Vol 79, No 4 (2020)
Original article
Published online: 2019-11-26

open access

Page views 1059
Article views/downloads 1200
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Three-dimensional modelling and morphometric investigation of computed tomography images of brown bear’s (Ursus arctos) ossa cruris (Zeugopodium)

İ. Demircioğlu1, G. Kirbaş Doğan2, F. Aksünger Karaavci3, İ. Gürbüz4, Y. Demiraslan4
Pubmed: 31777947
Folia Morphol 2020;79(4):811-816.

Abstract

Background: This study was aimed to examine the detailed morphometrical and morphological characteristics of the bone by creating three-dimensional images through multidetector computed tomography images of ossa cruris in brown bears.

Materials and methods:
Four brown bear ossa cruris were used in the study.

Results:
It was observed that tibia and fibula articulated at proximal and distal epiphysis and they combined, and ossa cruris were shaped in this way. Cochlea tibiae were determined to be sagittally oriented. The length of the tibia was determined to be 268.97 mm and 266.32 mm at right and left sides, respectively. The length of the fibula was determined to be 249.16 mm and 250.19 mm on average at the right and left sides, respectively. In consequence of the correlation analysis, statistical relationships at different rates were detected between the
measured values.

Conclusions: Detailed anatomical examinations are very important in terms of determining the similarities and differences of bear bones with those of the other species in the order Carnivora. Therefore, it is thought that this study will reveal detailed characteristics of ossa cruris of bears and provide data for further studies on archaeological and forensic sciences.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Ambarlı H, Bilgin C. Human–Brown bear conflicts in artvin, northeastern Turkey: encounters, damage, and attitudes. Ursus. 2008; 19(2): 146–153.
  2. Anonymous. http://www.defenders.org/sites/default/files/publications/a_place_for_grizzlies.pdf (Insert Date; 09.08.2019).
  3. Atalar Ö, Özdemir D. Macro-anatomical investigatios on the skeletons of marten (Martes fonia). II. Ossa Membri Pelvini. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi. 2002; 16: 233–236.
  4. Bahadır A, Yıldız H. Veteriner Anatomi: Hareket Sistemi & İç Organlar. Ezgi Kitabevi, Bursa 2008.
  5. Can Ö, Togan İ. Status and management of brown bears in Turkey. Ursus. 2004; 15(1): 48–53, doi: 10.2192/1537-6176(2004)015<0048:samobb>2.0.co;2.
  6. D'Urso PS, Barker TM, Earwaker WJ, et al. Stereolithographic biomodelling in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a prospective trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1999; 27(1): 30–37.
  7. Driesch VDA. Guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. Peabody Museum Bulletin I. Cambridge M.A. Harvard University. 1976: 60–62.
  8. Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy.Third Edition. Saunders, Philadelphia, United States 2002.
  9. Evans HE, De Lahunta A. Miller's anatomy of the dog-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2013 .
  10. France DL. Human and nonhuman bone identification: a color atlas. CRC, Press 2008.
  11. Karan M. Yaban domuzlarında (Sus scrofa) arka bacak kemiklerinin makro-anatomik olarak incelenmesi. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi. 2012; 26: 31–34.
  12. König HE, Liebich HG. (Eds.). Veterinary anatomy of domestic mammals: textbook and colour atlas. Schattauer, Verlag 2013.
  13. Marshall Cavendish Corporation. Mammal anatomy: An illustrated guide. Marshall Cavendish. New York 2010.
  14. McLellan BN, Proctor MF, Huber D, et al. Ursus arctos. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017. e.T41688A121229971. .
  15. Onar V, Belli O. Estimation of shoulder height from long bone measurements on dogs unearthed from the Van-Yoncatepe early Iron Age necropolis in Eastern Anatolia. Revue de médecine vétérinaire. 2005; 156(1): 53–60.
  16. Orcholl JL, Scholar M, Hudson J. Diagnostic Criteria for the Comparison of Human and American Black Bear Skeletal Elements. Electronic document. http://www.uwm.edu/Dept/Grad_Sch/McNair/2001/jackieorcholl.htm (accessed 2006).
  17. Özdemir D, Atalar Ö. Macro-anatomical investigations of the skeletons of squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris). II. Ossa membri pelvini. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi. 2003; 17: 151–154.
  18. Özdemir D, Karan M. Porsuk (Meles meles) iskelet sistemi üzerinde makro- anatomik araştırmalar II. Ossa membri pelvini. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi. 2001; 15(2): 397–400.
  19. Özgel Ö, Aykut M. Macroanatomical Investigation on the Ossa Membri Pelvini of Anatolian Bobcat, Lynx lynx. Pakistan J Zool. 2015; 47(5): 1492–1494.
  20. Polly PD. Limbs in mammalian evolution. Fins into limbs: evolution, development and transformation. ; 2007: 245–268.
  21. Prokop M. General principles of MDCT. Eur J Radiol. 2003; 45 Suppl 1: S4–10.
  22. Turan N. Game and Wild Animals of Turkey–Mammals. Ankara (Turkey). (In Turkish): 1984.
  23. Verhoff MA, Ramsthaler F, Krähahn J, et al. Digital forensic osteology--possibilities in cooperation with the Virtopsy project. Forensic Sci Int. 2008; 174(2-3): 152–156.
  24. Veterinaria NA. Revised 6th edn. International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature. (ICVGAN): 2017.
  25. Yılmaz O. Van kedı̇lerı̇nde ön bacak ı̇skeletı̇nı̇n bı̇lgı̇sayarlı tomografı̇ ı̇le üç boyutlu olarak ı̇ncelenmesı̇. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi Van. 2018.
  26. Yılmaz S, Özkan Z, Özdemir D. Oklu Kirpi (Hystrix cristata) iskelet sistemi üzerinde makro-anatomik araştırmalar. I. Ossa membri thoracici. Tr J Vet Anim Sci. 1998; 22: 389–392.