open access

Vol 79, No 4 (2020)
Review article
Published online: 2020-01-27
Submitted: 2019-09-02
Accepted: 2019-11-21
Get Citation

Metric analysis of the lumbar region of human vertebral column

M. Ł. Gleinert-Rożek, A. Kosiński, A. Kaczyńska, M. Zajączkowski, W. Kuta, R. Kamiński, G. Piwko
DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2020.0008
·
Pubmed: 32020579
·
Folia Morphol 2020;79(4):655-661.

open access

Vol 79, No 4 (2020)
REVIEW ARTICLES
Published online: 2020-01-27
Submitted: 2019-09-02
Accepted: 2019-11-21

Abstract

Detailed measurement of lumbar spine, despite the many years of study, still provides new information, especially due to low back pain, which is increasing and unresolved worldwide health problem. This review includes historical background and evolution of measurement methods. The paper also focused on searching optimal animal model of lumbar spine and summarizes current knowledge and essential tips. In addition, practical application of lumbar metric analysis was presented. This summary is a starting point for further consideration.

Abstract

Detailed measurement of lumbar spine, despite the many years of study, still provides new information, especially due to low back pain, which is increasing and unresolved worldwide health problem. This review includes historical background and evolution of measurement methods. The paper also focused on searching optimal animal model of lumbar spine and summarizes current knowledge and essential tips. In addition, practical application of lumbar metric analysis was presented. This summary is a starting point for further consideration.

Get Citation

Keywords

anatomy, anthropology, morphometry, lumbar spine, low back pain, animal models, comparative anatomy

About this article
Title

Metric analysis of the lumbar region of human vertebral column

Journal

Folia Morphologica

Issue

Vol 79, No 4 (2020)

Article type

Review article

Pages

655-661

Published online

2020-01-27

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2020.0008

Pubmed

32020579

Bibliographic record

Folia Morphol 2020;79(4):655-661.

Keywords

anatomy
anthropology
morphometry
lumbar spine
low back pain
animal models
comparative anatomy

Authors

M. Ł. Gleinert-Rożek
A. Kosiński
A. Kaczyńska
M. Zajączkowski
W. Kuta
R. Kamiński
G. Piwko

References (26)
  1. Anderson RJ. Observations on the Diameters of Human Vertebrae in Different Regions. J Anat Physiol. 1883; 17(Pt 3): 341–344.
  2. Busscher I, Ploegmakers JJW, Verkerke GJ, et al. Comparative anatomical dimensions of the complete human and porcine spine. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19(7): 1104–1114.
  3. Cotterill PC, Kostuik JP, D'Angelo G, et al. An anatomical comparison of the human and bovine thoracolumbar spine. J Orthop Res. 1986; 4(3): 298–303.
  4. Dath R, Ebinesan AD, Porter KM, et al. Anatomical measurements of porcine lumbar vertebrae. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007; 22(5): 607–613.
  5. Davis PR. Human lower lumbar vertebrae: some mechanical and osteological consideration. J Anat. 1961; 95: 337–344.
  6. Frostell A, Hakim R, Thelin EP, et al. A Review of the Segmental Diameter of the Healthy Human Spinal Cord. Front Neurol. 2016; 7: 238.
  7. Griffith JF, Huang J, Law SW, et al. Population reference range for developmental lumbar spinal canal size. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2016; 6(6): 671–679.
  8. Henle J. Handbuch der systematischen Anatomie des Menschen. Braunschweig 1855.
  9. Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, et al. The Epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 24(6): 769–781.
  10. Hoy DG, Smith E, Cross M, et al. The global burden of other musculoskeletal disorders: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 73(8): 1462–1469.
  11. Junno JA, Niskanen M, Nieminen MT, et al. Temporal trends in vertebral size and shape from medieval to modern-day. PLoS One. 2009; 4(3): e4836.
  12. Junno JA, Paananen M, Karppinen J, et al. Influence of physical activity on vertebral size. Osteoporos Int. 2011; 22(1): 371–372.
  13. Junno JA, Paananen M, Karppinen J, et al. Influence of physical activity on vertebral strength during late adolescence. Spine J. 2013; 13(2): 184–189.
  14. Junno JA, Paananen M, Karppinen J, et al. Age-related trends in vertebral dimensions. J Anat. 2015; 226(5): 434–439.
  15. Kumar N, Kukreti S, Ishaque M, et al. Anatomy of deer spine and its comparison to the human spine. Anat Rec. 2000; 260(2): 189–203, doi: 10.1002/1097-0185(20001001)260:2<189::AID-AR80>3.0.CO;2-N.
  16. Magee J, McClelland B, Winder J. Current issues with standards in the measurement and documentation of human skeletal anatomy. J Anat. 2012; 221(3): 240–251.
  17. McLain RF, Yerby SA, Moseley TA. Comparative morphometry of L4 vertebrae: comparison of large animal models for the human lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(8): E200–E206.
  18. Meucci RD, Fassa AG, Faria NM. Prevalence of chronic low back pain: systematic review. Rev Saude Publica. 2015; 49: 1–10.
  19. Panjabi MM, Goel V, Oxland T, et al. Human lumbar vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992; 17(3): 299–306.
  20. Pierro A, Cilla S, Maselli G, et al. Sagittal normal limits of lumbosacral spine in a large adult population: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2017; 7: 35.
  21. Piontek J, Budzyńska J. Zmiennoość cech metrycznych kręgosłupa. Przegl Antropol. 1972; 38: 17–26.
  22. Sheng SR, Wang XY, Xu HZ, et al. Anatomy of large animal spines and its comparison to the human spine: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19(1): 46–56.
  23. Tekin Orha A, Dalcik C, Ilbay K. Evaluation of anthropometric characteristics due to sex and age variables of lumbar vertebra and spinal canal. Anthropologist. 2016; 24(2): 617–622.
  24. Wilke HJ, Kettler A, Wenger KH, et al. Anatomy of the sheep spine and its comparison to the human spine. Anat Rec. 1997; 247(4): 542–555, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199704)247:4<542::AID-AR13>3.0.CO;2-P.
  25. Zhou SH, McCarthy ID, McGregor AH, et al. Geometrical dimensions of the lower lumbar vertebrae--analysis of data from digitised CT images. Eur Spine J. 2000; 9(3): 242–248.
  26. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A, et al. Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987; 12(2): 160–166.

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By  "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl