English Polski
Tom 14, Nr 1 (2019)
Artykuł przeglądowy
Opublikowany online: 2018-09-05

dostęp otwarty

Wyświetlenia strony 657
Wyświetlenia/pobrania artykułu 752
Pobierz cytowanie

Eksport do Mediów Społecznościowych

Eksport do Mediów Społecznościowych

Nowe markery biologiczne w kardiologii — czy to właściwy trop?

Agata Tymińska1, Krzysztof J Filipiak1
Folia Cardiologica 2019;14(1):52-59.

Streszczenie

Istnieje wiele markerów oceny ryzyka chorób sercowo-naczyniowych (CVD). Wciąż poszukuje się nowych czułych i spe- cyficznych biomarkerów, które mogłyby pomóc w stratyfikacji ryzyka zarówno wśród populacji zdrowej, jak i obciążonej CVD. Galektyna 3 oraz białko ST-2 wydają się niezwykle obiecującymi wskaźnikami, niemniej potrzebne są dalsze ba- dania nad tymi cząsteczkami, aby poznać ich pełną wartość diagnostyczno-prognostyczną. W artykule zaprezentowano badania i publikacje przedstawiające możliwość wszechstronnego wykorzystania obu biomarkerów, zwłaszcza w cho- robie wieńcowej. Galektyna-3 oraz białko ST-2, dzięki związkowi z procesami włóknienia, mogą się okazać kluczowymi markerami u pacjentów z chorobą wieńcową oraz po zawale serca.

Artykuł dostępny w formacie PDF

Pokaż PDF Pobierz plik PDF

Referencje

  1. Gierczyński J, Gryglewicz J, Karczewicz E, Zalewska H. Niewydolność serca — analiza kosztów ekonomicznych i społecznych. Uczelnia Łazarskiego, Warszawa 2013.
  2. Ciccone MM, Scicchitano P, Zito A, et al. Correlation between coronary artery disease severity, left ventricular mass index and carotid intima media thickness, assessed by radio-frequency. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2011; 9: 32.
  3. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group . 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(2): 119–177.
  4. Yang RiY, Rabinovich GA, Liu FT. Galectins: structure, function and therapeutic potential. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2008; 10: e17.
  5. Ho JE, Liu C, Lyass A, et al. Galectin-3, a marker of cardiac fibrosis, predicts incident heart failure in the community. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60(14): 1249–1256.
  6. Barboni EA, Bawumia S, Henrick K, et al. Molecular modeling and mutagenesis studies of the N-terminal domains of galectin-3: evidence for participation with the C-terminal carbohydrate recognition domain in oligosaccharide binding. Glycobiology. 2000; 10(11): 1201–1208.
  7. Kakkar R, Lee RT. The IL-33/ST2 pathway: therapeutic target and novel biomarker. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008; 7(10): 827–840.
  8. Shimpo M, Morrow DA, Weinberg EO, et al. Expression and regulation of ST2, an interleukin-1 receptor family member, in cardiomyocytes and myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002; 106(23): 2961–2966.
  9. Meijers WC, van der Velde AR, Pascual-Figal DA, et al. Galectin-3 and post-myocardial infarction cardiac remodeling. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015; 763(Pt A): 115–121.
  10. Gierlotka M, Zdrojewski T, Wojtyniak B, et al. Incidence, treatment, in-hospital mortality and one-year outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in Poland in 2009-2012--nationwide AMI-PL database. Kardiol Pol. 2015; 73(3): 142–158.
  11. Papaspyridonos M, McNeill E, de Bono JP, et al. Galectin-3 is an amplifier of inflammation in atherosclerotic plaque progression through macrophage activation and monocyte chemoattraction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008; 28(3): 433–440.
  12. Iacobini C, Menini S, Ricci C, et al. Advanced lipoxidation end-products mediate lipid-induced glomerular injury: role of receptor-mediated mechanisms. J Pathol. 2009; 218(3): 360–369.
  13. MacKinnon AC, Liu X, Hadoke PWf, et al. Inhibition of galectin-3 reduces atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Glycobiology. 2013; 23(6): 654–663.
  14. Sanchez-Mas J, Lax A, Asensio-Lopez MC, et al. Galectin-3 expression in cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2014; 172(1): e98–e9e101.
  15. González GE, Cassaglia P, Noli Truant S, et al. Galectin-3 is essential for early wound healing and ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction in mice. Int J Cardiol. 2014; 176(3): 1423–1425.
  16. Tsai TH, Sung PH, Chang LT, et al. Value and level of galectin-3 in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2012; 19(12): 1073–1082.
  17. Gullestad L, Ueland T, Kjekshus J, et al. CORONA Study Group. Galectin-3 predicts response to statin therapy in the Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Trial in Heart Failure (CORONA). Eur Heart J. 2012; 33(18): 2290–2296.
  18. Szadkowska I, Wlazeł RN, Migała M, et al. The association between galectin-3 and clinical parameters in patients with first acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Cardiol J. 2013; 20(6): 577–582.
  19. Weir RAP, Petrie C, Murphy C, et al. Galectin-3 and cardiac function in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Circ Heart Fail. 2013; 6(3): 492–498.
  20. van der Velde AR, Lexis CPH, Meijers WC, et al. Galectin-3 and sST2 in prediction of left ventricular ejection fraction after myocardial infarction. Clin Chim Acta. 2016; 452: 50–57.
  21. Seki K, Sanada S, Kudinova AY, et al. Interleukin-33 prevents apoptosis and improves survival after experimental myocardial infarction through ST2 signaling. Circ Heart Fail. 2009; 2(6): 684–691.
  22. Dominguez-Rodriguez A, Abreu-Gonzalez P. Clinical implications of elevated serum interleukin-6, soluble CD40 ligand, metalloproteinase-9, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol. 2009; 32(5): 288.
  23. Guzel S, Serin O, Guzel EC, et al. Interleukin-33, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and tissue inhibitor [corrected] of matrix metalloproteinase-1 in myocardial infarction. Korean J Intern Med. 2013; 28(2): 165–173.
  24. Richards AM, Di Somma S, Mueller T. ST2 in stable and unstable ischemic heart diseases. Am J Cardiol. 2015; 115(7 Suppl): 48B–58B.
  25. Shimpo M, Morrow DA, Weinberg EO, et al. Serum levels of the interleukin-1 receptor family member ST2 predict mortality and clinical outcome in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2004; 109(18): 2186–2190.
  26. Jenkins WS, Roger VL, Jaffe AS, et al. Prognostic value of soluble ST2 after myocardial infarction: a community perspective. Am J Med. 2017; 130(9): 1112.e9–1112.e15.
  27. Sabatine MS, Morrow DA, Higgins LJ, et al. Complementary roles for biomarkers of biomechanical strain ST2 and N-terminal prohormone B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2008; 117(15): 1936–1944.
  28. Dhillon OS, Narayan HK, Quinn PA, et al. Interleukin 33 and ST2 in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: comparison with Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Risk Scoring and NT-proBNP. Am Heart J. 2011; 161(6): 1163–1170.
  29. Weir RAP, Miller AM, Murphy GEJ, et al. Serum soluble ST2: a potential novel mediator in left ventricular and infarct remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55(3): 243–250.
  30. Ho JE, Yin X, Levy D, et al. Galectin 3 and incident atrial fibrillation in the community. Am Heart J. 2014; 167(5): 729–734.e1.
  31. Wu XY, Li SN, Wen SN, et al. Plasma galectin-3 predicts clinical outcomes after catheter ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation patients without structural heart disease. Europace. 2015; 17(10): 1541–1547.
  32. Kornej J, Schmidl J, Ueberham L, et al. Galectin-3 in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation. PLoS One. 2015; 10(4): e0123574.
  33. Chen C, Qu X, Gao Z, et al. Soluble ST2 in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and prediction of heart failure. Int Heart J. 2018; 59(1): 58–63.
  34. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013; 128(16): 1810–1852.
  35. Coglianese EE, Larson MG, Vasan RS, et al. Distribution and clinical correlates of the interleukin receptor family member soluble ST2 in the Framingham Heart Study. Clin Chem. 2012; 58(12): 1673–1681.
  36. Lancellotti P, Dulgheru R, Magne J, et al. Elevated plasma soluble ST2 is associated with heart failure symptoms and outcome in aortic stenosis. PLoS One. 2015; 10(9): e0138940.
  37. Stundl A, Lünstedt NS, Courtz F, et al. Soluble ST2 for risk stratification and the prediction of mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2017; 120(6): 986–993.
  38. Wojciechowska C, Romuk E, Nowalany-Kozielska E, et al. Serum galectin-3 and ST2 as predictors of unfavorable outcome in stable dilated cardiomyopathy patients. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2017; 58(5): 350–359.
  39. Sharma UC, Pokharel S, van Brakel TJ, et al. Galectin-3 marks activated macrophages in failure-prone hypertrophied hearts and contributes to cardiac dysfunction. Circulation. 2004; 110(19): 3121–3128.
  40. Stolen CM, Adourian A, Meyer TE, et al. Plasma galectin-3 and heart failure outcomes in MADIT-CRT (multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy). J Card Fail. 2014; 20(11): 793–799.
  41. Weir RAP, Miller AM, Murphy GEJ, et al. Serum soluble ST2: a potential novel mediator in left ventricular and infarct remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55(3): 243–250.
  42. Yu L, Ruifrok WPT, Meissner M, et al. Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of galectin-3 prevents cardiac remodeling by interfering with myocardial fibrogenesis. Circ Heart Fail. 2013; 6(1): 107–117.