasal septal deviation on maxillary sinus volumes and development of maxillary sinusitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013; 270(12): 3069–3073.
  16. Giotakis EI, Weber RK. Cysts of the maxillary sinus: a literature review. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013; 3(9): 766–771.
  17. Gothberg KA, Little JW, King DR, et al. A clinical study of cysts arising from mucosa of the maxillary sinus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1976; 41(1): 52–58.
  18. Gregurić T, Baudoin T, Tomljenović D, et al. Relationship between nasal septal deformity, symptoms and disease severity in chronic rhinosinusitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 273(3): 671–677.
  19. Guyuron B, Uzzo C, Scull H. A practical classification of septonasal deviation and an effective guide to septal surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104(7): 2202–2209.
  20. Harar RPS, Chadha NK, Rogers G. Are maxillary mucosal cysts a manifestation of inflammatory sinus disease? J Laryngol Otol. 2007; 121(8): 751–754.
  21. Jang YJu, Myong NH, Park KH, et al. Mucociliary transport and histologic characteristics of the mucosa of deviated nasal septum. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002; 128(4): 421–424.
  22. Klein JC. Nasal respiratory function and craniofacial growth. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986; 112(8): 843–849.
  23. Kucybała I, Janik KA, Ciuk S, et al. Nasal septal deviation and concha bullosa: do they have an impact on maxillary sinus volumes and prevalence of maxillary sinusitis? Pol J Radiol. 2017; 82: 126–133.
  24. Lacin N, Tatar B. Evaluation of the frequency of mucous retention cysts in the maxillary sinus in a Turkish population using cone-beam computed tomography. Makara J Health Res. 2019; 23(2): 1.
  25. Lilly GE, Cutcher JL, Steiner M. Spherical shadows within the maxillary antrium. J Oral Med. 1968; 23(1): 19–21.
  26. Mafee MF, Valvassori GE, Becker M. Imaging of the Head and Neck. New York, Stuttgart, Thieme 2005.
  27. Meltzer EO, Hamilos DL, Hadley JA, et al. Rhinosinusitis: establishing definitions for clinical research and patient care. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004; 114(6 Suppl): 155–212.
  28. Myall RW, Eastep PB, Silver JG. Mucous retention cysts of the maxillary antrum. J Am Dent Assoc. 1974; 89(6): 1338–1342.
  29. Nunes CA, Guedes OA, Alencar AH, et al. Evaluation of periapical lesions and their association with maxillary sinus abnormalities on cone-beam computed tomographic images. J Endod. 2016; 42(1): 42–46.
  30. Orhan I, Ormeci T, Aydin S, et al. Morphometric analysis of the maxillary sinus in patients with nasal septum deviation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014; 271(4): 727–732.
  31. Orlandi RR. A systematic analysis of septal deviation associated with rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2010; 120(8): 1687–1695.
  32. Passàli D, Ferri R, Becchini G, et al. Alterations of nasal mucociliary transport in patients with hypertrophy of the inferior turbinates, deviations of the nasal septum and chronic sinusitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1999; 256(7): 335–337.
  33. Perloff JR, Gannon FH, Bolger WE, et al. Bone involvement in sinusitis: an apparent pathway for the spread of disease. Laryngoscope. 2000; 110(12): 2095–2099.
  34. Polat C, Dostbil Z. Evaluation of the nasal mucociliary transport rate by rhinoscintigraphy before and after surgery in patients with deviated nasal septum. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; 267(4): 529–535.
  35. Poorey VK, Gupta N. Endoscopic and computed tomographic evaluation of influence of nasal septal deviation on lateral wall of nose and its relation to sinus diseases. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 66(3): 330–335.
  36. Roblin DG, Eccles R. What, if any, is the value of septal surgery? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2002; 27(2): 77–80.
  37. Rodrigues C, Arruda J, Silva L, et al. Antral pseudocysts of the maxillary sinus: relationship between radiographic and clinical features. JORDI Journal of Oral Diagnosis. 2017; 2: 1–7.
  38. Rodrigues CD, Freire GF, Silva LB, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of mucous retention cysts in a Brazilian population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009; 38(7): 480–483.
  39. Ruprecht A, Batniji S, El-Neweihi E. Mucous retention cyst of the maxillary sinus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986; 62(6): 728–731.
  40. Shin SH, Heo WW. Effects of unilateral naris closure on the nasal and maxillary sinus mucosa in rabbit. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2005; 32(2): 139–143.
  41. Stallman JS, Lobo JN, Som PM. The incidence of concha bullosa and its relationship to nasal septal deviation and paranasal sinus disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004; 25(9): 1613–1618.
  42. Tawakir K, Yilmaz T, Surucu S, et al. Scanning electron microscopy of ciliae and saccharine test for ciliary function in septal deviations. Laryngoscope. 2006; 116(4): 586–590.
  43. van Egmond MM, Rovers MM, Hendriks CTM, et al. Effectiveness of septoplasty versus non-surgical management for nasal obstruction due to a deviated nasal septum in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015; 16: 500.
  44. Wang JH, Jang YJu, Lee BJ. Natural course of retention cysts of the maxillary sinus: long-term follow-up results. Laryngoscope. 2007; 117(2): 341–344.
  45. Yalçın M, Laçin N. Is the relationship of maxillary molar roots to the floor of the maxillary sinus associated with antral pseudocysts? A retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020; 130(5): 574–582.
  46. Yasan H, Doğru H, Baykal B, et al. What is the relationship between chronic sinus disease and isolated nasal septal deviation? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 133(2): 190–193.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, faks: +48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl