Morphological and morphometric analysis of the Sacral Hiatus using lumbosacral spine CT scans: clinical relevance in Caudal Epidural Analgesia
, 3, 3, 3, 3
Abstract
Background: To conduct a morphological and morphometric analysis of the sacral hiatus (SH) using lumbosacral spine CT scans and to evaluate its clinical relevance in caudal epidural analgesia (CEA).
Materials and methods: This retrospective study analyzed 77 lumbosacral spine CT scans from a diverse patient population. The shape of the SH was classified into common types: inverted U, inverted V, irregular, and bilobed. Morphometric measurements included the length, width, and depth at the apex of the SH. The apex level of the SH was also determined in relation to the sacral vertebrae, and statistical analysis was performed to identify any correlation between the apex level and the morphometric dimensions.
Results: The most frequent SH shape was inverted U (68.83%), followed by inverted V (20.77%), irregular (9%), and a single instance of a bilobed shape (1.29%). The apex of the SH was most commonly located at the level of the S4 vertebra (75.32%), followed by the S3 vertebra (20.77%), S5 in two (2.59) and S2 in one (1.29%). No significant correlation was found between the level of the apex and the length, width, or depth of the SH. These findings indicate a high degree of anatomical variability in the SH, independent of the apex level.
Conclusions: The anatomical variability of the SH, as observed in this study, underscores the need for individualized assessment during CEA. The lack of correlation between the apex level and the morphometric dimensions of the SH highlights the importance of imaging modalities such as ultrasound or fluoroscopy to ensure precise localization and effective analgesia administration. These insights can improve clinical outcomes by enhancing the accuracy and safety of caudal epidural procedures.
Keywords: anatomical variationsmorphologymorphometrylumbosacral spineCT scanscaudal epidural analgesia
References
- Aggarwal A, Aggarwal A, Sahni D. Morphometry of sacral hiatus and its clinical relevance in caudal epidural block. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009; 31(10): 793–800.
- Asghar A, Naaz S. The volume of the caudal space and sacral canal in human sacrum. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013; 7(12): 2659–2660.
- Chaudhary B, Asghar A, Naaz S, et al. Estimation of the relationship between the sacral hiatus and other dorsal sacral parameters using principle component analysis. Surg Radiol Anat. 2021; 43(9): 1545–1554.
- Chen CPC, Tang SFT, Hsu TC, et al. Ultrasound guidance in caudal epidural needle placement. Anesthesiology. 2004; 101(1): 181–184.
- Desai RR, Jadhav S, Doshi M, et al. Variations in anatomical features of the sacral hiatus in Indian dry sacra. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2014; 3(3): 634.
- Edwards WB, Hingson RA. Continuous caudal anesthesia in obstetrics. Am J Surg. 1942; 57(3): 459–464.
- Kumar V, Nayak SR, Potu BK, et al. Sacral hiatus in relation to low back pain in south Indian population. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2009; 110(7): 436–441.
- Letterman GS, Trotter M. Variations of the male sacrum: Their significance in caudalanalgesia. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1944; 78: 551–555.
- Lewis MPN, Thomas P, Wilson LF, et al. The ‘whoosacral hiatus’ test: a clinical test to confirm correct needle placement in caudal epidural injections. Anaesthesia. 1992; 47(1): 57–58.
- Mustafa MS, Mahmoud OM, El Raouf HHA, et al. Morphometric study of sacral hiatus in adult human Egyptian sacra: their significance in caudal epidural anesthesia. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012; 6(4): 350–357.
- Nagar SKA. study of sacral hiatus in dry human sacra. J Anat Soc India. 2004; 53: 18–21.
- Nalla S, Sanchis-Gimeno J, Paton G. Prevalence of sacral spina bifida occulta with lumbosacral transitional vertebra in a skeletal collection of a South African population. Transl Res Anat. 2024; 36: 100307.
- Patel ZK, Thummar B, Rathod SP. A multicentric study of dry human sacrum of Indian population in Gujrat region. Natl J Integr Res Med. 2011; 2: 31–35.
- Patil SD, Binodkumar JRH, et al. Anatomical study of sacral hiatus for caudal epidural block. Natl J Med Res. 2012; 2: 272–275.
- Rajani S. Anatomical variations of sacral hiatus and associated clinical relevance — a review. Int J Anat Var. 2017; 10: 96–98.
- Sekiguchi M, Yabuki S, Satoh K, et al. An anatomic study of the sacral hiatus: a basis for successful caudal epidural block. Clin J Pain. 2004; 20(1): 51–54.
- Senoglu N, Senoglu M, Oksuz H, et al. Landmarks of the sacral hiatus for caudal epidural block: an anatomical study. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 95(5): 692–695.
- Shewale SN, Laeeque M, Kulkarni PR, et al. Morphological and morphometrical study of sacral hiatus. Int J Recent Trends Sci Technol. 2013; 6: 48–52.
- Standring S, Ellis H, Healy JC. et al.. Gray’s anatomy (39th ed). Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, London 2005: 749–754.
- Stitz MY, Sommer HM. Accuracy of blind versus fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24(13): 1371–1376.
- sSultana D, Shariff DD, Jacob D, et al. A morphological study of sacral hiatus with its clinical implications. Ind J Appl Res. 2011; 4(2): 34–37.
- Tsui BC, Tarkkila P, Gupta S, et al. Confirmation of caudal needle placement using nerve stimulation. Anesthesiology. 1999; 91(2): 374–378.
- Waldman SD. Caudal epidural block: Prone position. In: Atlas of interventional pain management. 2nd ed. Saunders, Philadelphia 2004: 380–392.
- Wysiadecki G, Varga I, Klejbor I, et al. Reporting anatomical variations: should unified standards and protocol (checklist) for anatomical studies and case reports be established? Transl Res Anat. 2024; 35: 100284.
