open access

Ahead of Print
Case report
Published online: 2020-07-09
Submitted: 2020-05-07
Accepted: 2020-06-16
Get Citation

Anatomical traps for arteriovenous fistula creation

Z. M. Ziętek
DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2020.0076
·
Pubmed: 32644181

open access

Ahead of Print
CASE REPORTS
Published online: 2020-07-09
Submitted: 2020-05-07
Accepted: 2020-06-16

Abstract

Background: The risk of complications in undisclosed vascular variability appears relatively likely. Therefore, it is important to assess the probability of encountering anatomical-topographic variability in the venous system of the upper limb.  The catalog of patterns of the upper limb venous system seems to be unlimited and should therefore be constantly updated. The aim of the study was to explore of venous system of upper extremity and  discuss some  problems that would be encountered with the formation of an arteriovenous fistula.

Results: In 17 (85%) explored of upper limbs, the venous system shown a pattern similar to the reports already described. But in 3 of them (15%), the venous system showed a certain differences in relation to the accepted anatomical textbooks. Especially in one of them the anatomical variant of basilic and cephalic vein contrasted distinctly with the other veins. Based on the revealed anomalies, a statistical analysis of the probability of occurrence of any anatomical variant and the risk of complications associated with fistula creation was conducted. Even on such small group an assessed probability of anatomical variability of the upper limb venous system was statistically significant at p < 0.0244 (Odds Ratio - 0.0828; 95% CI: 0.0095 to 0.7252).

Conclusions: The probability of any anatomical-topographic variability in the venous system of the upper limb should be considered as a statistically significant. Only intense anatomical dissections would undoubtedly help to avoid some anatomical traps and then minimize some complications in the creation of arteriovenous fistulas.

Abstract

Background: The risk of complications in undisclosed vascular variability appears relatively likely. Therefore, it is important to assess the probability of encountering anatomical-topographic variability in the venous system of the upper limb.  The catalog of patterns of the upper limb venous system seems to be unlimited and should therefore be constantly updated. The aim of the study was to explore of venous system of upper extremity and  discuss some  problems that would be encountered with the formation of an arteriovenous fistula.

Results: In 17 (85%) explored of upper limbs, the venous system shown a pattern similar to the reports already described. But in 3 of them (15%), the venous system showed a certain differences in relation to the accepted anatomical textbooks. Especially in one of them the anatomical variant of basilic and cephalic vein contrasted distinctly with the other veins. Based on the revealed anomalies, a statistical analysis of the probability of occurrence of any anatomical variant and the risk of complications associated with fistula creation was conducted. Even on such small group an assessed probability of anatomical variability of the upper limb venous system was statistically significant at p < 0.0244 (Odds Ratio - 0.0828; 95% CI: 0.0095 to 0.7252).

Conclusions: The probability of any anatomical-topographic variability in the venous system of the upper limb should be considered as a statistically significant. Only intense anatomical dissections would undoubtedly help to avoid some anatomical traps and then minimize some complications in the creation of arteriovenous fistulas.

Get Citation

Keywords

veins, upper limb, anatomy variant, arteriovenous fistula, complications

About this article
Title

Anatomical traps for arteriovenous fistula creation

Journal

Folia Morphologica

Issue

Ahead of Print

Article type

Case report

Published online

2020-07-09

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2020.0076

Pubmed

32644181

Keywords

veins
upper limb
anatomy variant
arteriovenous fistula
complications

Authors

Z. M. Ziętek

References (18)
  1. Al-Jaishi AA, Liu AR, Lok CE, et al. Complications of the Arteriovenous Fistula: A Systematic Review. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017; 28(6): 1839–1850.
  2. Altıparmak B, Korkmaz Toker M, Uysal Aİ, et al. Double axillary vein variation diagnosed with ultrasound guidance during infraclavicular nerve block intervention. BMJ Case Rep. 2019; 12(1).
  3. Anaya-Ayala JE, Younes HK, Kaiser CL, et al. Prevalence of variant brachial-basilic vein anatomy and implications for vascular access planning. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 53(3): 720–724.
  4. Astor BC, Eustace JA, Powe NR, et al. Type of vascular access and survival among incident hemodialysis patients: the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for ESRD (CHOICE) Study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16(5): 1449–1455.
  5. Brescia MJ, Cimino JE, Appell K, et al. Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N Engl J Med. 1966; 275(20): 1089–1092.
  6. Fontaine C. Some help for literature study in anatomical variation reports. Surg Radiol Anat. 2001; 23(5): 293–294.
  7. Griffioen FMM, Drukker J, Hoogland PVJM, et al. General plan anatomy. Objectives of the teaching of anatomy/embryology in medical curricula in the netherlands. Eur J Morphol. 1999; 37(4-5): 288–325.
  8. Jones DG, Dias GJ, Mercer S, et al. Clinical anatomy research in a research-driven anatomy department. Clin Anat. 2002; 15(3): 228–232.
  9. Kaiser CL, Anaya-Ayala JE, Ismail N, et al. Unrecognized basilic vein variation leading to complication during basilic vein transposition arteriovenous fistula creation: case report and implications for access planning. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010; 39(5): 627–629.
  10. Lee H, Lee SH, Kim SJ, et al. The clinical anatomy of the cephalic vein in the deltopectoral triangle. Folia Morphol. 2008; 67: 72–77.
  11. Lemson MS, Tordoir JH, Daemen MJ, et al. Intimal hyperplasia in vascular grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000; 19(4): 336–350.
  12. Miller A, Hölzenbein TJ, Gottlieb MN, et al. Strategies to increase the use of autogenous arteriovenous fistula in end-stage renal disease. Ann Vasc Surg. 1997; 11(4): 397–405.
  13. Quinton W, Dillard D, Scribner BH, et al. Cannulation of blood vessels for prolonged hemodialysis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1960; 6(1): 104–113.
  14. Sadeghi A, Setayesh Mehr M, Esfandiari E, et al. Variation of the cephalic and basilic veins: A case report. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2017; 9(4): 232–234.
  15. Sandhu NPS, Sidhu DS. Mid-arm approach to basilic and cephalic vein cannulation using ultrasound guidance. Br J Anaesth. 2004; 93(2): 292–294.
  16. Sanudo JR, Vazquez R, Puerta J. Meaning and clinical interest of the anatomical variations in the 21st century. Eur J Anat. 2003; 7(S1): 1–3.
  17. Tellis VA, Veith FJ, Soberman RJ, et al. Internal arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1971; 132(5): 866–870.
  18. Wijeyaratne SM, Kannangara L. Safety and efficacy of electrospun polycarbonate-urethane vascular graft for early hemodialysis access: first clinical results in man. J Vasc Access. 2011; 12(1): 28–35.

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By  "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl