open access

Vol 80, No 2 (2021)
Original article
Submitted: 2020-01-10
Accepted: 2020-05-28
Published online: 2020-06-22
Get Citation

Types of left brachiocephalic vein aberrations detected during cardiac implantable electronic device implantation procedures

R. Steckiewicz1, P. Stolarz2, E. B. Świętoń1
·
Pubmed: 32639573
·
Folia Morphol 2021;80(2):317-323.
Affiliations
  1. 1st Department of Cardiology, Central University Hospital in Warsaw, Poland
  2. 1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland

open access

Vol 80, No 2 (2021)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Submitted: 2020-01-10
Accepted: 2020-05-28
Published online: 2020-06-22

Abstract

Background: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation procedures with transvenous lead placement afford an opportunity to observe vascular anatomic variations. The course of CIED implantation depends largely on morphometric and topographic characteristics of the relevant brachiocephalic vein (BCV), which is the left BCV in the case of lead insertion via the left clavipectoral triangle. This study aims to present left BCV anomalies arising from abnormal systemic vein embryogenesis and encountered during CIED implantation. Materials and methods: Venograms obtained during CIED implantation procedures and illustrating left BCV topography/morphometry were analysed retrospectively for two types of anomalies: anomalies of the left BCV itself (data from the period 2014–2018) and a combination of left BCV variations with a persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC); since the latter instances are rare, the analysed period was longer (2003–2018). Results: Analysis of data from the first, 5-year-long, period included data from a group of 1812 patients and revealed 5 (0.3%) cases of developmental left-BCV anomalies (3 double left BCV and 2 cases of a single subaortic left BCV). The 16-year-long analysed period included 6110 CIED implantation procedures, which showed 12 (0.2%) cases of PLSVC including 4 (33%) cases of left BCV agenesis. Conclusions: The analysed venograms rarely showed isolated left-BCV aberrations (0.3%), with the combination of left-BCV agenesis and PLSVC being much more common (33%). The morphometry and/or topography of aberrant left-BCV may result in difficulties during cardiac lead insertion.

Abstract

Background: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation procedures with transvenous lead placement afford an opportunity to observe vascular anatomic variations. The course of CIED implantation depends largely on morphometric and topographic characteristics of the relevant brachiocephalic vein (BCV), which is the left BCV in the case of lead insertion via the left clavipectoral triangle. This study aims to present left BCV anomalies arising from abnormal systemic vein embryogenesis and encountered during CIED implantation. Materials and methods: Venograms obtained during CIED implantation procedures and illustrating left BCV topography/morphometry were analysed retrospectively for two types of anomalies: anomalies of the left BCV itself (data from the period 2014–2018) and a combination of left BCV variations with a persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC); since the latter instances are rare, the analysed period was longer (2003–2018). Results: Analysis of data from the first, 5-year-long, period included data from a group of 1812 patients and revealed 5 (0.3%) cases of developmental left-BCV anomalies (3 double left BCV and 2 cases of a single subaortic left BCV). The 16-year-long analysed period included 6110 CIED implantation procedures, which showed 12 (0.2%) cases of PLSVC including 4 (33%) cases of left BCV agenesis. Conclusions: The analysed venograms rarely showed isolated left-BCV aberrations (0.3%), with the combination of left-BCV agenesis and PLSVC being much more common (33%). The morphometry and/or topography of aberrant left-BCV may result in difficulties during cardiac lead insertion.

Get Citation

Keywords

aberrant left brachiocephalic vein, persistent left superior vena cava, venography, lead implantation, cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)

About this article
Title

Types of left brachiocephalic vein aberrations detected during cardiac implantable electronic device implantation procedures

Journal

Folia Morphologica

Issue

Vol 80, No 2 (2021)

Article type

Original article

Pages

317-323

Published online

2020-06-22

Page views

938

Article views/downloads

1238

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2020.0069

Pubmed

32639573

Bibliographic record

Folia Morphol 2021;80(2):317-323.

Keywords

aberrant left brachiocephalic vein
persistent left superior vena cava
venography
lead implantation
cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)

Authors

R. Steckiewicz
P. Stolarz
E. B. Świętoń

References (31)
  1. Biffi M, Bertini M, Ziacchi M, et al. Left superior vena cava persistence in patients undergoing pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: a 10-year experience. Chest. 2001; 120(1): 139–144.
  2. Bowdle A. Vascular complications of central venous catheter placement: evidence-based methods for prevention and treatment. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014; 28(2): 358–368.
  3. Chen SJ, Liu KL, Chen HY, et al. Anomalous brachiocephalic vein: CT, embryology, and clinical implications. Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184(4): 1235–1240.
  4. Curtil A, Tronc F, Champsaur G, et al. The left retro-aortic brachiocephalic vein: morphologic data and diagnostic ultrasound in 27 cases. Surg Radiol Anat. 1999; 21(4): 251–254.
  5. Demos TC, Posniak HV, Pierce KL, et al. Venous anomalies of the thorax. Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 182(5): 1139–1150.
  6. Gibelli G, Biasi S. Persistent left superior vena cava and absent right superior vena cava: not only an anatomic variant. J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2013; 23(1): 42–44.
  7. Goyal SK, Punnam SR, Verma G, et al. Persistent left superior vena cava: a case report and review of literature. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008; 6: 50.
  8. Granata A, Zanoli L, Trezzi M, et al. Anatomical variations of the left anonymous trunk are associated with central venous catheter dysfunction. J Nephrol. 2018; 31(4): 571–576.
  9. Haq AA, Restrepo CS, Lamus D, et al. Thoracic venous injuries: an imaging and management overview. Emerg Radiol. 2016; 23(3): 291–301.
  10. Bachleda JP. Iatrogenic injury to the superior vena cava and brachiocephalic vein. J Infect Dis Ther. 2014; 02(06).
  11. Kahkouee S, Sadr M, Pedarzadeh E, et al. Anomalous left brachiocephalic vein: important vascular anomaly concomitant with congenital anomalies and heart diseases. Folia Morphol. 2017; 76(1): 51–57.
  12. Ko SF, Huang CC, Ng SH, et al. Imaging of the brachiocephalic vein. Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 191(3): 897–907.
  13. Ko SF, Ng SH, Fang FM, et al. Left brachiocephalic vein perforation: computed tomographic features and treatment considerations. Am J Emerg Med. 2007; 25(9): 1051–1056.
  14. Kobayashi M, Ichikawa T, Koizumi J, et al. Aberrant left brachiocephalic vein versus persistent left superior vena cava without bridging vein in adults: evaluation on computed tomography. Ann Vasc Dis. 2018; 11(4): 535–541.
  15. Kondrachuk O, Yalynska T, Tammo R. Double left brachiocephalic vein. Pediatr Cardiol. 2013; 34(3): 767–768.
  16. Kula S, Cevik A, Sanli C, et al. Persistent left superior vena cava: experience of a tertiary health-care center. Pediatr Int. 2011; 53(6): 1066–1069.
  17. Loukas M, Tobola MS, Tubbs RS, et al. The clinical anatomy of the internal thoracic veins. Folia Morphol. 2007; 66(1): 25–32.
  18. Nagashima M, Shikata F, Okamura T, et al. Anomalous subaortic left brachiocephalic vein in surgical cases and literature review. Clin Anat. 2010; 23(8): 950–955.
  19. Povoski SP, Khabiri H. Persistent left superior vena cava: review of the literature, clinical implications, and relevance of alterations in thoracic central venous anatomy as pertaining to the general principles of central venous access device placement and venography in cancer patients. World J Surg Oncol. 2011; 9: 173.
  20. Ratliff HL, Yousufuddin M, Lieving WR, et al. Persistent left superior vena cava: case reports and clinical implications. Int J Cardiol. 2006; 113(2): 242–246.
  21. Ruano CA, Marinho-da-Silva A, Donato P. Congenital thoracic venous anomalies in adults: morphologic MR imaging. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2015; 44(4): 337–345.
  22. Salik E, Daftary A, Tal MG. Three-dimensional anatomy of the left central veins: implications for dialysis catheter placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007; 18(3): 361–364.
  23. Sheikh AS, Mazhar S. Persistent left superior vena cava with absent right superior vena cava: review of the literature and clinical implications. Echocardiography. 2014; 31(5): 674–679.
  24. Shim MS, Kang MJ, Kim J, et al. Circumaortic Left Brachiocephalic Vein: CT Findings. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2010; 62(3): 207.
  25. Standring S. Gray’s anatomy. 39th ed. Hearts and great vessels. Chapter 60. Elsevier, Churchill, Livingstone, Edinburgh 2005: 1027.
  26. Steckiewicz R, Kosior DA, Rosiak M, et al. The prevalence of superior vena cava anomalies as detected in cardiac implantable electronic device recipients at a tertiary cardiology centre over a 12-year period. HJC. 2016; 57(2): 101–106.
  27. Steckiewicz R, Świętoń EB, Stolarz P. A rare vascular anomaly in the form of double left brachiocephalic vein detected incidentally during cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) placement. Folia Morphol. 2018; 77(1): 161–165.
  28. Takada Y, Narimatsu A, Kohno A, et al. Anomalous left brachiocephalic vein: CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992; 16(6): 893–896.
  29. Topcuoglu OM, Atceken Z, Ariyurek OM. Circumaortic doubled left brachiocephalic vein: a rare confusing variation. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015; 37(3): 315–318.
  30. Webb WR, Gamsu G, Speckman JM, et al. Computed tomographic demonstration of mediastinal venous anomalies. Am J Roentgenol. 1982; 139(1): 157–161.
  31. Yigit AE, Haliloglu M, Karcaaltincaba M, et al. Retrotracheal aberrant left brachiocephalic vein: CT findings. Pediatr Radiol. 2008; 38(3): 322–324.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, faks: +48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl